Response from my senator -Supp Safety Act
- 01-13-2011, 04:53 PM
Response from my senator -Supp Safety Act
Dear Mr. Larry *****^*^
Thank you for contacting me regarding the Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010 (S. 3002). I appreciate hearing from you.
Dietary supplements are safely consumed by millions of Americans every day. I take a multivitamin every morning. The vast majority of these supplements do not result in harm to the consumer and have been safely used in the marketplace for many years.
Senator McCain of Arizona introduced the Dietary Supplement Safety Act to require dietary supplement manufacturers to register with the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and fully disclose the ingredients of their products. If the ingredients are not approved by the FDA, the products would be subject to removal from the marketplace. Manufacturers would be required to report all adverse reactions and to demonstrate to the FDA that new dietary ingredients are safe.
I have heard from constituents who wonder why Congress is considering additional legislation when most dietary supplements are perfectly safe and may be beneficial. Sadly, some manufacturers do not put the safety of their customers first. Reputable manufacturers with safe products have nothing to hide. At the same time, I understand your concerns that increasing FDA's authority to regulate supplements may limit consumer access to some products. I will keep your concerns in mind as this legislation is discussed on the Senate floor.
Thank you again for your message. Please feel free to keep in touch.
Richard J. Durbin
United States Senator
Just thought I'd share
- 01-13-2011, 04:55 PM
01-13-2011, 05:43 PM
01-13-2011, 08:13 PM
01-13-2011, 09:04 PM
01-13-2011, 09:31 PM
I have been planning to try and message durbin as well, my problem is I have written congressman in the past on various issues and have neve felt me concern did anything. I feel his response even to you was semi generic.
01-13-2011, 09:41 PM
01-13-2011, 10:02 PM
01-14-2011, 10:07 AM
the only way to fight this thing is to start an actual organization of educated users all coming together as one to fight this thing.
01-14-2011, 02:03 PM
01-14-2011, 02:16 PM
it wont pass. itll crumble a 25billion+ industry overnight. nothing is fda approved at this point
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals Representative Manager
01-14-2011, 02:26 PM
DSHEA basically told them "YOU HAVE NO POWER TO REGULATE HERBALLY BASED INGREDIENTS, NOR THEIR SYNTHETIC FORMS, OR ANYTHING ALREADY IN "FOOD"..SO SUCK IT"
This pisses them off to no end, because of course they are power hungry ****s.
01-14-2011, 02:36 PM
My single biggest concern here is the likely fact that we are all fighting the pharmaceutical companies on this. There is simply no other argument that makes sense. For the purpose of this thread, "they" = the government as a whole or the individuals such as the rep that is quoted above.
They cannot argue safety in a logical manner. Otherwise, they need to ban alcohol, skydiving, 1300cc sport bikes, etc too. No one ever got big in the gym, and lost control of their car and killed a family of 5 due to it. We let people die every day due to alcohol but no one is willing to stand on the floor of congress and say "stop making it". Besides, I like beer so that is not a good solution.
They cannot argue the benefits of using supplements. If the supps do not work, there is no reason to ban them. They do work however, and pharm companies are losing the profits they might make if they offered a competing "legit" alternative. We are being "c0ck blocked" in a AS/PH kind of way. IMO, BALCO should be a model company for how real and effective supplements could be legitimized and made safer for consumers.
Most people on forums like this agree that it is up to individuals to decide what they want to take. I can legally drink whisky until my liver falls out but, they tell me I can't get big and strong. WTF is up with that? Don't punish the rest of us because of a few bad apples. I had enough of that in grade school.
Governing bodies for sports and the individual athletes are responsible for their own ethical conduct. IMO, all major sports are "dirty" anyway so the hypocrisy just reeks. Baseball is the worst for hypocrisy, the sport that flourished for years on "greenies" and cortisone ****tail abuse. MLB has the nerve to stand before congress and say "we think there might be a small problem". Give me a break.
Don't even get me started on trying to figure out why congress is investigating MLB for violating existing laws.........what complete waste of their time and OUR money.
And, very few fans actually want to see their sport regress. But, if you waved a magic wand and PEDs were instantly gone, ALL pro sports would regress 25+ years over night. There is too much money involved so you can bet that will not happen.
I could go on and on but it's pointless. But, you can bet your sweet a55 that if "we" could collectively line the pockets of the right politicians, then you'd see companies like BALCO flourish. Unfortunately, that would put most current suppplement companies out of business except for guys that would still need to sell good protein, and other non AS/PH products that work.
And, IMO, this is a world class brush off.
An individual does not concern people like this senator unless you are going to make the news in some noteworthy fashion.I have heard from constituents who wonder why Congress is considering additional legislation when most dietary supplements are perfectly safe and may be beneficial. Sadly, some manufacturers do not put the safety of their customers first. Reputable manufacturers with safe products have nothing to hide. At the same time, I understand your concerns that increasing FDA's authority to regulate supplements may limit consumer access to some products. I will keep your concerns in mind as this legislation is discussed on the Senate floor.
01-14-2011, 02:46 PM
On one hand you rage against those companies because of their lack of ethics and integrity for poisoning you with unknow ingredients, yet you cry about it when someone actually legislates the industry.
You buy alcohol, you get alcohol. You know you consume alcohol, you know the risks, you abuse it and you get sick and die.
You by supplements and you have no idea what you are getting.
In my time on the board I have seen too many threads to count about members bashing and hating on dangerous products coming from supplements companies.
You can't eat your cake and have it too.
Life is a terminal condition.
She thinks that happiness is a mat that sits on her doorway.
01-14-2011, 02:48 PM
01-14-2011, 02:51 PM
01-14-2011, 02:54 PM
01-14-2011, 03:02 PM
Guys does this sound ok???
I am writing you today to express my concern about the Dietary Supplement Safety Act introduced by Senator John McCain. I would urge you not to cast your vote to let this piece of legislation pass. This act would:
1) Destroy American's access to affordable supplements and nutritional products.
2) Eliminate innovation in the field of supplements and sports nutrition.
3) Give the FDA more power than they already have to destroy small supplement companies as they pander to the whims of large pharmaceutical companies.
4) Destroy all of the rights citizens were granted by the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) of 1994.
Once again Senator I plead with you to consider the long term, wide reaching affects that this legislature would carry. And I also thank you for your consideration.
"Orangatang(named changed for anonymity)"
That's what I wrote to my senators.
01-14-2011, 03:17 PM
01-14-2011, 03:18 PM
Giving the FDA, the most corrupt and poorly managed government organization, is that it will lead to even worse regulation and so many products become prescription (lovaza, are you kidding me, its fish oil! and P5P). Regulation is needed and DSHEA is supposed to address that, we don't need anything else.
01-14-2011, 03:30 PM
We are SICK of expanding gov ernment, incursion on rights, and ballooning budgets. We started making our statement in the last election, and if they are too stupid to get it we will continue to vote the corrupt *******s out.
DSHEA was also an overwhelming statement...we want to decide for OURSELVES what to take and what not to take. The FDA no longer represents the people, but has been corrupted beyond that. Cite the recent moves to ban P5P (a form of B6) and Injectible vitamin C.
We are getting VERY sick of, instead of focusing on work and economic recovery, the sleazebag moves of corrupt officials constantly trying to erode our rights. Our votes are our statements of trust - and this legislation is a violation of that trust. We are not ignorant soccer moms easily panicked by propaganca. We are American citizens, and we are getting damn tired of the games.
01-14-2011, 03:35 PM
I want better supplements and better access to them without govt interference. I am not raging period and certainly not raging against an industry that provides goods that I buy to enhance my life.
01-14-2011, 08:15 PM
I think dsade has hit the nail on the head in this thread. The laws currently do protect against mislabeling ingredients. This is the extent of what we need. Honestly I think mislabeling, especially in hormonal products should be punishable by law. But this regulation would go significantly beyond it. And to anyone who claims I am biased because of my affiliation with primordial, please... I have stated numerous times that If they mislabeled a hormone and it was brought to light I would easily change my title on this board to registered user. My loyality relies in knowing I would never have to do that and proper measurements are taken to make sure the other companies do it as well. Look around you know who the good companies are and who is taking this industry to a level it should be at, and who contributes to the regulation requirements. Why should the companies who do take safety and customer loyalty to heart be attacked and put under the control of something as ****ing corrupt as the FDA? It's a joke.
01-15-2011, 08:04 PM
The FDA and Big Pharma will not stop until all but vitamin c will be banned and maybe even that will need a prescription.
01-15-2011, 08:10 PM
01-15-2011, 08:23 PM
This is not "big pharma" ...
What it is ...
1. An outgrowth of our health care system - which is "communal" now. Most Health Care is taken care of by insurance or government - this means that everyone has a stake in everybody else's health.
2. The "busy bodies" have taken over - those would be the people who have no lives and so, they want to control yours. I said this over a decade ago when they went after the cigarette companies ... eventually they'll get around to everyone else consuming a product they don't like. I was right. California has banned transfat, New York is trying to control salt, some communities are banning happy meals ... it's out of control.
3. Government has adopted the attitude that it has to protect you from yourself.
This can all be solved but it will mean completely returning our health care system to the state it was in 50 years ago. There wasn't really any "insurance" back then. Of course - this presents certain problems when something catastrophic happens with your health - but it's the price for liberty.
We also need to tell the "busy bodies" to shut the hell up. But so far - no one's willing to smack them on their asses.
01-15-2011, 10:20 PM
want to know something funny. my allergy meds used to be covered by my insurance, well somehow they got it made over the counter so insurance didn't have to cover it. now, because of abuse they are thinking to make it by prescription only again, lol.
if this legislation happens here is what we are in for:
much much higher insurance rates to cover the cost of increased prescriptions.
i see this as a real war between big pharma and big insurance.
WELL DONE IS BETTER THAN WELL SAID
01-16-2011, 03:01 AM
There are guidelines. Not following them is illegal already. Mislabeling is illegal already. What part of this do you not understand? This isn't about safety, it is about control.
Not having insurance is the farthest from what this country needs. If you don't want insurance, then don't have it, but the thought that one should go bankrupt if something were to happen to them would be taking our country very far in the opposite direction of progress.
Government wants this = More Power, More Control. **** the FDA. The level of corruption is beyond itself.
Insurance = Honestly, I am not sure of what Insurance's desires in this legislation would be. One the one hand, natural remedies keep people away from the doctor which means less claims, On the other hand thinking Insurance CEOs, Health Care CEOs, and Pharma CEOs are not having golf sessions with each other regularly is ludacris. I know there is a motive, just not sure what it would be.
01-16-2011, 03:10 AM
01-16-2011, 10:15 AM
sorry heretostudy-i can't believe the insurance companies would be behind this. if vitamins were to be made by prescription only-imagine all the extra doctor visits, not to mention these vitamins would now be covered on our insurance.
this is the best arguement i can think of:
if this legislation happens the increased cost of these nutrional supplements being covered by insurance would make our co-payments astronomical.
you can bet the insurance companies would pass this additional cost onto us-i put my life savings on that bet!!!!!!!
djbombsquad-get your head out of your arse!!!!
WELL DONE IS BETTER THAN WELL SAID
Similar Forum Threads
- By Jayhawkk in forum PoliticsReplies: 3Last Post: 07-29-2009, 03:49 PM
- By CryingEmo in forum PoliticsReplies: 3Last Post: 09-23-2008, 11:31 AM
- By anabolicrhino in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 08-05-2007, 09:18 AM
- By yeahright in forum PoliticsReplies: 52Last Post: 08-16-2006, 02:27 AM
- By metacat in forum AnabolicsReplies: 13Last Post: 02-15-2003, 03:42 PM