I'm Actually Thinking About It - Synthol in my Calves
- 05-16-2007, 08:30 AM
I'm Actually Thinking About It - Synthol in my Calves
Yes. They don't grow. High rep low rep heavy weight light weight 10 second rest 10 sets 100 reps... I figured I would do it on my Test/Tren/Anadrol cycle. Most anabolic during muscle fascia stretching... It's going to require 6 shots per muscle, 3 per each head. Would you do it? Or just settle for 15.5 in calves and 17 in arms?
- 05-16-2007, 09:07 AM
05-16-2007, 09:24 AM
05-16-2007, 09:42 AM
05-16-2007, 09:46 AM
05-16-2007, 10:15 AM
Synthol, if used correctly can actually look very natural. People are often thrown off by the pictures of guys that go way over board like Valentino.
But I'm sure it is more widely used for just this effect. If you were to use it. Start very very low and try to add like a 1/4 inch or less to gauge.
I'm not advocating the use though. Shooting an oil like that into a muscle to stretch the fascia and not grow muscle seems like an injury waiting to happen. I think IGF-1 would be a better method to try first.
Intereting none the less.
05-16-2007, 10:32 AM
[QUOTE=PumpingIron;822816]Synthol, if used correctly can actually look very natural. People are often thrown off by the pictures of guys that go way over board like Valentino.
Agreed man, from what I understand a lot of Pro's and national competitors use synthol in moderation (I'm not justifying the use of it) but most people can't tell they even use it .
05-16-2007, 10:49 AM
05-16-2007, 11:54 AM
the scar tissue in the calves is not fun. i used to do most of my shots in the calves, including prop. they will get very tight and it will be very hard to work legs sometimes. i really can't recomend it.
try different frequencies and loading schemes. maybe plyometrics. you can do complex training of plyos and calf raises. this will teach you to fire the fibers better.
05-16-2007, 12:02 PM
05-16-2007, 12:37 PM
05-17-2007, 04:09 AM
05-17-2007, 09:03 AM
UMM why are you thinking sythol aren't you making your own tren? just make you tren at a lower strength. example instead of 100mg/ml bring it down to 50mg/ml then use 50mg in each calf
05-17-2007, 03:00 PM
05-18-2007, 11:19 AM
oh ok. yeah it would be alot easier if you were making your own tren or prop. i know a few people who have gone the low strength route over the straight synthol route and it worked quite well. I know alot of people say spot injecting is a myth but if duchainne and romano two of the most knowledgable people on AS believe in it I do two
05-18-2007, 12:18 PM
mixed up...at the lower concetration you would be injecting double the amount of oil. do you think there would be some correlation there?
05-18-2007, 12:22 PM
05-18-2007, 12:26 PM
Hey GotRipped, I just posted this thread yesterday. Check out the article. ABC News Report - Buying Massive Muscles: Risky Injections Lure Body Builders
RcB Since 09-06-2011 20:55 EST, Post 49
05-18-2007, 12:49 PM
05-18-2007, 02:14 PM
Calve size is almost all genetic. If you're born with naturally smaller calves (like me and many others) its EXTREMELY hard to make em grow no matter how you train. I've been told Arnold was one of the select few that had naturally small calves but was able to get them huge by lifting.
Unless bodybuilding is your career, I say f-ck using synthol. I'd much rather have slightly lagging calves than take a chance with that stuff. Besides, no girl is gonna give a sh-t about your calves when the rest of your muscles are bulging from the test/tren/a-bombs.
05-18-2007, 04:29 PM
Site injecting lower mg/ml AAS along w/ MGF/IGF, and more frequent calve training bro.
I'm not one of those guys that gets all emotional and outraged by the idea of synthol, cuz I know that the messed up looking lumpy muscles are only seen in guys pumping liters and liters and liters into themselves and probably spending 100's and 100's of dollars to do it.
But still it would probably be hard to apply the synthol in a way that didnt mishape it a little. Bi's and tri's and delts are simple and and seem like theyd be easy to "touch up", but w/ calves........ man u'd be better off getting calf implants IMO. U could trust that a controlled procedure like that would produce a natural look and would be pretty safe cuz they do it all the time.
05-18-2007, 04:45 PM
My calves are good part of my genetics. The bad thing is since starting a new cardio program they have been aching like hell and I can barely walk. I am gonna keep the cardio program though because its more important to me than keeping my size in my calves. They will recover eventually. I have a stronger lower body and a weaker upper body. You take the good and the bad, just work with what you have.
05-18-2007, 10:48 PM
Your body is going to decay. Look at Arnold, look at Frank, etc. Look at your grandparents. There's more to life than your apperance - mainly your health. Your also susceptible to being in an accident and losing the image you spend so much time working hard at.
It's up to you. It's just not smart.
A better way is to get a friend to stand on top of a calf raise machine while you bust out 500 pound reps. So goes strength, so goes size. What you need is determination, not surgery.
Plus its fun doing it - they'll grow, just blast them to hell. You just need to shoot for a goal of weight. try working up to 300 pound sitting calf raises.
(remember when you walk your already putting ~200 pounds of stress on them. You need to step it up)
05-18-2007, 11:12 PM
05-19-2007, 01:56 PM
I think this thread sorta highlights the fun of lifting anyway. We're all susceptible to losing our gains through faults that aren't our own (accidents, sickness, etc.)
It's just fun as hell to lift.
Similar Forum Threads
- By one2nv in forum AnabolicsReplies: 4Last Post: 07-22-2010, 02:42 AM
- By j0sh710 in forum SupplementsReplies: 20Last Post: 02-08-2008, 10:20 PM
- By sebambam in forum IGF-1/GHReplies: 3Last Post: 07-26-2006, 11:28 AM
- By LakeMountD in forum Post Cycle TherapyReplies: 9Last Post: 03-08-2006, 06:43 PM
- By ventos in forum SupplementsReplies: 1Last Post: 11-14-2005, 08:22 AM