Converting Prohormones into Actives: Can it be done?

  1. Converting Prohormones into Actives: Can it be done?

    WARNING: This Post Contains Science Nerd Chemistry.

    Here is a diagram of how test, est, dht, and andro convert.

    Formestane (prohormone of 4-OHT)

    4-OHT acetate (Pretend Ac is just an H, and it'll be 4-OHT)

    Now then, you will notice that the only difference between andro & test (or form & 4-OHT) is that the #17 carbonyl group is replaced by a hydroxyl group, thus activating the prohormone.
    Converting a carbonyl group to hydroxyl is as easy as pie: Add a metalhydride (NaBH4 or LiAlH4) and water. Unfortunately, testosterone is not that easy.

    Problem You'll notice that the lower left (A) ring has a carbonyl group in both cases, and this reaction is not selective on which oxo group it attacks.

    In closing, I think harnessing the potential to convert prohormones to real hormones would be........awesome. If anything it should make for an interesting chemistry discussion, and who knows, maybe we'll learn something.


  2. It can be done. There is an older thread on very subject matter that a search should be capable of finding.

  3. Quote Originally Posted by Klaus View Post
    It is quite a bit more involved than what you have put forward. Converting a carbonyl (in this case a ketone) to a hydroxyl group is a reductive process. Simply adding acid in ether will do no such thing. Also, the lower left ring is called the 'A ring' in steriod chemistry. Reducing the A ring's ketone to a hydroxyl will not produce an estrogen. For a steroid to be classified as an estrogen, the A ring must be aromatic.

    It's good that you've taken interest into the chemistry of steroids--keep studying and reading on the subject.
    My bad on the ether reaction, I was going off memory and got mixed up with a grignard reaction. Whoops, wrong mechanism. I looked up the correct one, and edited my post.

    Thanks for clarifying the makings of an estrogen, at the time of the posting, I wasn't sure if making the oxo group on the A ring would create estradiol or not (I wasn't paying attention to aromacity). My O-chem book doesn't spend as many pages on steroid chemistry as I would have liked (only 3 pages).

  4. Quote Originally Posted by Klaus View Post
    NaBH4 is not particularly effective as a reducing agent in water. There have been a number of cases in literature where the researchers noted that performing NaBH4 reduction in methanol is much more favorable. Ethanol is not as good as methanol, but it is still better than water. Additionally, adding a small amount of aqueous hydroxide ions slows the rate of borohydride decomposition. Since most steroids are water insoluble, the solvent of choice for reductive reactions is typically methanol.

    LiAlH4 should never be dissolved in water unless one desires to form lithium hydroxide and aluminum hydroxide in an exotic fashion. Hydrogen gas will rapidly evolve with the danger of ignition. LiAlH4 reductions are most commonly carried out in a dry ether-type solvent such as diethyl ether or THF under an inert atmosphere.

    Yeah, I recall my professor saying LiAlH4 is some pretty dangerous stuff. I'm just going of the mechanisms given in Brown Foote & Iverson 4th edition Organic Chemistry.

    So for NaBH4, use methanol with a little bit of lye (to retard degradation). The older thread on this topic looked more at the what, but I'm more interested in the 'how'.

  5. Quote Originally Posted by Klaus View Post
    Unfortunately, the molecule presented to be reduced has two ketones. The distinguishing factors, however are steric hinderance and the conjugated double bond next to the 3-one. Due to steric hinderance, the 3-one will normally react faster than the 17-one; however, since the 3-one is conjugated, it is more stable, and thus becomes less reactive. Unfortunately though, enones are suseptible to 1,4 reduction when NaBH4 is the reducing reagent. In fact, from various literature sources I've read, 1,4 reduction seems to be a preferrential route when using NaBH4. To avoid such side reaction problems, drastically lowering the temperature of the reaction mixture will provide the selectivity that we would want. Dry ice in acetone will provide -78 C which will cause the reaction to preferrentially reduce the 17-one to 17b-hydroxy. Of course, one would have to monitor this reaction via TLC to know when to stop the reaction.

    -78 C seems to be the preferred temperature for many organic reactions. Thanks for all your help.

    What do you do for a living klaus? You seem to have a very strong understanding in organic sythesis.


Similar Forum Threads

  1. Bridging PH's--Can/Should it be done?
    By hawkfan9 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-07-2014, 09:01 PM
  2. Switching Esters - Can it be done?
    By Number 10 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 12-21-2013, 05:43 AM
  3. 45 lbs to gain in 18 months - can it be done?
    By Minaker in forum Natural Bodybuilding
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-01-2013, 10:58 AM
  4. build muscle and lose fat!! can it be done?!
    By workout18 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 10-12-2009, 06:16 AM
  5. does cla a work and can it be taken on the ckd diet
    By bigrich954rr in forum Weight Loss
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-19-2004, 10:03 AM
Log in
Log in