- 12-14-2008, 03:31 PM
How doescompare to ? Does it absorb better being bonded to glucose? If it does would you need to take less? It seems to be the new hi-tech creatine in some newer creatine products (ie Size On, No-Shotgun v3....) I will not buy that expensive stuff but Nutra Planet has some bulk.
- 12-14-2008, 06:14 PM
I like the gluconate myself. I can "feel it a little more than mono. Everybody is different though. It's worth a try.
12-14-2008, 08:04 PM
12-14-2008, 10:05 PM
some believe you will see more strength with gluconate as compared to straight creatine monohydrate. In my opinion it is all in the eye of the beholder
☣☣☣☣Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals Representative☣☣☣☣
Mesomorph | Hemavo2 | Endurance | 100% Whey Protean | REM 8.0
12-15-2008, 05:30 PM
I really enjoyed Gluc better than Mono though both worked good for me. I took it pre- and post wo and had great pumps on it with little water retention.
Head Purus Labs Rep
12-16-2008, 08:27 AM
I want to say I took 1 tsp. per day. I don't think it needs a loading dose like monohydrate. Hopefully this helps. I tried all the expensive brands, caps and powders. I liked gluconate powder from Nutraplanet. I also got a good response from Cre-Ethyl Thunder by Omega. Good stuff too.Those are 240 caps per bottle I think for like $25. Size On was by far the worst stuff I tried. Expensive as hell and gives a very unplesant aftertaste.
12-17-2008, 02:10 PM
Similar Forum Threads
- By paulygon in forum SupplementsReplies: 6Last Post: 10-10-2008, 08:46 AM
- By footster in forum SupplementsReplies: 2Last Post: 08-19-2008, 01:18 AM
- By jjohn in forum SupplementsReplies: 73Last Post: 03-13-2007, 02:12 AM
- By sogone2day in forum NutraplanetReplies: 19Last Post: 11-03-2006, 07:22 PM