M-Drol not as strong muscle building chemical compound as original AX Superdrol?

Page 1 of 4 123 ... Last
  1. New Member
    Lukass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    96
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    28.2%

    M-Drol not as strong muscle building chemical compound as original AX Superdrol?


    5a-androstane = etioallocholane (Original early Superdrol)

    5b-androstane = etiocholane (M-Drol / Most new Superdrol clones)

    Etiocholane (in M-Drol) refers to the 5 beta isomer, not the 5 alpha(In AX Superdrol). 5 beta's are not known for their anabolic/androgenic properties...

    Itís my understanding that Superdrolís compound is: 2a, 17a-di methyl-5a-androstane-3-one-17b-ol, and has the target hormone 5aa, which is much stronger than M-Drol (M-Drol targets 5b.)

    So I think M-Drol is something like this: (You can buy it in bulk in powder form).

    Etiocholan-3a-ol-17-one
    5b-Androsterone; Etiocholanone; 3a-Hydroxy-5b-androstan-17-one
    C19H30O2 F.W. 290.45 CAS: 53-42-9


    And original AX Superdrol is - 2a, 17a-di methyl-5a-androstane/androsterone-3-one-17b-ol,

    And again, CEL'S M-Drol is 5b,... So my question is, does this explain why Alot of people I know have had better results with the original Superdrol? (Including me).

    The reason I ask is because I bought a bottle of M-Drol, So for all you chemists, Is M-Drol really weaker? Or should my 5alpha and 5 beta research not even pose a big concern.

    Im thinking it is weaker, and CEL knows it, too. If I am wrong, ill be HAPPY, because I want my M-Drol to put at least 6 lbs on me... If it is much weaker I aint even gonna take it!

  2. Professional Member
    MentalTwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,516
    Rep Power
    2355
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    80.32%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukass View Post
    5a-androstane = etioallocholane (Original early Superdrol)

    5b-androstane = etiocholane (M-Drol / Most new Superdrol clones)

    Etiocholane (in M-Drol) refers to the 5 beta isomer, not the 5 alpha(In AX Superdrol). 5 beta's are not known for their anabolic/androgenic properties...

    Itís my understanding that Superdrolís compound is: 2a, 17a-di methyl-5a-androstane-3-one-17b-ol, and has the target hormone 5aa, which is much stronger than M-Drol (M-Drol targets 5b.)

    So I think M-Drol is something like this: (You can buy it in bulk in powder form).

    Etiocholan-3a-ol-17-one
    5b-Androsterone; Etiocholanone; 3a-Hydroxy-5b-androstan-17-one
    C19H30O2 F.W. 290.45 CAS: 53-42-9


    And original AX Superdrol is - 2a, 17a-di methyl-5a-androstane/androsterone-3-one-17b-ol,

    And again, CEL'S M-Drol is 5b,... So my question is, does this explain why Alot of people I know have had better results with the original Superdrol? (Including me).

    The reason I ask is because I bought a bottle of M-Drol, So for all you chemists, Is M-Drol really weaker? Or should my 5alpha and 5 beta research not even pose a big concern.

    Im thinking it is weaker, and CEL knows it, too. If I am wrong, ill be HAPPY, because I want my M-Drol to put at least 6 lbs on me... If it is much weaker I aint even gonna take it!
    Your comments are a lil out of line. Search and youll find plenty on it. I hope im wrong but with a post like this and its your only/first im guessin youre just tryint o stir things up.
    Im not sure about how the compounds compare but there is plenty of people happy with it and other CEL products.
  3. Bananas
    TripDog's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  201 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    10,084
    Rep Power
    5551
    Level
    62
    Lv. Percent
    41.58%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Interesting,i have a few bottles of both and not sure how the structures are different. I am by no means a chemist.
    The LORD is my rock, my fortress, and my savior; my God is my rock, in whom I find protection. He is my shield, the power that saves me, and my place of safety.-Psalm 18:2
    •   
       

  4. Board Sponsor
    rpen22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,702
    Rep Power
    11093
    Level
    42
    Lv. Percent
    12.93%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    That's actually very interesting. I, myself, never noticed M-Drol's nomenclature was different from the original Methasteron(because I've never used either).
  5. New Member
    Lukass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    96
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    28.2%

    Quote Originally Posted by MentalTwitch View Post
    Your comments are a lil out of line. Search and youll find plenty on it. I hope im wrong but with a post like this and its your only/first im guessin youre just tryint o stir things up.
    Im not sure about how the compounds compare but there is plenty of people happy with it and other CEL products.

    Out of line?

    CEL woulndt be offended... they are a company. And I said I might be wrong.

    Im not trying to "stir things up", what the heck are you talking about.

    So what if it was my first post, I just want an answer from someone who knows and ill never return to this forum again if it makes you happy unless I have another good question.

    Search and you'll find plenty?

    Dude, ive been searching M-Drol and Superdrol about as deep as anyone can search.

    I know it works for some people, im searching for the more advanced details.

    Im sorry but your comments came off as rude to me, anyhow sorry if I was rude to you... and im done arguing. Now back to my question.
  6. Professional Member
    MentalTwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,516
    Rep Power
    2355
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    80.32%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Wasnt callin youout at all. i never do that to people, not my style. Anyways, i wish i knew more about chem structure but the only thing i can think of is...
    Maybe they chnaged it a bit to keep it from gettin banned right away or at all?

    I dont care if you stay its just i get skeptical on some people casue there have been alot of trolls around here. I know things at BB.com are gettin uptight to(no im not over there)
    I hope you stay becasue there are alot of smart guys around here, please excuse how i came across and i hope you get your answers

    back to the thread.
  7. Banned
    Travis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,966
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    53.51%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    PM CompEdgeLabs a link to your question. I'm guessing they are more than willing to answer.
    Last edited by Travis; 11-09-2007 at 12:16 AM. Reason: Edit: I did it....bored.
  8. New Member
    Lukass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    96
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    28.2%

    Quote Originally Posted by MentalTwitch View Post
    Wasnt callin youout at all. i never do that to people, not my style. Anyways, i wish i knew more about chem structure but the only thing i can think of is...
    Maybe they chnaged it a bit to keep it from gettin banned right away or at all?

    I dont care if you stay its just i get skeptical on some people casue there have been alot of trolls around here. I know things at BB.com are gettin uptight to(no im not over there)
    I hope you stay becasue there are alot of smart guys around here, please excuse how i came across and i hope you get your answers

    back to the thread.

    Thanks man. I dont want to argue with anyone. I just want my answers! Dont worry im not a Troll, I just registered just so I could get an answer to this 1 question! Because im hungry for knowledge.
  9. Registered User
    UNCfan1's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,948
    Rep Power
    1066
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    87.68%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    I am no chemist either, but good catch. Hopefully some of the guys that know more about chemical structures will chime in.
  10. New Member
    Lukass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    96
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    28.2%

    Quote Originally Posted by UNCfan1 View Post
    I am no chemist either, but good catch. Hopefully some of the guys that know more about chemical structures will chime in.

    Yea im not bragging but I think it is a pretty good question. M-Drol truly could be weaker do to the 5b target as opposed to the 5a targeted isomer.

    And after all, Alpha > Beta.
  11. Board Sponsor
    rpen22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,702
    Rep Power
    11093
    Level
    42
    Lv. Percent
    12.93%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    It definitely looks as if M-Drol is the 5 beta isomer, unless they somehow misprinted the labels with a typo.

    This is from "carcinogen" on bb.com:

    Quote Originally Posted by carcinogen View Post
    I just want to make people aware that etiocholane refers to the 5 beta isomer, not the 5 alpha. 5 beta's are not known for their anabolic/androgenic properties...
  12. Registered User
    UNCfan1's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,948
    Rep Power
    1066
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    87.68%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukass View Post
    Yea im not bragging but I think it is a pretty good question. M-Drol truly could be weaker to to the 5b as opposed to 5a isomer.
    I wouldn't doubt it being weaker. Feedback on the clones are mixed but M-drol did get the best. Could be cause it was used the most. I remember Dr.D stating that the AX Superdrol was the only pure form of SD out. If its 5b what kind of effects would that give the user? I am lucky to be sitting on some AX SD.
  13. New Member
    Lukass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    96
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    28.2%

    Quote Originally Posted by rpen22 View Post
    It definitely looks as if M-Drol is the 5 beta isomer, unless they somehow misprinted the labels with a typo.

    This is from "carcinogen" on bb.com:
    Yea that was one of my few sources. I just hope M-Drol is at least "Strong enough" you know what I mean? Because I want to take it and gain over 6 lbs.
  14. New Member
    Lukass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    96
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    28.2%

    Quote Originally Posted by UNCfan1 View Post
    I wouldn't doubt it being weaker. Feedback on the clones are mixed but M-drol did get the best. Could be cause it was used the most. I remember Dr.D stating that the AX Superdrol was the only pure form of superdrol out. If its 5b what kind of effects would that give the user? I am lucky to be sitting on some AX SD.

    Nice.

    Im lucky too, I have some M1T.
  15. Professional Member
    MentalTwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,516
    Rep Power
    2355
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    80.32%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    The Twitchs new begining.

    Up 4-5 lbs on day 8.
  16. Professional Member
    MentalTwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,516
    Rep Power
    2355
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    80.32%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukass View Post
    Nice.

    Im lucky too, I have some M1T.
    I would be down for M1T but reviews on sides to gains are sooooo mixed it scares me a bit.
  17. Registered User
    UNCfan1's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,948
    Rep Power
    1066
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    87.68%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukass View Post
    Nice.

    Im lucky too, I have some M1T.
    I hear u, feel free to let me try out SD's older brother.

    Nice gains so far Twitch.
  18. Registered User
    UNCfan1's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,948
    Rep Power
    1066
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    87.68%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    He is at DA so I will ask him about it.
  19. New Member
    Lukass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    96
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    28.2%

    I got arrested 2 weeks into a M1T cycle before, taking 10 or 20 mg, I couldnt do PCT, I was in lock up for over a week.

    However, I got home, didnt do PCT, and I had zero side effects. I love m1t.

    But back to my question...
  20. New Member
    Lukass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    96
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    28.2%

    Quote Originally Posted by UNCfan1 View Post
    He is at DA so I will ask him about it.
    Huh?
  21. Registered User
    UNCfan1's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,948
    Rep Power
    1066
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    87.68%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukass View Post
    Huh?
    He is at another site. He doesn't post here. Sorry DA is short for another site.
  22. Professional Member
    MentalTwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,516
    Rep Power
    2355
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    80.32%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukass View Post
    I got arrested 2 weeks into a M1T cycle before, taking 10 or 20 mg, I couldnt do post cycle therapy, I was in lock up for over a week.

    However, I got home, didnt do PCT, and I had zero side effects. I love m1t.

    But back to my question...
    wow, that kind of sucks...
    I think tomorrow just come here and bump it and there will be more people floatin around that will chime in.
  23. New Member
    Lukass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    96
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    28.2%

    Quote Originally Posted by UNCfan1 View Post
    He is at another site. He doesn't post here. Sorry DA is short for another site.
    Oh.
  24. New Member
    Lukass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    96
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    28.2%

    Quote Originally Posted by MentalTwitch View Post
    wow, that kind of sucks...
    I think tomorrow just come here and bump it and there will be more people floatin around that will chime in.
    Yea I only want them to answer my original question at the top of the page though.


    I have to go to bed, ill check this thread tomorrow. (Or tonight, because I drink tons of water and im always getting out of bed to take a leak).

    Thanks
  25. New Member
    Lukass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    96
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    28.2%

    Read..., Very Important.


    Quote Originally Posted by Lukass View Post
    5a-androstane = etioallocholane (Original early Superdrol)

    5b-androstane = etiocholane (M-Drol / Most new Superdrol clones)

    Etiocholane (in M-Drol) refers to the 5 beta isomer, not the 5 alpha(In AX Superdrol). 5 beta's are not known for their anabolic/androgenic properties...

    It’s my understanding that Superdrol’s compound is: 2a, 17a-di methyl-5a-androstane-3-one-17b-ol, and has the target hormone 5aa, which is much stronger than M-Drol (M-Drol targets 5b.)

    So I think M-Drol is something like this: (You can buy it in bulk in powder form).

    Etiocholan-3a-ol-17-one
    5b-Androsterone; Etiocholanone; 3a-Hydroxy-5b-androstan-17-one
    C19H30O2 F.W. 290.45 CAS: 53-42-9


    And original AX Superdrol is - 2a, 17a-di methyl-5a-androstane/androsterone-3-one-17b-ol,

    And again, CEL'S M-Drol is 5b,... So my question is, does this explain why Alot of people I know have had better results with the original Superdrol? (Including me).

    The reason I ask is because I bought a bottle of M-Drol, So for all you chemists, Is M-Drol really weaker? Or should my 5alpha and 5 beta research not even pose a big concern.

    Im thinking it is weaker, and CEL knows it, too. If I am wrong, ill be HAPPY, because I want my M-Drol to put at least 6 lbs on me... If it is much weaker I aint even gonna take it!
    I might have made some mistakes in the 5th section/mini paragraph. But it really does'nt matter.

    Because the simple qeustion is... Why is AX superdrol 5a, and M-Drol and other clones 5b? Im hearing 5a is better by a great deal, and if it is, That would mean that when you buy a SD clone, and it says something like "Same exact compound as Original AX SD(Anabolic Xtreme Superdrol)", then they would actually be fooling you. AX SD = focus on 5 alpha isomer.
    M-Drol = etiocholane = 5 beta which is not gonna build as much muscle... am I correct?..
  26. Registered User
    Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,016
    Rep Power
    714
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    28.11%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Interesting, thanks for bringing this up
  27. New Member
    antodrol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    32
    Posts
    28
    Rep Power
    104
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    93.77%

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukass View Post
    I might have made some mistakes in the 5th section/mini paragraph. But it really does'nt matter.

    Because the simple qeustion is... Why is AX superdrol 5a, and M-Drol and other clones 5b? Im hearing 5a is better by a great deal, and if it is, That would mean that when you buy a superdrol clone, and it says something like "Same exact compound as Original AX SD(Anabolic Xtreme Superdrol)", then they would actually be fooling you. AX SD = focus on 5 alpha isomer.
    M-Drol = etiocholane = 5 beta which is not gonna build as much muscle... am I correct?..
    Interesting...
    The feedbacks on m-drol, methyl drol (etiocholane....5beta) are good;same gains and same strength as original SD....
    I've serached and I found that oxodrol12 and methyl-vol are the same of the original SD (alfa isomer....5a-androstan)
    I've 2 cycle of oxodrol12 and I think it have a love dose of anadrol (possible???). I've gained lot of water weight on a ipocaloric/low chos diet...and I know SD is a dry AAS
    Next I'll try methyl-drol SNS. Beta isomer? Yes I think (2a-17a di methyl-5-etiocholane-3 one-17ol).
    Is the difference from the 2 isomers are like the pheraplex and ergo max lmg I think the beta isomer has more sides and is more androgenic...
  28. New Member
    Wilderbeast's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  219.0 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Age
    29
    Posts
    487
    Rep Power
    361
    Level
    21
    Lv. Percent
    51.97%

    I am not chemist either, but I do know that the alpha/beta isomer issues with pheraplex clones might be a similar issue with superdrol and its clones.

    In Pheraplex/clones: The alpha isomer is the more anabolic of the two isomers, therefore it should yield better overall muscle gains than the beta isomer.

    The beta isomer is the more androgenic of the two isomers. It will give you the more androgenic effect, yielding lesser muscle gain to some degree.

    If you remember I believe it was ErgomaxLMG that was a 70% / 30% (alpha/beta) isomer combination of the isomers in pheraplex. If I understand correctly, Pheraplex was therefore only the alpha isomers present in the compund ErgomaxLMG.

    The only problem with trying to break down the actual content of some clones is that some companies do not, or are not really willing to reveal the actual alpha:beta isomer ratio of their product.

    P-Plex from CEL, according to their COA, is 97% a / 3% b.
    I know that Neogenix Pheredrol is 100% a / 0% b.

    Superdrol clones, more than likely, follow a similar pattern in how their alpha/beta isomer ratio affects the overall activity and effect of the product.
  29. New Member
    Lukass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    96
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    28.2%

    Well, no offense to CompEdgeLabs, but at this point, I just wont take their word for it, if they were to tell me M-Drol (for example) is just as anabolic as AX SD.

    However I thank you for your feedback
    (Wilderbeast, antodrol, everyone else) and I do know methyl-drol SNS worked for me myself (which is beta isomer im guessing). So M-Drol is definitely worth a try.
  30. Board Moderator
    Never enough
    EasyEJL's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  205 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    46
    Posts
    31,842
    Rep Power
    768803
    Level
    95
    Lv. Percent
    23.13%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity RoyaltyActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukass View Post
    Well, no offense to CompEdgeLabs, but at this point, I just wont take their word for it, if they were to tell me M-Drol (for example) is just as anabolic as AX superdrol.

    However I thank you for your feedback
    (Wilderbeast, antodrol, everyone else) and I do know methyl-drol SNS worked for me myself (which is beta isomer im guessing). So M-Drol is definitely worth a try.
    Also, from a sheer mathematical viewpoint, you have to consider that the $19 for a bottle of mdrol vs $80 or so for original superdrol, even if original is slightly better for mass gain, is it 4x better?
    This space for rent

    Phenadrol Log http://anabolicminds.com/forum/suppl...-hell-did.html - AMAZING fat loss results so far
  31. New Member
    HolyPower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    50
    Rep Power
    112
    Level
    6
    Lv. Percent
    92.5%

    For it's nomanclature, Mdrol is 99.9% pure

    Here a Mdrol lab test:

    http://anabolicminds.com/photopost/s...o=1204&cat=500

    Take a look at it !
  32. Bananas
    TripDog's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  201 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    10,084
    Rep Power
    5551
    Level
    62
    Lv. Percent
    41.58%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    So then what does that make cel clones? a or b...?
    The LORD is my rock, my fortress, and my savior; my God is my rock, in whom I find protection. He is my shield, the power that saves me, and my place of safety.-Psalm 18:2
  33. Binging on Pure ****ing Rage
    Mulletsoldier's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,226
    Rep Power
    27064
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    41.01%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Beta isomers Trip.
  34. New Member
    Lukass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    96
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    28.2%

    Quote Originally Posted by HolyPower View Post
    For it's nomanclature, Mdrol is 99.9% pure

    Here a Mdrol lab test:

    http://anabolicminds.com/photopost/s...o=1204&cat=500

    Take a look at it !
    I know it is pure... Im just saying original AX SD = 5a and M-Drol is different it = 5b.

    5a > 5b. 5a is an isomer that would trigger more of an anabolic effect.
  35. Elite Member
    stxnas's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  195 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Age
    33
    Posts
    9,983
    Rep Power
    969168
    Level
    68
    Lv. Percent
    59.53%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Hmm, that one slid right past me...very interesting observation. Has anybody reading this ran the original and one of the new clones? I know people loved SNS's superdrol clone, and Methyl DX3 has a great following too...CEL obviously has a following or there wouldn't be so much attention being paid to M-Drol right now...

    I'm not doubting that there are still gains with the clones or the Beta versions, but I'm really wondering how the sides differ? With DMT (PP vs Ergo) the Beta seemed to have a more apparent sides for most. I wonder if the same goes here?
    RcB Since 09-06-2011 20:55 EST, Post 49
  36. New Member
    Wilderbeast's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  219.0 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Age
    29
    Posts
    487
    Rep Power
    361
    Level
    21
    Lv. Percent
    51.97%

    SNS was a very good clone of superdrol, actually you can't even call it a clone.

    The owner or AX told a vitamin store owner the truth was that the original AX superdrol and the SNS superdrol clone came from identical raw materials.

    So, as to agree with you, SNS superdrol was good yes.
  37. Board Moderator
    Never enough
    EasyEJL's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  205 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    46
    Posts
    31,842
    Rep Power
    768803
    Level
    95
    Lv. Percent
    23.13%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity RoyaltyActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Quote Originally Posted by Gixxer82 View Post
    in my case it would probably be 10x better.
    hehehehe true.
    This space for rent

    Phenadrol Log http://anabolicminds.com/forum/suppl...-hell-did.html - AMAZING fat loss results so far
  38. New Member
    Lukass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Age
    33
    Posts
    22
    Rep Power
    96
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    28.2%

    AX SD/Original early SD probly is anywhere from 1.5 - 15 times better if you asked me.
  39. Registered User
    kwyckemynd00's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"   lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Age
    31
    Posts
    5,324
    Rep Power
    2847
    Level
    52
    Lv. Percent
    88.64%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Wow, that slipped right by me. M-drol is the 5b-androstane stereoisomer of superdrol...call me a sucker, I've got an unopened bottle in my closet.

    You can't even call this a clone, its a different molecule by definition (isomers are DIFFERENT molecules with the same molecular formula).

    These differences might seem small to some of you, but they're huge for your biology becuase each and every molecule's function is dependent on its structure (shape) and when you take 5a-androstane and change it to 5b-androstane you've drastically altered the structure of the hormone.

    See the pictures below for a visual as to how the 5b and 5a isomers differ:



    The structure is drastically different at the A ring of the hormone.

    But, I guess if it still works, $19.99 is a good deal regardless--even if it is a different hormone than the original SD.
  40. Advanced Member
    Botch's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"   lbs.
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Age
    28
    Posts
    760
    Rep Power
    469
    Level
    21
    Lv. Percent
    57.84%

    I wonder why companies started producing the beta version instead of cloning the alpha...is it easier to make a beta clone or something?
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 26
    Last Post: 05-26-2010, 02:29 PM
  2. combo or muscle building program
    By WannaGro in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-05-2005, 12:52 PM
  3. Just signed up for the muscle building program
    By firebird in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-15-2005, 06:45 PM
  4. IGF-1, insulin and muscle building ?
    By chi_town in forum Weight Loss
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-22-2003, 03:32 PM
  5. Keto Muscle Building
    By Carl Willingham in forum Weight Loss
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-26-2003, 05:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in