D
dmix
New member
- Awards
- 0
Whenever people think back to their first cycle, a common answer is, "I wish I'd have waited a few years."
My question is - why?
I understand the basic, inarguable, definitive physical responses - bad post cycle therapy, too big a stack, hadn't finished growing, gyne/side effect/relationship issues, those sorts of things.
But if you are done growing, and NOT at genetic potential - but run a conservative cycle with proper post cycle therapy and made good gains, even if you didn't have the same knowledge and level of intensity you later gained - what makes you say, you wish you'd waited?
From what I understand, the test levels return to pre-cycle levels with proper post cycle therapy, and provided you have your diet and workout in order, and have a firm basis to run a cycle, there seems to be little in the way of the "wait until your genetic potential" mythos. Am I way off base here?
My question is - why?
I understand the basic, inarguable, definitive physical responses - bad post cycle therapy, too big a stack, hadn't finished growing, gyne/side effect/relationship issues, those sorts of things.
But if you are done growing, and NOT at genetic potential - but run a conservative cycle with proper post cycle therapy and made good gains, even if you didn't have the same knowledge and level of intensity you later gained - what makes you say, you wish you'd waited?
From what I understand, the test levels return to pre-cycle levels with proper post cycle therapy, and provided you have your diet and workout in order, and have a firm basis to run a cycle, there seems to be little in the way of the "wait until your genetic potential" mythos. Am I way off base here?