Muscletech CLEAR MUSCLE

Page 1 of 2 12 Last
  1. New Member
    Mr.great11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Age
    44
    Posts
    6
    Rep Power
    8
    Level
    2
    Lv. Percent
    68.33%

    Muscletech CLEAR MUSCLE


    Have anyone tried this supplement.
    What was your experiences?

    In muscletech they claim that people who was the part of the research gained 16.3lbs and the strength has been increased by 170lbs in main lifts. I don't believe in this but let's hear someone who has tried this.

  2. Senior Member
    Touey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,849
    Rep Power
    3216453
    Level
    71
    Lv. Percent
    58.49%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting Pro

    nb4dook
    "To your wife you should kiss try today"-Touey

    Brotato's bark brings shakes to the pups in the yard
  3. Advanced Member
    thescience's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  190 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    515
    Rep Power
    475006
    Level
    34
    Lv. Percent
    17.1%
    Achievements Activity Pro

    ive got a few days left. i bought it after meeting a huge guy who swore buy calcium-bound hmb at 6gs a day. anyway, i havent noticed any benefits with clear; after re-reading some of the praise i came across, i noticed the reviewers were simultaneously on micro phosphatidic acid and im speculating into whether this is clouding the issue for them. that said, i am a strong responder to leucine supplementation and have not stopped running it since i started so who knows, maybe i dont see the benefits from hmb-fa because ive already got the benefit from leucine. another point about me is i dont follow the training guidlines that are catered to taking hmb; i train three times a week for about an hour and my whole thing is that i dont train too hard. im not one to be sold a training program when supp shopping, and if i had that much free time to train i wouldnt waste money on supplements.
    •   
       

  4. Board Sponsor
    Swolbraham's Avatar
    Stats
    5'5"   lbs.
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    2,273
    Rep Power
    1682979
    Level
    66
    Lv. Percent
    0.51%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting Pro

    I'm recovering ten times better and I'm in a 700 kcal deficit and 200g CHO fewer than maintenance levels. I really like it. I'm 5.5 weeks in and honestly might run it at a lower dose as a staple
    Myokem Rep - Join The Lab!
    Defy Limitations
  5. Senior Member
    The Engineer's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  160 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,602
    Rep Power
    1058881
    Level
    53
    Lv. Percent
    4.07%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by thescience View Post
    ive got a few days left. i bought it after meeting a huge guy who swore buy calcium-bound hmb at 6gs a day. anyway, i havent noticed any benefits with clear; after re-reading some of the praise i came across, i noticed the reviewers were simultaneously on micro phosphatidic acid and im speculating into whether this is clouding the issue for them. that said, i am a strong responder to leucine supplementation and have not stopped running it since i started so who knows, maybe i dont see the benefits from hmb-fa because ive already got the benefit from leucine. another point about me is i dont follow the training guidlines that are catered to taking hmb; i train three times a week for about an hour and my whole thing is that i dont train too hard. im not one to be sold a training program when supp shopping, and if i had that much free time to train i wouldnt waste money on supplements.
    Interesting thoughts.

    I think this is the first real assessment of ca-hmb that I've read where somehow isn't broing out about he gained x amount of mass.

    To me, this is still just leucine and solidifies my stance with MT about them being the worst of snake oil salesmen. If anything it also shows the sad state of affairs of the everyday lifter will be willing to spend 150$+ for a three month cycle.

    Real gear will cost less with better results.
    Curling in the squat rack results in the death penalty.
  6. Advanced Member
    thescience's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  190 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    515
    Rep Power
    475006
    Level
    34
    Lv. Percent
    17.1%
    Achievements Activity Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by The Engineer View Post
    Interesting thoughts.

    I think this is the first real assessment of ca-hmb that I've read where somehow isn't broing out about he gained x amount of mass.

    To me, this is still just leucine and solidifies my stance with MT about them being the worst of snake oil salesmen. If anything it also shows the sad state of affairs of the everyday lifter will be willing to spend 150$+ for a three month cycle.

    Real gear will cost less with better results.
    which raises another point; i can get 30 days of 6g of ca-hmb for around 10 bucks. i've seen the claims that hmb-fa is better absorbed, but ive never come across anything indicating that hmb-ca is poorly absorbed or that hmb-fa has actually been measured to be better absorbed; ive speculated that the claim to its better absorption lies in the fact that it is liquid in nature; ie the arguement that liquid supplements are better absorbed than dry ones, which very stupidly overlooks the fact that most people take their supplements with water and thus reach the same end without having to pay extra. did musletech lie anywhere? maybe not; the placebo gained 9 lbs of bodyweight, so i mean that is extraordinary and speaks to the training program. if my training program/diet has reached the point where i only gained, say 1/2lb, then clear muscle would have only added 1/6lb on top of that, so i cant say if it didnt add up to its claims. that said, they got 60 bucks out of me for this and for a product called Aplodan back in the day when i was in college and didnt know any better, so all things considered I'm biased as far as a human can get against what they make at this point. i would be interested in how people who like clear muscle respond to high dose leucine, or something like bcaa ethyl ester like i take; while only 5% of our leucine intake is said to go on to become hmb, i try to give companies the benefit of the doubt that my high leucine count, which may not equal taking hmb straight up as far as raising hmb goes, is never the less equal in terms of the benefits rendered and that those benefits do not increase when both are taken together
  7. Board Sponsor
    Royd The Noyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,337
    Rep Power
    803882
    Level
    58
    Lv. Percent
    21.17%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by thescience View Post
    which raises another point; i can get 30 days of 6g of ca-hmb for around 10 bucks. i've seen the claims that hmb-fa is better absorbed, but ive never come across anything indicating that hmb-ca is poorly absorbed or that hmb-fa has actually been measured to be better absorbed; ive speculated that the claim to its better absorption lies in the fact that it is liquid in nature; ie the arguement that liquid supplements are better absorbed than dry ones, which very stupidly overlooks the fact that most people take their supplements with water and thus reach the same end without having to pay extra. did musletech lie anywhere? maybe not; the placebo gained 9 lbs of bodyweight, so i mean that is extraordinary and speaks to the training program. if my training program/diet has reached the point where i only gained, say 1/2lb, then clear muscle would have only added 1/6lb on top of that. that said, they got 60 bucks out of me for a product called Aplodan back in the day when i was in college and didnt know any better, so all things considered I'm biased as far as a human can get against what they make at this point. i would be interested in how people who like clear muscle respond to high dose leucine, or something like bcaa ethyl ester like i take; while only 5% of our leucine intake is said to go on to become hmb, i try to give companies the benefit of the doubt that my high leucine count, which may not equal taking hmb straight up as far as raising hmb goes, is never the less equal in terms of the benefits rendered and that those benefits do not increase when both are taken together
    Where do you get ca-HMB that cheap?
    ForeRunner Labs
    The Future of Human Performance
    Please LIKE FRL on Facebook

  8. Senior Member
    The Engineer's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  160 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,602
    Rep Power
    1058881
    Level
    53
    Lv. Percent
    4.07%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by thescience View Post
    which raises another point; i can get 30 days of 6g of ca-hmb for around 10 bucks. i've seen the claims that hmb-fa is better absorbed, but ive never come across anything indicating that hmb-ca is poorly absorbed or that hmb-fa has actually been measured to be better absorbed; ive speculated that the claim to its better absorption lies in the fact that it is liquid in nature; ie the arguement that liquid supplements are better absorbed than dry ones, which very stupidly overlooks the fact that most people take their supplements with water and thus reach the same end without having to pay extra. did musletech lie anywhere? maybe not; the placebo gained 9 lbs of bodyweight, so i mean that is extraordinary and speaks to the training program. if my training program/diet has reached the point where i only gained, say 1/2lb, then clear muscle would have only added 1/6lb on top of that, so i cant say if it didnt add up to its claims. that said, they got 60 bucks out of me for this and for a product called Aplodan back in the day when i was in college and didnt know any better, so all things considered I'm biased as far as a human can get against what they make at this point. i would be interested in how people who like clear muscle respond to high dose leucine, or something like bcaa ethyl ester like i take; while only 5% of our leucine intake is said to go on to become hmb, i try to give companies the benefit of the doubt that my high leucine count, which may not equal taking hmb straight up as far as raising hmb goes, is never the less equal in terms of the benefits rendered and that those benefits do not increase when both are taken together
    I thought there's no real difference in adding an ethyl group to bcaas?
  9. Senior Member
    cbsharpe's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  225 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,704
    Rep Power
    846822
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    57.42%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Royd The Noyd View Post
    Where do you get ca-HMB that cheap?
    My thoughts exactly.....
  10. Board Sponsor
    USPlabsRep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,596
    Rep Power
    1712030
    Level
    56
    Lv. Percent
    48.7%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by cbsharpe View Post
    My thoughts exactly.....
    China at a total of 180grams
  11. Senior Member
    cbsharpe's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  225 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,704
    Rep Power
    846822
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    57.42%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by USPlabsRep View Post
    China at a total of 180grams
    Oh, okay....
  12. Advanced Member
    thescience's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  190 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    515
    Rep Power
    475006
    Level
    34
    Lv. Percent
    17.1%
    Achievements Activity Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Royd The Noyd View Post
    Where do you get ca-HMB that cheap?
    im not sure what the rule is on this forum about mentioning other sites; it may have changed recently, but last i knew i cant say beyond that i got it in powder form from an online auction and it ships from the uk 60bucks for a kilo
  13. Advanced Member
    thescience's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  190 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    515
    Rep Power
    475006
    Level
    34
    Lv. Percent
    17.1%
    Achievements Activity Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by The Engineer View Post
    I thought there's no real difference in adding an ethyl group to bcaas?
    well, there is certainly alot of info on forums against it; high dose leucine enables me to drastically add weight to my lifts; bcaa ethy ester has enabled me to keep that strength; at one point i backed off leucine and lost it eventually, and then regained the exact amount of strengh when adding bcaa ethyl ester; its ridiculously overpriced, but only 3 caps a day and im there
  14. Senior Member
    The Engineer's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  160 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,602
    Rep Power
    1058881
    Level
    53
    Lv. Percent
    4.07%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by thescience View Post
    well, there is certainly alot of info on forums against it; high dose leucine enables me to drastically add weight to my lifts; bcaa ethy ester has enabled me to keep that strength; at one point i backed off leucine and lost it eventually, and then regained the exact amount of strengh when adding bcaa ethyl ester; its ridiculously overpriced, but only 3 caps a day and im there
    How high do you normally dose leucine pre-workout? Max I've done is 8gm from a 4:1:1 bcaa.
    Curling in the squat rack results in the death penalty.
  15. Advanced Member
    thescience's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  190 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    515
    Rep Power
    475006
    Level
    34
    Lv. Percent
    17.1%
    Achievements Activity Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by The Engineer View Post

    How high do you normally dose leucine pre-workout? Max I've done is 8gm from a 4:1:1 bcaa.
    I dont take it preworkout. Plenty of guys do the 7g twice daily, which is a good protocall made famous in large part by muscletech actually (leukic anyone?). I found i didnt have to take that much and settled for less; sort of jard to calculate how much less because i shifted to a product called leuca-lyn which in my experience was hands down the best leucine supp of all time, that was unfortunately made by a company that got raided and shut down from what people have claimed. The stuff was dirt cheap, liposomal, and sustained release. Strangely, i put my old man on the leucine protocal and he experienced no benefits whatsoever. Anyway, i started with bcaa ethyl ester because i couldnt help but notice that the people bashing that form repped for companies that sell creatine monohydrate and all anyone has to do is mention that they like cee better than mono on a creatine forum board to get ten reps on their jock; creatine is a big money maker with way too many companies eating from the same plate, so its competitive. Anyway, theres a company, nutrabio, that specializes in aminos. Thats what they do. They believe in ethyl ester,.and if u call them and get transferred to one of their wizards, it becomes evident theyre pretty smart. They said there are alot of ethyl ester formulations that literally just have the amino dumped into the tub with the ethyl ester, and thus u have user experience reflective of the ingestion of two totally separate substances with no benefit to absorption. Also, the guy who "invented" creatine mono himself advocated creatine ethyl ester over mono. He wrote a book on it
  16. New Member
    changemyoil66's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  198 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    83
    Rep Power
    101276
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    98.81%

    Op when ever you see a claim on an advertisement, it probably meant 1 guy achieved this, and that isn't the average. HMB would probably be most beneficial on a cut to try and preserve muscle.

    Also MT's logs they are running now has you doing a set workout routine. So keep in mind anytime a new routine is being done, there will be huge gains in the first few months. Example i just started doing close stance squats. In 1 month I went from doing 225x5 to 365x3.
    1000lbs Club
  17. Advanced Member
    thescience's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  190 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    515
    Rep Power
    475006
    Level
    34
    Lv. Percent
    17.1%
    Achievements Activity Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by changemyoil66 View Post
    So keep in mind anytime a new routine is being done, there will be huge gains in the first few months. Example i just started doing close stance squats. In 1 month I went from doing 225x5 to 365x3.
    Exactly. If i woke up one day and found i was.on a new regime that had me working out all the time, i would very naturally start eating more to buffer the workload. Thats why i think even the placebo gained 9lbs of bodyweight . I also think that could explain the strength increase. All in all, i think mt played a fair game; bthe supp just wasnt made for a guy with my goals and circumstances. Im still waiting to hear about an absorption comparison between forms. for the money, it would have to be 12x better absorbed. i will be trying huge doses of ca-hmb whenever my bag decides to arrive. "Ask not what your supplement can do for you, but what you can do for your supplement" seems to apply here with regards to adding strength and bodyweight from this. Nice change with the squats bro.
  18. Board Sponsor
    SwolenONE's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    4,332
    Rep Power
    1220799
    Level
    59
    Lv. Percent
    87.76%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityPosting Pro

    Ive been hearing great things from some people I really trust. My bottle gets here tomorrow!! Need anything I can to help me bulk at this point, definitely at a sticking point getting past a bodyweight of 240lbs while staying fairly clean body fat wise.
    Molecular Nutrition - Unlevel The Field
    X-Factor: THE Most Scientifically Valid Muscle Builder, Ever!
    Sign up for INSANE deals via our newsletter: www.mninsider.com
  19. New Member
    changemyoil66's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  198 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    83
    Rep Power
    101276
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    98.81%

    HMB is most beneficial on a cut to preserve muslce. It wont do much if you're on a bulk.
    1000lbs Club
  20. Advanced Member
    MultiVitamin's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  195 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    559
    Rep Power
    978788
    Level
    44
    Lv. Percent
    54.75%
    Achievements Activity Pro

    I'm one of the beta(alpha)-testers of FaHMB, and I've experienced a 137lb increase between my big 3... Now mind you, I've only been squatting (atleast consistently) since January, and DL'ing since Feb. Honestly I believe this first phase of the routine is completely irrelevant to the supplement (essentially S/B/DL on M/W/F).

    You can take almost any forum mongerler (like myself) who trains in a bro sense (or a BB sense in mine, and others cases), and throw them on a PL-type routine and watch their lifts jump. Obviously my big 3 are going to jump, and jump big, it's practically the only thing I've done, and lived for (in the gym) for the last 8 weeks.

    Now if I'd made these gains on my regular routine (usually run PHAT for 3mon, twice a year) I'd be ecstatic, and confidently could stand behind this. I'd like to say I believe the next phase (Overreching/OT phase) will be the real test, but I'm not too sure it is...

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but can't OT/OR for a short period of time be effective for anyone?? I'm assuming especially after a low volume kind of routine like this... So of course these next two weeks of training my ass off (and more than likely eating my ass off) is going to illicit some kind of gains... Perfect idea, eh? And most of the loggers probably won't catch this and owe it all to FaHMB

    Honestly, i don't dislike MT (as I once did), and I'm actually very greatful to have this opportunity (and also be given over $200 worth of supps... hnnng).... But I really don't think it'd be fair for me to give a "real" review of this after forcefully being made to run this routine, that's obviously going to give gains (esp for someone like me)
    Menace Nutrition Board Rep

    Use code ANABOLIC for 40% off all website deals
  21. New Member
    NewAgeMayan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    178
    Rep Power
    122418
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    81.3%

    Ive been using CM for just over 4 weeks now, running my own routine (high volume/frequency with built-in overreach and deload).

    Im eating in a slight cal surplus, and in this time Ive noticed some recomping that I am confident is due to CM (scale weight increased 2.5lb, stomach measurement decreased 1inch); I have never ever experienced this before.

    In the first 2 weeks CM had no noticeable effect on my training numbers, and it wasnt until I hit the overreach phase in week 3 that this changed (and quite dramatically too).

    Would I purchase CM again? Im not sure, to be honest. If it were half its current price Id be tempted to make it a staple, or maybe if I got the same effects from it at half the dose. Not sure Id want to experiment with the latter, though.
  22. New Member
    NewAgeMayan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    178
    Rep Power
    122418
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    81.3%

    Quote Originally Posted by MultiVitamin View Post
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but can't OT/OR for a short period of time be effective for anyone??
    Personally I dont think 'overtraining' and 'overreaching' are equivalent, though I think they do share some similarities (they are certainly not absolute isolated opposites).

    If you're onto it with timing your deload, then yes I think overreaching can be effective for 'anyone' (whether you are pure strength training, or more hypertrophy focused). However, whether OR-ing is 'optimal' for any particular trainee would depend on their training exposure/experience.
  23. New Member
    NewAgeMayan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    178
    Rep Power
    122418
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    81.3%

    Quote Originally Posted by TheStalker View Post
    Maybe the price will drop in the futur
    Possible, but in the 50% range? I doubt it. If MT representatives are to be believed, HMBfa is expensive to produce (as reflected in the price).

    Id actually be prepared to regularly pay the current selling price if the product outperformed, significantly, all the other anabolic supplements (PA, ABE, ArA, Folli, etc). But that is something else I highly doubt.
  24. New Member
    NewAgeMayan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    178
    Rep Power
    122418
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    81.3%

    Quote Originally Posted by TheStalker View Post
    I dont think i have see one good log about clear muscle , with real result not just good recovery
    Most of the logs Ive seen involve the 'trainhard' program (supposedly) from Wilson's study. Id much prefer to see CM being used by trainees in other programs.
  25. Senior Member
    The Engineer's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  160 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,602
    Rep Power
    1058881
    Level
    53
    Lv. Percent
    4.07%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by NewAgeMayan View Post
    Most of the logs Ive seen involve the 'trainhard' program (supposedly) from Wilson's study. Id much prefer to see CM being used by trainees in other programs.
    I second this.

    I'd like to see it specifically used in a high volume/hypertrophy program.
    Curling in the squat rack results in the death penalty.
  26. Board Sponsor
    Royd The Noyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,337
    Rep Power
    803882
    Level
    58
    Lv. Percent
    21.17%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by NewAgeMayan View Post
    Most of the logs Ive seen involve the 'trainhard' program (supposedly) from Wilson's study. Id much prefer to see CM being used by trainees in other programs.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Engineer View Post
    I second this.

    I'd like to see it specifically used in a high volume/hypertrophy program.
    Why? Didn't they gain a ****load in that program? Maybe it's worth a try.
    ForeRunner Labs
    The Future of Human Performance
    Please LIKE FRL on Facebook

  27. New Member
    NewAgeMayan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    178
    Rep Power
    122418
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    81.3%

    Quote Originally Posted by Royd The Noyd View Post
    Why? Didn't they gain a ****load in that program? Maybe it's worth a try.
    Wilson said the test subjects were selected specifically because they would be 'high responders' to the training protocol. Read into that what you will, but the crucial thing here is this: how you personally respond to any particular program will depend largely on 2 things.

    1) Your short-term training environment; ie what you have become adapted to 'recently', how detrained you are currently, current volume tolerance etc etc

    2) Your long-term training environment; ie how advanced you are in terms of your progress rate capacity

    Both these factors are of course related. But I take it as given and understood that the more advanced you are then the 'slower/lesser' your progress capacity is regardless of programming. Further to this, the more advanced you are the more likely you will have to 'move away' from cookie-cutter programs...your training protocols will become more individualized.

    Cliffs: depending on your training capacity you may find the program from the study underwhelming and subsequently get jack from it.
  28. Senior Member
    Touey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,849
    Rep Power
    3216453
    Level
    71
    Lv. Percent
    58.49%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by NewAgeMayan View Post
    Wilson said the test subjects were
    much ado about nothing
    "To your wife you should kiss try today"-Touey

    Brotato's bark brings shakes to the pups in the yard
  29. Senior Member
    Touey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,849
    Rep Power
    3216453
    Level
    71
    Lv. Percent
    58.49%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by TheStalker View Post
    I dont think i have see one good log about clear muscle , with real result not just good recovery
    few and far between
    "To your wife you should kiss try today"-Touey

    Brotato's bark brings shakes to the pups in the yard
  30. Board Sponsor
    Royd The Noyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,337
    Rep Power
    803882
    Level
    58
    Lv. Percent
    21.17%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by NewAgeMayan View Post
    Wilson said the test subjects were selected specifically because they would be 'high responders' to the training protocol. Read into that what you will, but the crucial thing here is this: how you personally respond to any particular program will depend largely on 2 things.

    1) Your short-term training environment; ie what you have become adapted to 'recently', how detrained you are currently, current volume tolerance etc etc

    2) Your long-term training environment; ie how advanced you are in terms of your progress rate capacity

    Both these factors are of course related. But I take it as given and understood that the more advanced you are then the 'slower/lesser' your progress capacity is regardless of programming. Further to this, the more advanced you are the more likely you will have to 'move away' from cookie-cutter programs...your training protocols will become more individualized.

    Cliffs: depending on your training capacity you may find the program from the study underwhelming and subsequently get jack from it.
    Doesn't Wilson use 400lb minimum squatters? I don't think most people would be underwhelmed. But who knows everyone online is Phil Heath.
    ForeRunner Labs
    The Future of Human Performance
    Please LIKE FRL on Facebook

  31. New Member
    NewAgeMayan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    178
    Rep Power
    122418
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    81.3%

    Quote Originally Posted by Royd The Noyd View Post
    Doesn't Wilson use 400lb minimum squatters? I don't think most people would be underwhelmed. But who knows everyone online is Phil Heath.
    I think the average squat max at the start of the study was around 315.
  32. Elite Member
    Young Gotti's Avatar
    Stats
    5'5"  100 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    5,444
    Rep Power
    1292453
    Level
    61
    Lv. Percent
    69.18%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by Royd The Noyd View Post
    Doesn't Wilson use 400lb minimum squatters? I don't think most people would be underwhelmed. But who knows everyone online is Phil Heath.
    you called?
  33. Board Sponsor
    Royd The Noyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,337
    Rep Power
    803882
    Level
    58
    Lv. Percent
    21.17%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by Young Gotti View Post
    you called?
    You're more like Dusty Hanshaw.
    ForeRunner Labs
    The Future of Human Performance
    Please LIKE FRL on Facebook

  34. Elite Member
    Young Gotti's Avatar
    Stats
    5'5"  100 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    5,444
    Rep Power
    1292453
    Level
    61
    Lv. Percent
    69.18%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by Royd The Noyd View Post
    You're more like Dusty Hanshaw.
    oh if only i had a wife like his to make me brown sugar oatmeal protean food....mmm
  35. Board Sponsor
    SwolenONE's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    4,332
    Rep Power
    1220799
    Level
    59
    Lv. Percent
    87.76%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by NewAgeMayan View Post
    Ive been using CM for just over 4 weeks now, running my own routine (high volume/frequency with built-in overreach and deload).

    Im eating in a slight cal surplus, and in this time Ive noticed some recomping that I am confident is due to CM (scale weight increased 2.5lb, stomach measurement decreased 1inch); I have never ever experienced this before.

    In the first 2 weeks CM had no noticeable effect on my training numbers, and it wasnt until I hit the overreach phase in week 3 that this changed (and quite dramatically too).

    Would I purchase CM again? Im not sure, to be honest. If it were half its current price Id be tempted to make it a staple, or maybe if I got the same effects from it at half the dose. Not sure Id want to experiment with the latter, though.
    This, I think if the price were lower it would be a no brainer staple for all serious weightlifters. The science is promising, the anecdotal reports on recovery are as well. Beginning my dosing today with high hopes as I train with a lot of volume.
    Molecular Nutrition - Unlevel The Field
    X-Factor: THE Most Scientifically Valid Muscle Builder, Ever!
    Sign up for INSANE deals via our newsletter: www.mninsider.com
  36. New Member
    changemyoil66's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  198 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    83
    Rep Power
    101276
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    98.81%

    @MultiVitamin,

    Although I cant take your 137lbs increase into factor due to the fact that you just started doing squats and deads, but I am curious how much alone did your bench go up, and body weight?
    1000lbs Club
  37. New Member
    djwolford's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  202 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Age
    31
    Posts
    54
    Rep Power
    4109
    Level
    10
    Lv. Percent
    52.24%

    Quote Originally Posted by NewAgeMayan View Post
    Ive been using CM for just over 4 weeks now, running my own routine (high volume/frequency with built-in overreach and deload).

    Im eating in a slight cal surplus, and in this time Ive noticed some recomping that I am confident is due to CM (scale weight increased 2.5lb, stomach measurement decreased 1inch); I have never ever experienced this before.

    In the first 2 weeks CM had no noticeable effect on my training numbers, and it wasnt until I hit the overreach phase in week 3 that this changed (and quite dramatically too).

    Would I purchase CM again? Im not sure, to be honest. If it were half its current price Id be tempted to make it a staple, or maybe if I got the same effects from it at half the dose. Not sure Id want to experiment with the latter, though.
    I'm in the same boat. Especially given that you can almost buy a decent six week run of cell tech for the price and make better gains.

    It's helped a bit in my strength training and recovery, but is kinda underwhelming for the price.

    Great product; too expensive is would be my four word review.
    Bulking to 225, eating pwo straight from the tub... oh yeah and also I'm a banana.
    b245, s275, d365 (885 total/1000 goal)
  38. New Member
    NewAgeMayan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    178
    Rep Power
    122418
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    81.3%

    Swolen and dj...it really seems to come down to one thing: is CM 70$ better than placebo? Speaking for myself, at this stage it is certainly 'something' better than nothing/placebo, but not 70$ better. You may yet come to a more favourable conclusion though, swolen.
  39. New Member
    djwolford's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  202 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Age
    31
    Posts
    54
    Rep Power
    4109
    Level
    10
    Lv. Percent
    52.24%

    Quote Originally Posted by NewAgeMayan View Post
    Swolen and dj...it really seems to come down to one thing: is CM 70$ better than placebo? Speaking for myself, at this stage it is certainly 'something' better than nothing/placebo, but not 70$ better. You may yet come to a more favourable conclusion though, swolen.
    Nope, and that's coming from a MT fanboy. I actually enjoy most of their products a lot.

    I'm also an honest reviewer though, and no, I wouldn't pay that for it. And it's not just $70, because it took 3 weeks for me to notice it working. If you don't run 2-3 months you're wasting your time.

    I'll recommend their various proteins, Nitro tech, creacore, nanovapor and neurocore... probably a few more. I couldn't recommenbd CM though unless cost is no issue.
    Bulking to 225, eating pwo straight from the tub... oh yeah and also I'm a banana.
    b245, s275, d365 (885 total/1000 goal)
  40. Advanced Member
    Colbert's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  220 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    823
    Rep Power
    170667
    Level
    29
    Lv. Percent
    74.67%

    I got a lot better results with it by stacking it with Cell tech.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Clear muscle, casual log, share your experiences!
    By fightnews in forum Supplements
    Replies: 236
    Last Post: 08-25-2014, 12:19 PM
  2. Clear Muscle???
    By bert45 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-17-2014, 12:03 PM
  3. For Sale: ALMOST new MuscleTech NanoVapor (Muscle Builders)
    By borobulker in forum Supplement Auction
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-05-2008, 10:32 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in