First, they're all real gear. They all serve their purpose just differently.meaning using the needle vs poping pills.. whats better and why?
those are all valid points but wouldnt you agree that orals are harder on the body in the big picture?First, they're all real gear. They all serve their purpose just differently.
There are pro's & con's to both. To make orals bioavailable they are methylated which brings about some concerns regarding hepatotoxicity. They do kick in much quicker than most IM, esterfied AAS (unless you are using a suspension of base hormones which is usually more painful and needs to be done daily). I do believe both oral and IM have some similar risks e.g. cholestasis.
I found this at one time:
Invalid Link Removed
Defintiely. Especially if you were to consider the duration i.e. 12 weeks of Test E vs 12 weeks of Oral Stanazol.those are all valid points but wouldnt you agree that orals are harder on the body in the big picture?
:wtf: not too sharp are ya?so do orals?
They serve their purpose. Limited/minimal risk if done correctly. Some of the negatives have been unfairly overhyped.so WHY do orals? heatlh wise
They serve their purpose. Limited/minimal risk if done correctly. Some of the negatives have been unfairly overhyped.
and based off those who abuse.My Dad and Step-Mom's family is full of regular drinkers who do get drunk quite regularly(drunks)None of them have,and likely won't,develop health problems,it takes an extremist like an alcoholic.The world is full of regular drinkers,yet when you hear of problems it's people that go to aa meetings and try to quit but can't.They drink when they wake up and during jobs when they have one,pretty much 24-7,and usually stright liquor.This even takes a while to start causing serious problems.