Ok, no offense but *duh* I know he was talking about label claims. However, I was asking where I could view this information as I do not seem to find anything about it online.
I don't dispute what you guys are saying. AST's ALA may be worthless; the company may be worthless... I don't really have a strong opinion; however, just saying that they are sh*t doesn't make it so. And coming out with things like, "They failed testing" should be able to be backed up with a "this test was conducted by... and showed..." or something.
Otherwise it is regurgitated b.s. one person passes on to another without reason or evidence.
So... I say again... what test did they fail? Who did this test? What were the results?
Hey, don't get me wrong. I don't like certain brands either... but while I might say, "Hey, I don't like Optimum. I think they are crap." If someone says, "What makes you say that?" My answer is just, "I just don't like the way they present themselves. I don't like their affiliation with GNC. Sometimes they just seem too cheap compared to other names that I know are good." I can't say, "Their stuff sucks." Because I don't know that.
So... you say AST sucks. I just would like to know why that is said. I don't think that's asking too much.