so then you read this part
and this part
I have no problem with measures being taken to make sure that supplement companies are responsible for what they put in their products, my problem is this bill doesnt do just that. As usaul the government has decided to piggy back other issues that they think should be included. I dont think a company should have go through Drug Approval process to be able to bring a supplement to market. How do you think that will go? Supplement manufacturers will have no choice to push the cost on to use, maybe tripleing the cost of supplements.
These were my concerns as well. Too many loopholes, Vitamin Makers could be in trouble for misbranding, just about ever Glucose Disposal Agent on the market would no longer be able to tout the positive effects on insulin sensitivity, or that they stimulate the glut 4 reaction causing an uptake in the nutrients.
I definitely agree that if someone puts a steroid in a natural product, or an illegal stimulant or thyroid medication in a weight loss supplement they should be punished.
However they don't need a new law for this. That is already a felony, just the same as selling crack cocaine. It is a felony possession, and distribution charge. We don't need another law on the books to prosecute these people or for that matter anyone knowingly involved in the operation. Also as you posted earlier if this does not apply to supplements then someone putting a steroid in a supplement wouldn't then be covered under this so they could then get away with it? No, it is till a jail-able offence because the distribution of illegal substances is already illegal.
With that being said, I doubt the FDA will have a problem in making the leap that any supplement containing animal product or vegetation farmed for the purpose of human ingestion can be considered as a food product. That would include natural herbs, and protein powders.
As far as the other portion of the mislabeling part regarding knowingly and intentionally defrauding or misleading on the label.
Fraud is already a felony charge as well and the very definition is what is described in the language above so once again, why is the bill needed?
Some may see my statement of facts, and my opinon formed by them as a stretch but the language completely leaves it open to interpretation. Unfortunately in my opinion when the Government is the one interpreting it, it is typically to benefit the lobbiest with the most money to toss at them.