Masterdrol/IF Bold help???

LiftNDestroy

LiftNDestroy

Member
So after doing tons of reading and countless hours of research on these forums I've decided to sign up and post. Pardon me if this is in the wrong area of the forums(someone point me in the right direction). I am on day one of the MM clone at 20mg a day but after hearing of all of the possible nasty side effects of superdrol, and MM, I've decided that it's not really all that worth it for me to continue use of the product. I have access to a SERM if needed but weighing everything out, it just seems like a bad idea. I'm assuming at only one day at 20mg I should be ok considering I'm discontinuing use of the product all together. My question is this, would it be a bad idea to start up on Iforce - Bold in place of the MM clone or just lay off untill I decide to get serious about cycle and post cycle therapy? I'm 28, my diet stays clean pretty much all the time, and I take a solid liver support, multi, fish oil, etc... I just wanted some solid strength gains from this and was thinking I might get them with less sides from the bold since it's a non methylated product. Sorry for the rant on my first post but any suggestions here? :think:
 
matthew76 said:
have you tried epidrol, yet?

superdrol IS harsh as hell - it's not worth it to me either

oh, and WELCOME!
Click to expand...

I have not but heard alot about it. I assume the sides are low? I don't mind the agression, I just don't want any long term sides.
Did some research, and looks like this is similar to havoc, hemaguno, and the like. A friend of mine gave me a partial bottle of Hemaguno, so I ran that for 3 weeks and it was quite awesome, low sides, I cycled everything right didn't feel my test shutdown or anything. Might give the Epidrol a run. Holding off on the bold, though I have run that in the past with great success as well.
 
LiftNDestroy said:
just lay off untill I decide to get serious about cycle and post cycle therapy?
Click to expand...

Yes, that is what you should do! Doesn't really mather if the substance is a methyl. After a cycle you still DO need a good post cycle therapy. An alternative could be pulsing, do some searching and you might find it interesting. You might even find use for yor superdrol-clone without the bad sides!

Z
 
MrZ said:
Yes, that is what you should do! Doesn't really mather if the substance is a methyl. After a cycle you still DO need a good post cycle therapy. An alternative could be pulsing, do some searching and you might find it interesting. You might even find use for yor superdrol-clone without the bad sides!

Z
Click to expand...
I briefly read through that pulsing thread, I'll read it through more thoroughly when I have the time, but the idea sounds awesome! I don't plan to trash the superdrol, but I think I started taking it prematurely as of now so I'll save it for later. Thanks for the help guys!
:squat:
 
superdrol has a rather bad rep, taking responsibly and with the right supporting supps u should be fine with it. make sure to have everything in place before starting tho
 
bigschmidt821 said:
superdrol has a rather bad rep, taking responsibly and with the right supporting supps u should be fine with it. make sure to have everything in place before starting tho
Click to expand...
:goodpost:

I have yet to see anyone post any liver enzymes that show that superdrol is harsh on the liver. I have seen some moderate alterations in lipid profiles but that is to be expected with most AAS and it is a short term effect.
 
jonny21 said:
:goodpost:

I have yet to see anyone post any liver enzymes that show that superdrol is harsh on the liver. I have seen some moderate alterations in lipid profiles but that is to be expected with most anabolic steroids and it is a short term effect.
Click to expand...

agreed, some complications may be caused using some of the clones of superdrol which wont focus on purity as much. this is why i stick by designer supps, AX, or there is now a british company which Dr. D helped in formulating their superdrol compound, it is the same as with M1t, bad reps often from irresponsible users but also bodies react differently so it remains to be seen.
 
once again johnny i would rep you if it let me. we need our own little area on this board with dr.d cuz he feels the same way bout superdrol i had a convo with him two weeks ago on it
 
bigschmidt821 said:
once again johnny i would rep you if it let me. we need our own little area on this board with dr.d cuz he feels the same way bout superdrol i had a convo with him two weeks ago on it
Click to expand...

What do you think is a quality superdrol clone, since AX doesn't not promote it anymore? CEL?
 
CEL seems solid. i spent some time with dr d a few days ago discussing the best clone. Genetic Edge is who he recomends PM me if you would like a link love to help ya out
 
Like any compund out there SD is going to treat everyone differently. It IS less toxic than the gold standard of nastiness..M1T..but for me, the mental sides were overwhelming to the point of being dangerous and therefore not worth it...and no, I'm not alone.

Others have great experiences with it. Your mileage may vary but at least be informed.
 
A good, relatively mild, low toxicity stack for a beginner would be iForce Bold @ 400 mg ED and Epistane @ 30mg ED.

Neither are particularly liver toxic.

Mixing a wet compound like Bold with a dry compound like Stane usually provides excellent anabolic effects.

The anti-e aspects of the stane will make PCT easier also.
 
bold is rather a dry, it converts into boldenene which is a rather dry cutter of a compound. now add methylation to that bold molecule and u get dbol, which is a wet copmound which is what i think u may be thinking of when u refer to bold as a wet compound
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top