LTX said:The dates are at least a year old. Did anything come of it?
stxnas said:That list seemed a little excessive, but I don't quite understand why some of it was listed in the first place - IE the stevia products.
stxnas said:That list seemed a little excessive, but I don't quite understand why some of it was listed in the first place - IE the stevia products.
mrcoolboy15 said:Has anyone else heard of companies getting messed with by the fda?
mrcoolboy15 said:how many points do you have to have to post a signature?
amac said:i'm just wondering what the difference is between them having misleading statements etc. on bb.com's product descriptions... and an ad like one i have read for the mass stack, saying it restructures your DNA for muscle building....
how are they allowed to print something like the latter? its garbage, and though i'm sure it increases sales in the 16 year old population 10 fold, is just plain irresponsible in my mind...
and i know that basically all ads in magazines are along those lines, but i'm just wondering why there is no fight from the fda about those ads... is it because they have the little disclaimer saying it isnt meant to treat disease or whatever it says at the bottom?
julius kelp said:just wait, if the liberal dems take over in 2008, vitamin c will be prescription only
Jack of Shadows said:Yep...lords knows those conservative repugnantcans are not futzing with our rights.