Sigma Tau (a big pharma co. based in Rome) owns all the patents to the Carnitines (except for L-Tartrate, which Lonza owns the parental dosage use patent)- and they are currently enforcing the patents pretty strictly. PLCAR is going to very hard to find very soon- Sigma Tau sells GlycoCarn, which is glycine Propionyl L Carnitine- which is a much more expensive alternative- that may be your best bet...[Hi there folks. I want to buy bulk plcar, but nobody seems to sell it. Doe anbody know a source or website, where they are selling it?
Thank you.
PS: Nutraplanet is not an option for me, since they won't let me buy from them.]
You can't patent an amino acid, only attempt to patent the compound FOR specific uses.Sigma Tau (a big pharma co. based in Rome) owns all the patents to the Carnitines (except for L-Tartrate, which Lonza owns the parental dosage use patent)- and they are currently enforcing the patents pretty strictly. PLCAR is going to very hard to find very soon- Sigma Tau sells GlycoCarn, which is glycine Propionyl L Carnitine- which is a much more expensive alternative- that may be your best bet...
correct- they hold the use patent for parental dosage forms on most of the carnitines- I had a loooong conversation with their director of NA marketing the other day...You can't patent an amino acid, only attempt to patent the compound FOR specific uses.
An example is Molecular Nutrition's Patent on Arachidonic Acid FOR muscle building.
For what use?correct- they hold the use patent for parental dosage forms on most of the carnitines- I had a loooong conversation with their director of NA marketing the other day...
For what use?
also correct- just re-iterating what the gentleman told me....I forget if he told me if it was both enteric or parenteral, or both- but I know Lonza's was for enteric for the L-Carn-L-Tart...and FYI, parenteral means INJECTED or infused, not oral use (which would be enteral).
These compounds are dietary by nature, and thus you are not able to patent the compound, only special uses.
Which would not cover the inclusion of LCLT in Virile Mane, for example.also correct- just re-iterating what the gentleman told me....I forget if he told me if it was both enteric or parenteral, or both- but I know Lonza's was for enteric for the L-Carn-L-Tart...
so only for use specificity? I know if the IP is not defended for a period of time, basically any challenge to the patent can be upheld under a latching statue.....Which would not cover the inclusion of LCLT in Virile Mane, for example.
Also, looking at the PLCAR patent - it is strictly for the use of treating intermittent claudication, and therefore only products marketed for that purpose would be in violation.
ALCAR looks to be for treatment of alzheimers - again, not covering other uses.
so only for use specificity? I know if the IP is not defended for a period of time, basically any challenge to the patent can be upheld under a latching statue.....
If Big Pharma has their way, they will be banned and moved to prescription status, yes - as will most other interesting, though natural, compounds.So if ALCAR was put on the market as an alzheimer's drug- wouldn't it have to be taken off the market as a supplement?the rep from Sigma was claiming that PLCAR was about to become a clinical drug in the US (it is already prescription in Europe)- so wouldn't that automatically prohibit sales?
just asking- I find it very odd that something that has been on the market 10 plus years can all of a sudden require a prescription- and then all of the raw material providers for it all of a sudden dissappear (not all the way, there are still a couple left)....
He was pretty adamant that this would happen- at least with PLCAR- the funny thing is, PLCAR from a decent supplier will run you $40-80 kg- but GlycoCarn is about $270/kgCorrect...compounds can be patented for novel uses - if they pass - but you cannot then claim that nobody else can use the compound for any other reason at all.
If Big Pharma has their way, they will be banned and moved to prescription status, yes - as will most other interesting, though natural, compounds.
Actually, PLCAR is up to around $140 a kilo right now - due to Chinese "problems" stemming from the Olympics.He was pretty adamant that this would happen- at least with PLCAR- the funny thing is, PLCAR from a decent supplier will run you $40-80 kg- but GlycoCarn is about $270/kg![]()
exactly.see my "supplement triangle of death" reply on another threadthis same thing has happened with probably 50 other compounds that I can think of off the top of my head....
and you are right- this is how a great compound becomes a perceived shitty one b/c it is rampantly underdosed, both because of price, and garbage-pail formulas- and HMB is a great example- if they kept it cheap, and people took 10-15 grams a day- the gains are phenomenal
and I re-checked prices- the suppliers have gone up quite a bit on the price of PLCAR- but so has everything else- we had some raws get jacked up 50%...
No worries- they are spending ONE BEEEEEELION DOLLARSSorry to butt in. What do you suppose LEF is paying to market Glycocarn?
that is rough- we are trying to hold down prices ourselves- it has gotten completely out of control over the last few months....doing everything in-house helps, but when you factor in machinery, facility maintenance, testing equipment for cGMPs, etc. it starts to add up.....exactly.
We are actually running DCP right now at break even, which ties up a LOT of capital for zero return.
Sigma Tau (a big pharma co. based in Rome) owns all the patents to the Carnitines (except for L-Tartrate, which Lonza owns the parental dosage use patent)- and they are currently enforcing the patents pretty strictly. PLCAR is going to very hard to find very soon- Sigma Tau sells GlycoCarn, which is glycine Propionyl L Carnitine- which is a much more expensive alternative- that may be your best bet...
in reality- no- they are probably about the same in terms of effectiveness- they just carry a different price tag.....GLPC is inferior to Plcar, so I was told, is this true? Even 1fast400 are out of plcar.
I only want 200 grams, so it will last me about 100 days. Google is my friend, but very few matches.
in reality- no- they are probably about the same in terms of effectiveness- they just carry a different price tag.....
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2008 Feb;18(1):19-36.
Effect of glycine propionyl-L-carnitine on aerobic and anaerobic exercise performance.
Smith WA, Fry AC, Tschume LC, Bloomer RJ.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of glycine propionyl-L-carnitine (GPLC) supplementation and endurance training for 8 wk on aerobic- and anaerobic-exercise performance in healthy men and women (age 18-44 yr). Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: placebo (n=9), 1 g/d GPLC (n=11), or 3 g/d GPLC (n=12), in a double-blind fashion. Muscle carnitine (vastus lateralis), VO(2peak), exercise time to fatigue, anaerobic threshold, anaerobic power, and total work were measured at baseline and after an 8-wk aerobic-training program. There were no statistical differences (p> .05) between or within the 3 groups for any performance-related variable or muscle carnitine concentrations after 8 wk of supplementation and training. These results suggest that up to 3 g/d GPLC for 8 wk in conjunction with aerobic-exercise training is ineffective for increasing muscle carnitine content and has no significant effects on aerobic- or anaerobic-exercise performance.
Effect of propionyl-L-carnitine on exercise performance in peripheral arterial disease.
Barker G A; Green S; Askew C D; Green A A; Walker P J
Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2001;33(9):1415-22.
BACKGROUND: Supplementation with propionyl-L-carnitine (PLC) may be of use in improving the exercise capacity of people with peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: After a 2-wk exercise familiarization phase, seven subjects displaying intermittent claudication were studied over a 12-wk period consisting of three 4-wk phases, baseline (B), supplementation (S), and placebo (P). PLC was supplemented at 2 g x d(-1), and subjects were blinded to the order of supplementation. Unilateral calf strength and endurance were assessed weekly. Walking performance was assessed at the end of each phase using an incremental protocol, during which respiratory gases were collected. RESULTS: Although there was not a significant increase in maximal walking time ( approximately 14%) in the whole group, walking time improved to a greater extent than the individual baseline coefficient of variation in four of the seven subjects. The changes in walking performance were correlated with changes in the respiratory exchange ratio both at steady state (r = 0.59) and maximal exercise (r = 0.79). Muscle strength increased significantly from 695 +/- 198 N to 812 +/- 249 N by the end of S. Changes in calf strength from B to S were modestly related to changes in walking performance (r = 0.56). No improvements in calf endurance were detected throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that, in addition to walking performance, muscle strength can be increased in PAD patients after 4 wk of supplementation with propionyl-L-carnitine.