........fatty foods are even more damaging to people's health than steroid precursors

  1. Registered User
    windwords7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    2,318
    Rep Power
    1565

    ........fatty foods are even more damaging to people's health than steroid precursors


    <DIV class=hed>On Steroids?
    </DIV>
    <DIV class=dek><I>The Times</I> bulks up its anti-supplement coverage.
    </DIV>
    <DIV class=byline>By Ronald Bailey

    </DIV><IMG alt="" hspace=1 src="http://reason.com/reason/shared/graphics/divider.gif" border=0>
    <IMG alt="" src="http://reason.com/reason/shared/graphics/dotclear.gif" vspace=5 border=0>

    <DIV class=bodytext><I>The New York Times</I> and <I>The Washington Post</I> are now flogging the latest drug crisis—over-the-counter steroid precursors.

    Steroids are a class of compounds that mimic the effects of the male sex hormone testosterone. The pre-modern era (circa 1880) of steroids initiated by French physiologist Charles Edouard Brown-Sequard involved injecting crushed dog and guinea pig testicles. Scientists in the 1930s succeeded in synthesizing testosterone. Supplementary steroid use began expanding in the 1950s, when Soviet Olympic athletes started using it to improve their performance. Since 1990, the Federal government has outlawed the sale of a variety of steroids except for medical purposes.

    Since 1990, clever chemists, working for the supplement industry, have devised compounds which they claim are precursors to testosterone. And by now anyone connected to the Internet has been spammed hundreds of times with emails touting the effectiveness of these precursors in building muscle and reducing fat. Does the sale of over-the-counter steroid supplements constitute a societal emergency requiring intervention by the Feds? No. "Where is the societal damage?" asked supplement company Syntrax Innovations' founder Derek Cornelius in <I>The Washington Post</I>. "[Critics] would have a point if people were having bad side effects, if people were dying in hospitals, but it's not happening. It's like making an issue out of something that's not."

    However, steroids and their precursors do have some negative side effects that vary among users depending on how much they use and their specific genetics. Short-term effects include acne and shrunken testicles (which are generally reversed after users stop taking the supplements). Long-term effects may include stunted growth in teenagers, liver damage, enhanced risk of heart disease and prostate cancer. But these are not unusual risks. People balance these types of risks versus benefits all the time.

    Of course perfectly legal substances such as alcohol, cigarettes, and fatty foods are even more damaging to people's health than steroid precursors, but our society has not seen fit to ban adult use of them yet (though a cadre of health puritans is working ceaselessly to do just that). What about the children? Our society has had no problem imposing limits on access to alcohol to people under age 21 and cigarettes to those under age 18. Similar restrictions could be established if steroid precursors are shown to be truly harmful to teenagers. One should not infantilize society by using possible harm to children as an excuse to deny adults access to products and services they can appropriately and safely use.

    But what if supplement manufacturers defraud consumers? We already have plenty of laws and agencies that are fully empowered to protect consumers against fraud.

    The question comes down to whether people can be trusted to use such substances responsibly. The answer, of course, is that not everyone will. But that does not mean that the majority of those who would behave responsibly should be forbidden access to enhancements that they regard as beneficial.

    For example, there is evidence that overuse of steroidal substances causes some few people to become excessively aggressive, the so-called "roid rage" phenomenon. However, we hold drunks responsible for their actions; similarly society should have no difficulty holding roid ragers accountable. In fact, <I>The New York Times</I> underscores this point when it notes that steroid user Patrick Keogan stopped taking it after he became so angry during a traffic incident that he allowed his car to drift away while he argued with another motorist. Clearly users like Keogan can and do take responsibility for their actions.

    Private sports organizations like the International Olympics Committee and the National Football League certainly have the right to ban their athletes from using steroid precursors if they wish, but they don't have the right to ask the Feds to take care of their policing problems by banning the use of steroids by ordinary citizens who want to lose fat or look better.

    On the evidence marshaled so far by supplement critics, the bottom line is that we don't need to open a new anti-steroid front in an already highly destructive and failing War on Drugs.



    </DIV><IMG height=10 alt="" src="http://reason.com/reason/shared/graphics/dotclear.gif" width=1 border=0>
    Ronald Bailey is Reason's science correspondent. </I>[/URL]

  2. Registered User
    scotty2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    on the pay no mind list
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,140
    Rep Power
    715

    Wow, Jake, you're really on top of this ****, good work, bro.
  3. Registered User
    pogue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    428
    Rep Power
    14010

    Wow, a positive article from the mass media. Amazing!
    •   
       

  4. Registered User
    Sean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    163
    Rep Power
    226

    Yeah. Amazing - truly amazing.
  5. Banned
    YellowJacket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    In front of a computer. At all times.
    Posts
    0
    Rep Power
    0

    Good post Jake....you could move this to the steroid section if you'd like, I know SHOT would enjoy the read.....
  6. Registered User
    windwords7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    2,318
    Rep Power
    1565

    Thanks bro's. I found it interesting to finally see some accurate press for the most part.
  7. Registered User
    ex_banana-eater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    377
    Rep Power
    332

    awesome bro, can i get a link... just cuz i wanna spread it around.
  8. Registered User
    windwords7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    2,318
    Rep Power
    1565

    Originally posted by ex_banana-eater
    awesome bro, can i get a link... just cuz i wanna spread it around.
    &nbsp;

    Just link to this thread bro.
  9. Registered User
    weissmuller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    PA USA
    Age
    28
    Posts
    57
    Rep Power
    172

    Nice article.

    &nbsp;

    Its hard as hell to find a decent article on hormones and their precursors anymore.&nbsp; If only this style could replace the ones bashing use of such products.
  10. Avant's #1 Stunna'
    Board Sponsor
    Sir Savage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    32
    Posts
    2,082
    Rep Power
    1185

    Very good article. I'm amazed, really.

    Good stuff, Jake.
  11. Registered User
    windwords7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    2,318
    Rep Power
    1565

    Thanks guys! I assume your giving me Karma for this? It's a great article, about time already!
  12. Registered User
    UnrealMachine's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  218 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Questing for beast status
    Posts
    6,083
    Rep Power
    5024

    gave you karma bro
  13. Registered User
    Mass_69's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  220 lbs.
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,550
    Rep Power
    3036

    Dude, this guy hasn't posted since March 2005. I guess it's the thought that counts, though.
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-13-2011, 09:13 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-28-2009, 05:06 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-24-2009, 07:37 PM
  4. people are getting more stupid
    By pudgy in forum General Chat
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-28-2006, 12:44 AM
  5. Caffeine May Leave People More Open to Persuasion, Study Shows
    By yeahright in forum Nutrition / Health
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-12-2006, 04:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in