Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

The Supplement Boycott

Astronugget

New member
So I hear about this new supplement. It is advertised well, with cool colors and catchy slogans. For some reason I really want it. The company says that it can do all these cool things, and so I buy it, and it doesn't do anything because its a bs product. I'v been foiled again. (This is a story that i'm sure many of you have played out)

I don't know if anyone else is fed up with marketing bs by all these supplement companies, but I am.

So I propose a massive boycott then, of all the supplements out there, with the exception of the following:

(companies listen up, and remember I'm referring to pretty much all of you, not one in particular)

1.) If the supplement you are advertising has LEGITIMATE CLINICAL TRIAL(S) to back up the claims of the product's effectiveness.

Im so tired of all these pseudo-studies being advertised in order to turn a supplement into something its not. I don't care if there is some ####ing study from like 50 years ago that shows one of the active ingredients in your gimmicky "proprietary blend" increases "such and such hormone" by 30% or 200% or whatever. I don't give a S### if your little supplement has never before seen ingredients that don't even have any sort of study on them that even HINTS at the possibility that the ingredient might be "Anabolic" or "Fat Burning" or whatever the hell you advertise your overpriced bottle of garbage to do. I don't care if you have done a "Case Study" on your product, which showed that the little number of participants "gained X amount on their bench press" or "Lost X amount of weight" there are thousands of other things that they could have been taking at the time of the "study" to make that happen.

And for those companies that do release "clinical trials", they are usually BS as well. Sometime they wont even have a placebo control group, sometimes instead of using a placebo, they will just use some other supplement that doesn't have any studies showing its effectiveness either, and when their product out performs it, they will show the amazing results. "Our product outperformed this supplement which itself hasn't even been proven to do anything!" Or the tested product will seem to have induced an increase in strength or whatever, until you look at the margin of error in the subjects results, which is sometimes greater than the increase or decrease itself. Or you can look at the calculated probability factor, which determines the probability of the differences in the results actually being from the supplement: sometimes this is as high as 20%! Usually, results from studies on drugs have to have a probability of less than 5% to be considered a possibility of the cause of an effect. It is also important to look at the actual amount of strength/weight/increase/loss between the placebo and supplement groups. For example there is one supplement that advertised and increase in bench press 1 rep max to go up 44%. Also a 25 pound increase vs the (unsaid) pound increase in the placebo. OK lets look at those numbers: If the participants that took the supplement gained 44% on their bench that was 25 lbs total, that means that the starting bench press for these participants was only 57 pounds! Then we see in other places that it says "44% over the placebo" which makes more sense. But it still shows us that companies will say one thing in one place, and leave out things in another place depending on which way they will be interpreted in their context's.

2.) For the supplements that do have clinical trials: The clinical trials show that the product may do what it is ADVERTISED to do.

"Increases such and such within the body by such and such percent!" We will see this a lot. Companies will find legit clinical trials to back up statements like these (SOMETIMES) for one of their ingredients(which we don't get to know how much is in the proprietary blend by the way). And so they will advertise the product to be "Anabolic" or whatever. But sadly, the little increase in "such and such hormone" doesn't necessarily mean that it will do ANYTHING. You still have failed to present us with ANY evidence that shows your product will help build muscle, or burn fat, or whatever. I don't give the slightest S### if one of your ingredients has been shown to produce slight increases in protein synthesis in rats. Is anyone with me???

3.) Doesn't claim to have "clinical trials underway" and give us consumers a bunch of amazing numbers like they are real.

This is just another con artist move that companies will pull. They will say s### like. "We are currently conducting a clinical trial of our new product. Some subjects experienced a gain of 30 pounds of muscle and a loss of 20 pounds of fat, while strength was blah blah blah blah bladidy fu#%ing blah...." These companies insult our intelligence with BS like this.


So go on, whoever is a little company fanboy or rep, and flame the hell out of me. Call me names and other ignorant s### like that. Say i'm some competitor or something lame. You will just show everyone how stupid you are. Drop your little bottle of sugar pills and hit the gym, fridge, and bed.

As for those of you who agree with me, join me in my boycott and spread the word. We can make all these "supplement" companies be real with us , and stop advertising to us like we are idiots.

The rest of you consumers out there, try doing some research on supplements and reading the f###### ingredients label before you buy it.


Peace-
Astronuggets
 
I'm in - only supplements for me that have clinical trials from now on. I guess I can survive on MassFX alone. ;)

Otherwise....sorry, man. Fail. No arguments, and respect your opinion, but why post this in a section about supplements when people are here to learn about the very thing you are trying to dissuade them from doing? It's like putting a no-smoking sticker on the bottom of an ash tray.
 
I hate long winded boring posts. Posters....keep it to the point....skip the verbal diarreah!!!!!!


Yeah, Yeah...most supps are BS even with supposed clinical tests.
 
most big supplement companies use research that is open to the public anyway...most of them probably would say that research studies back up the product and or its ingredients reguardless of clinical trials if any, the science supports it!

you are just a moron if you follow "one participant gained 8.2lbs in 8 weeks" or "10,000% increase in free testosterone", (guess these adds right and i won't neg your @ss)! All are/were best case senario if not flat out lies.

do you work for muscle missions or that guy that walks into a sup shop and blindly asks for FDA approved products?
 
I'm in - only supplements for me that have clinical trials from now on. I guess I can survive on MassFX alone. ;)

Otherwise....sorry, man. Fail. No arguments, and respect your opinion, but why post this in a section about supplements when people are here to learn about the very thing you are trying to dissuade them from doing? It's like putting a no-smoking sticker on the bottom of an ash tray.


i'm not trying to stop anyone from taking supplements. I think supplements are pretty cool if they have been shown to be effective with real science and not marketing hype.
 
I found that hormones work! Supps for me did nothing, almost all of them did nothing but made me poorer! Many her would disagree with me....then again, many here also agree with me. I personally find they are mostly hype, very weak and definitely underdosed. Mostly hype for sure!:icon_lol:
 
most big supplement companies use research that is open to the public anyway...most of them probably would say that research studies back up the product and or its ingredients reguardless of clinical trials if any, the science supports it!

you are just a moron if you follow "one participant gained 8.2lbs in 8 weeks" or "10,000% increase in free testosterone", (guess these adds right and i won't neg your @ss)! All are/were best case senario if not flat out lies.

do you work for muscle missions or that guy that walks into a sup shop and blindly asks for FDA approved products?

So are you agreeing with me or not?

I dont work for anyone. I dont know what you are talking about.

I like how whenever someone has an opinion that goes against the norm they are assumed to be part of "this or that crazy group of people"
 
I hate long winded boring posts. Posters....keep it to the point....skip the verbal diarreah!!!!!!


Yeah, Yeah...most supps are BS even with supposed clinical tests.


Oh im sorry that i tried to back up my argument with support instead of just blurtting out random thoughts that coursed through my mind.
 
So are you agreeing with me or not?
I dont work for anyone. I dont know what you are talking about.

I like how whenever someone has an opinion that goes against the norm they are assumed to be part of "this or that crazy group of people"

refering to muscle missions here is generally used as sarcasm, as well as FDA approved supplements. I would of figured you'd know that.

to simply answer your question...NO! you wanna tell me i got to where i am or anyone else here for that matter on clinically proven products...get the fuk outta here! next you're gonna tell me creatine is a steroid.
 
refering to muscle missions here is generally used as sarcasm, as well as FDA approved supplements. I would of figured you'd know that.

to simply answer your question...NO! you wanna tell me i got to where i am or anyone else here for that matter on clinically proven products...get the fuk outta here! next you're gonna tell me creatine is a steroid.

Yea 186lbs. Your a beast.

And were did the creatine comment come from? You probably like black shoes. Why don't we all just accuse people of random things that have nothing to do with the discussion?

Dumba##.
 
Yea 186lbs. Your a beast.

And were did the creatine comment come from? You probably like black shoes. Why don't we all just accuse people of random things that have nothing to do with the discussion?

Dumba##.

it would help you to know where i started...you must of fell off the muscletech bandwagon. here i'll help you back up!

your "discussion" is moronic. my point i thought was obvious. what good are clinical trials if the products are primarily based on public knowledge, indendant and/or double blind stuides on pretty much any ingredient you find on the labels. for what? - to further back up what the studies already show? well no sht! sure everyone hates bs supps but for every one that hates it there are probably 10 that love it, or they wouldn't of made it this far.

you're a one man marching band my friend. at least you have good intentions i guess...i just don't see what you gain from this
 
*sigh*

This thread made me remember how arguing over the net is stupid because no one ever changes their opinion or even tries to see the other peoples point of view. Instead they revert to argumentative fallacies and arbitrary insults, subtle and explicit. My argument, i believe, is pretty solid. And it basically boils down to this: Supplements that are advertised to do something should have legit clinical trials, with all the things that i talked about in check, to support the claims that the companies make for them. Seems pretty reasonable to me. But i guess that it is common knowledge that "mushroom extracts" help you build muscle. You have obviously completely missed it, and will probably never get it. Your last near incoherent post contradicted itself, and had a hefty amount of irrelevant conclusions.

BTW i'v never tried a muscletech product or any other product that didn't match the criteria of my first post.

What do I gain from this? Nothing except the satisfaction of knowing that maybe i saved one poor idiot from forking over hundreds of dollars to companies that knowingly deceive consumers, for supplements that have never been proven to do what they say.

I was bored to...

Anyway I'm out. I'm just going to assume that anymore "rebuttals" of my original argument will be as pathetic as raginfcktard's.
 
Oh im sorry that i tried to back up my argument with support instead of just blurtting out random thoughts that coursed through my mind.[/QU


i am fairly new to this but, maybe you weren't doing something right to help the product work...maybe you weren't eating enough calories/on the right diet to help your body help the product you were trying to take and then when it didn't work , instead of blaming yourself, you blamed the drug.....on the other hand, maybe the drug didn't work...everyone hates that but n e wayz who cares, getting upset and "boycotting" isn't going to change anything. Do some research ask about the quality/recommendations of products.....a lot of people on here want to help people like you and me out, to find products that are safe and actually work!!!!!:cheers:
 
So I hear about this new supplement. It is advertised well, with cool colors and catchy slogans. For some reason I really want it. The company says that it can do all these cool things, and so I buy it, and it doesn't do anything because its a bs product. I'v been foiled again. (This is a story that i'm sure many of you have played out)...


BTW i'v never tried a muscletech product or any other product that didn't match the criteria of my first post.

Astronuggets


Hmm, do I sense a contradiction?


You have obviously completely missed it, and will probably never get it. Your last near incoherent post contradicted itself, and had a hefty amount of irrelevant conclusions. ...

Anyway I'm out. I'm just going to assume that anymore "rebuttals" of my original argument will be as pathetic as raginfcktard's.

This thread made me remember how arguing over the net is stupid because no one ever changes their opinion or even tries to see the other peoples point of view. Instead they revert to argumentative fallacies and arbitrary insults, subtle and explicit...

Just stop. And don't reply to this, I dont need any more ammo lol.
 
I agree with the original poster to a point...but its all about the research and real world experiences...theres a good couple dozen compounds out there that work to some degree..out of those probably a half dozen that work REALLY well, the other 4 BILLION things out there you can ignore....but now you have to find reputable companies because lousy companies will still produce lousy versions of the stuff that has potential. No need to boycott, just do the research, and the losers from the industry will disappear eventually.
 
i'm not trying to stop anyone from taking supplements. I think supplements are pretty cool if they have been shown to be effective with real science and not marketing hype.

Personally, I find that the ideas of supplements is novel. The notion of what "works" is irrelevant. Now, if you were to say the concept of what "works for me", now then you'd have me.

I don't care what works for JoeBumFart who gained 20lbs in 3 days. I don't even really care that the University of Transylvania showed this product to be 10,000,0000X more potent than pure test. What I care about is if a product works for me. And the ONLY way that I know how to test that is to throw down a few bucks and try it for myself. How do I pick? I read ingredients, read logs, read opinions, and then base those off of the history that I have for myself.

Atleast that's how I roll. Don't know how you guys do it. ;)
 
Your an idiot on a rant.

In the pharma industry.. studies and clinical trials are done first then the drugs are released. This is because they have PATENT PROTECTION which means millions of dollars can be safely invested.

In the supplement industry you dont have patent protection, and most companies don't have millions to invest. So it is done other way around, novel compounds are released, and THEN studies are done.

You think Creatine had 100's of studies done proving its aid on athletic perfomance before being released as a supplement?
 
Personally, I find that the ideas of supplements is novel. The notion of what "works" is irrelevant. Now, if you were to say the concept of what "works for me", now then you'd have me.

I don't care what works for JoeBumFart who gained 20lbs in 3 days. I don't even really care that the University of Transylvania showed this product to be 10,000,0000X more potent than pure test. What I care about is if a product works for me. And the ONLY way that I know how to test that is to throw down a few bucks and try it for myself. How do I pick? I read ingredients, read logs, read opinions, and then base those off of the history that I have for myself.

Atleast that's how I roll. Don't know how you guys do it. ;)

i agree with this man right here. aside from divanex, which i took a few weeks ago, i have never used a supplement that is unproven. they were all proven over a loooooooooooong timeline. whey, bcaa, synthetic test;), creatine, caffeine, etc.

the divanex treated me pretty ok. i was on a 'cut' and i actually gained a few pounds on my lifts whilst doing so. then when i came off the cut in the last week, i gained a few more pounds on my lifts. overall virility and mood was elevated positively. not bad for thirty bones, right?
 
:icon_lol: That is all I have to say... I really did lol at this whole thread, although products backed up like that would be great, some products really do work, or at least provide me with the placebo to train harder! :woohoo:
 
this is why we all discuss these things...kinda the purpose of the forum. Companies sponser logs so that we can share our experiences with each other.

There are pleanty of products that people here will tell you not to waste your money on, and there are some things that people will tell you have provided great results.
 
Your an idiot on a rant.

In the pharma industry.. studies and clinical trials are done first then the drugs are released. This is because they have PATENT PROTECTION which means millions of dollars can be safely invested.

In the supplement industry you dont have patent protection, and most companies don't have millions to invest. So it is done other way around, novel compounds are released, and THEN studies are done.

You think Creatine had 100's of studies done proving its aid on athletic perfomance before being released as a supplement?

Bingo.
 
lol - you spend money on supplements? I usually just whore myself out for them. Sure, I'm sore in the morning, but if I get me some jacked fibras, then why not?!?





Yes, I am joking. ;)
 
this is why we all discuss these things...kinda the purpose of the forum. Companies sponser logs so that we can share our experiences with each other.

There are pleanty of products that people here will tell you not to waste your money on, and there are some things that people will tell you have provided great results.

Let me piss my money away however I choose.

lol

Yup, yup and yup. Now I dont have to type:head:
 
*sigh*

This thread made me remember how arguing over the net is stupid because no one ever changes their opinion or even tries to see the other peoples point of view. Instead they revert to argumentative fallacies and arbitrary insults, subtle and explicit. My argument, i believe, is pretty solid. And it basically boils down to this: Supplements that are advertised to do something should have legit clinical trials, with all the things that i talked about in check, to support the claims that the companies make for them. Seems pretty reasonable to me. But i guess that it is common knowledge that "mushroom extracts" help you build muscle. You have obviously completely missed it, and will probably never get it. Your last near incoherent post contradicted itself, and had a hefty amount of irrelevant conclusions.

BTW i'v never tried a muscletech product or any other product that didn't match the criteria of my first post.

What do I gain from this? Nothing except the satisfaction of knowing that maybe i saved one poor idiot from forking over hundreds of dollars to companies that knowingly deceive consumers, for supplements that have never been proven to do what they say.

I was bored to...

Anyway I'm out. I'm just going to assume that anymore "rebuttals" of my original argument will be as pathetic as raginfcktard's.

I agree that it would be nice for every company to run tightly controlled clinical trials of supplements before their release, but unfortunately this just isn't very realistic.

Most supplement companies simply don't have the resources to perform such studies. Innovative companies rely on 3rd party research to find new compounds to improve athletic performance. Often times, they're basing an entire product idea on little more than a few obscure journal articles...and a hunch. Sometimes they hit a home run, sometimes they have a dud.

Unfortunately, with the exception of a few companies and a few products, all of the "clinical trials" are done by the consumer. If we choose to boycott all but the "scientifically proven" supplements, that will leave us with little more than creatine monohydrate as an ergogenic aid.


In my opinion, finding new things to try is part of the fun.
 
And the ONLY way that I know how to test that is to throw down a few bucks and try it for myself. How do I pick? I read ingredients, read logs, read opinions, and then base those off of the history that I have for myself.


I 2nd that motion.....
 
Back
Top