Epistane/Havoc vs Furazadrol vs 1-4ad Bold (all new orals)

  1. Registered User
    ECTOmorph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    378
    Answers
    0

    Epistane/Havoc vs Furazadrol vs 1-4ad Bold (all new orals)


    These are some of the newer ProHormones on the market and I've spent the lat 24 hours reading up on em.

    Furzadrol is close to Winny

    1-4ad Bold is basically Equipoise

    Epistane/Havoc is basically ?

    Which of these are more anabolic? Im thinking Bold

    Seems like Furazadrol would be best on a cut, Bold on a bulk (slightly wet?), and Epi seems to be either or (with less results)

    Any discussion on this??????

  2. Registered User
    adil's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    237
    Answers
    0


    boldenone is half as androgenic as test, so it should cause half as much bloat/acne etc.. as test. The only side commonly reported with epi is hair loss (mimics DHT IIRC).

    epi/havoc could be used on either a bulk or cut, producing lean gains.

    Boldenone is usually used on a bulk as it is a potent appetite increaser, as you guessed gains will be neither 'dry' nor 'wet'

    Furz could be utilised as part of a stack due to it being a non-methyl, it is however bad on lipid levels. It is 'dry' but could be added to a 'wet' compound to further increase the strength gains of the cycle
  3. Oldtimer
    Board Sponsor
    bigschmidt821's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,177
    Answers
    0


    epistane has an androgenic anabolic rating of 91% and 1100% making it byfar one of the most anabolic substances i have seen yet...what is on paper doesnt always carry over to real life
    •   
       

  4. Registered User
    T-Bone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    15,557
    Answers
    0


    1,4 has been around for years and years, its not at all new.
  5. board observer
    Moyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Age
    31
    Posts
    880
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by ECTOmorph View Post
    These are some of the newer ProHormones on the market and I've spent the lat 24 hours reading up on em.

    Furzadrol is close to Winny

    1-4ad Bold is basically Equipoise

    Epistane/Havoc is basically ?

    Which of these are more anabolic? Im thinking Bold

    Seems like Furazadrol would be best on a cut, Bold on a bulk (slightly wet?), and Epi seems to be either or (with less results)

    Any discussion on this??????
    Epistane/Havoc is by far the strongest, which I think is what you're asking. 1,4 AD Bold is dry from the reports I've read.
  6. Registered User
    ECTOmorph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    378
    Answers
    0


    None of these are methl's right? So how toxic are they?
  7. Registered User
    UNCfan1's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,949
    Answers
    0


    Furzadrol is the PH to Miotolan(Furazabol) claims on this steroid is that its 2x stronger than Winny. Also Furzadrol is the unmethylated version of Miotolan(Furazabol). Also supposed to be good on lipids.

    Epi/Havoc are methyl, toxicity is pretty low from user feeback and labs that this Dr. I know has seen.
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 03-23-2011, 10:28 AM
  2. Better gains: Superdrol vs Epistane(Havoc)?
    By Eightpak in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 164
    Last Post: 11-28-2010, 10:49 AM
  3. Furazadrol Vs Bold
    By T H E O R E M in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-06-2008, 02:40 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-18-2008, 09:03 AM
  5. Propradrol vs. Furazadrol vs. Revolt
    By nclifterz71 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 09-15-2007, 04:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in