+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 34

What is this chemical exactly?

  1.  11-20-2006  12:23 AM
    Registered User MGH1982's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Stats
    5'11"  217 lbs.
    Location
    Ohio
    Age
    31
    Posts
    176
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    181

    What is this chemical exactly?


    2a,3a-epithio-17a-methyl-5a-androstan-17b-ol

    It's from a new supplement coming out by RPN. it looks like sperdrol but modified... if it has anywhere near the toxicity of SD i am gonna count that out.



  2.  11-20-2006  01:38 AM
    Gold Member xxtruxx1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    999
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    594

    Superdrol is only heavily toxic when run with poor cycle support ancillaries & in overly high doses.

    •   


        
       

  3.  11-20-2006  08:40 AM
    Registered User t-bone2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    414
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    303

    Originally Posted by xxtruxx1
    Superdrol is only heavily toxic when run with poor cycle support ancillaries & in overly high doses.
    There are a lot of logs around where people's lipid profiles have been trashed when running superdrol at the manufacturer's recommended protocol even with a well thought out post cycle therapy plan. Not that the profile won't recover with a solid post cycle therapy, but if you already have a marginal profile to begin with I wouldn't categorically say "no worries" to the toxicity aspect of that supplement.

  4.  11-20-2006  09:29 AM
    Binging on Pure ****ing Rage Mulletsoldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Stats
    5'10"  215 lbs.
    Posts
    12,234
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    27051

    Originally Posted by t-bone2
    There are a lot of logs around where people's lipid profiles have been trashed when running superdrol at the manufacturer's recommended protocol even with a well thought out post cycle therapy plan. Not that the profile won't recover with a solid post cycle therapy, but if you already have a marginal profile to begin with I wouldn't categorically say "no worries" to the toxicity aspect of that supplement.
    Some also ran it with almost untouched values for both liver enzymes and lipids

  5.  11-20-2006  09:42 AM
    Board Supporter xtraflossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    on your screen
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,930
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1799

    Originally Posted by MGH1982
    2a,3a-epithio-17a-methyl-5a-androstan-17b-ol

    It's from a new supplement coming out by RPN. it looks like sperdrol but modified... if it has anywhere near the toxicity of superdrol i am gonna count that out.
    My guess goes to..........

    Epitiostanol
    (2á, 3á-epithio-5á-androstan-17 â -ol)
    * AS LISTED above, it is on the ban list.
    Syntrax

    *** CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION ***

    RTECS NUMBER : KC1035000
    CHEMICAL NAME : 2-alpha,3-alpha-Epithio-5-alpha-androstan-17-beta-olCAS REGISTRY NUMBER : 2363-58-8
    LAST UPDATED : 199706
    DATA ITEMS CITED : 18
    MOLECULAR FORMULA : C19-H30-O-S
    MOLECULAR WEIGHT : 306.55
    COMPOUND DESCRIPTOR : Reproductive Effector
    SYNONYMS/TRADE NAMES :
    * 2,3-Epithioandrostan-17-ol
    * Epitiostanol
    * 10275-S
    * Thiodrol

    *** HEALTH HAZARD DATA ***

    ** ACUTE TOXICITY DATA **

    TYPE OF TEST : LD - Lethal dose
    ROUTE OF EXPOSURE : Oral
    SPECIES OBSERVED : Rodent - rat
    DOSE/DURATION : >6 gm/kg
    TOXIC EFFECTS :
    Behavioral - somnolence (general depressed activity)
    Liver - other changes
    REFERENCE :
    OYYAA2 Oyo Yakuri. Pharmacometrics. (Oyo Yakuri Kenkyukai, CPO Box 180,
    Sendai 980-91, Japan) V.1- 1967- Volume(issue)/page/year: 7,805,1973

    TYPE OF TEST : LDLo - Lowest published lethal dose
    ROUTE OF EXPOSURE : Intraperitoneal
    SPECIES OBSERVED : Rodent - rat
    DOSE/DURATION : 5 gm/kg
    TOXIC EFFECTS :
    Details of toxic effects not reported other than lethal dose value
    REFERENCE :
    OYYAA2 Oyo Yakuri. Pharmacometrics. (Oyo Yakuri Kenkyukai, CPO Box 180,
    Sendai 980-91, Japan) V.1- 1967- Volume(issue)/page/year: 7,805,1973




    .................
    http://hazard.com/msds/tox/f/q51/q879.html
    Last edited by xtraflossy; 11-20-2006 at 10:22 AM.

  6.  11-20-2006  01:51 PM
    Doctor Science LakeMountD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    4,253
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    2539

    It is a structure similar to methyl DHT, the toxicity is MUCH MUCH lower than Superdrol however. In fact cholesterol only jumped 9 points and HDL only dropped 6, which is huge for a high dosage 4 week cycle. It is actually the methylated version of epitiostanol

  7.  11-20-2006  02:08 PM
    Banned same_old's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,527
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    0

    Originally Posted by LakeMountD
    It is a structure similar to methyl DHT, the toxicity is MUCH MUCH lower than Superdrol however. In fact cholesterol only jumped 9 points and HDL only dropped 6, which is huge for a high dosage 4 week cycle. It is actually the methylated version of epitiostanol
    indeed - add a methyl group at 17a and suddenly it's legal

    EDIT: Saying who sells it is the same as source posting.

  8.  11-20-2006  02:10 PM
    PES Rep Rodja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Stats
    5'10"  220 lbs.
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    28
    Posts
    21,016
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    563905

    So would this be more for strength, size, or cutting? I know that methylization changes the actual hormone, but is there any info on the appropriate usage for this?

  9.  11-20-2006  02:10 PM
    Doctor Science LakeMountD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    4,253
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    2539

    [QUOTE=same_old]
    ....[QUOTE]

    And that is supposed to mean?

  10.  11-20-2006  02:14 PM
    Banned Rx Lift's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    258
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    0

    Can you guys provide us with a single study or a reference regarding the anabolic activity of the methylated form of Epitiostanol?

  11.  11-20-2006  02:18 PM
    Doctor Science LakeMountD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    4,253
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    2539

    Originally Posted by Rx Lift
    Can you guys provide us with a single study or a reference regarding the anabolic activity of the methylated form of Epitiostanol?
    Can't provide a study directly (although I have some coming, since some were in Japanese).

    Anabolic Profile compared to methyl test: 1100% more anabolic
    Androgenicity: 90% as androgenic

    In rats of course.

  12.  11-20-2006  02:22 PM
    Board Supporter xtraflossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    on your screen
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,930
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1799

    Here's a little morte information I have. I posted some in another thread also, I will try and move it here:
    2a,3a-epithio-17a-methyl-5a-androstan-17b-ol

    Methyl Version of
    Epitiostanol
    (2á, 3á-epithio-5á-androstan-17 â -ol)
    * AS LISTED above, it is on the ban list.

    -Excert:BK-
    *It is a sulfur containing steroidal androgen.
    *It is a 3b-2b thio derivative of methyl DHT. T
    he numbers look really good on paper and in rats (about 1100% as anabolic as test and 70% as androgenic).
    *It is probably very good for dry, hard, stength gains and not for "wet" gains.
    *It also seems to work as a steroidal AI.

    This product I believe was commerically made in Japan under the names Protabol and Hemoguno -

    LMD (I don't know if he cycled it personally, or the company he works for) posted some bloodwork after a 4 week run.
    havoc
    (Borrowed from YeahRight)
    From what I can tell, you won't be able to get your hands on it for a little bitt. I DO know that is goes pre-sale tonight, in case you like to be on the cutting edge

    Link to a current log (now about 5 days in)
    Testing Havoc Out! - Mind and Muscle Forums
    Last edited by xtraflossy; 11-20-2006 at 02:46 PM.

  13.  11-20-2006  02:24 PM
    Registered User RedwolfWV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Stats
    5'10"  185 lbs.
    Location
    West "By God" Virginia
    Age
    49
    Posts
    3,255
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1968

    It'll be interesting when the logs start showing up here.

  14.  11-20-2006  02:24 PM
    Registered User jmh80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Location
    Beaumont, TX
    Age
    33
    Posts
    8,119
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    9649

    For those that don't know - Floss just posted stuff from Kellner (Mr. Halodrol).

  15.  11-20-2006  02:36 PM
    Banned same_old's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,527
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    0

    edited by same_old:

    LMD - if you would just include SOME degree of scope in your conclusions - ie. "for the one sponsored person that has used it and had bloodwork, cholesterol was not severely impacted. this person was using XXX and YYY as well to mitigate these risks, and bloodwork was taken ZZ days after cycle completion, etc etc..." this accomplishes the desired effect but doesnt piss off objectivist people like me also include any other trials, good or bad, if there are any.

  16.  11-20-2006  02:42 PM
    Registered User jmh80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Location
    Beaumont, TX
    Age
    33
    Posts
    8,119
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    9649

    Same,
    Come on man. Give us some credit. Ain't no need for attacks.

  17.  11-20-2006  02:58 PM
    Banned same_old's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,527
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    0

    Originally Posted by jmh80
    Same,
    Come on man. Give us some credit. Ain't no need for attacks.
    ok fine. i edited my post. i'll kill 'em with consideration instead

  18.  11-20-2006  03:00 PM
    Doctor Science LakeMountD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    4,253
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    2539

    Originally Posted by same_old
    edited by same_old:

    LMD - if you would just include SOME degree of scope in your conclusions - ie. "for the one sponsored person that has used it and had bloodwork, cholesterol was not severely impacted. this person was using XXX and YYY as well to mitigate these risks, and bloodwork was taken ZZ days after cycle completion, etc etc..." this accomplishes the desired effect but doesnt piss off objectivist people like me also include any other trials, good or bad, if there are any.
    What in God's name are you talking about bro? I am so confused? There are only so many people who have taken it considering not ONE company has actually shipped a bottle yet. I gave you blood work from someone who ran it next to me. I didn't get blood work because I used mine after a cycle of something else and didn't want that to interfere with the blood work results. I could have gotten the blood work and made it show up as amazing and lied but I am not like that.

    As for you saying you respected my knowledge before, it hasn't changed. I was pimping LR3 IGF-1 long before ever started working for IBE.

  19.  11-20-2006  03:06 PM
    Board Supporter xtraflossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    on your screen
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,930
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1799

    Originally Posted by LakeMountD
    What in God's name are you talking about bro? I am so confused? There are only so many people who have taken it considering not ONE company has actually shipped a bottle yet. I gave you blood work from someone who ran it next to me. I didn't get blood work because I used mine after a cycle of something else and didn't want that to interfere with the blood work results. I could have gotten the blood work and made it show up as amazing and lied but I am not like that.

    As for you saying you respected my knowledge before, it hasn't changed. I was pimping LR3 IGF-1 long before ever started working for IBE.
    This is True!! - I remember many conversations fueled simply by the interest

    - Lake, .. This is supposed to activate the ER, what are the effects of this as far as GH, IGF levels??
    I'm not sure wether GH/IGF would decline due to the lack of estrogen, or increase.
    In either case, would running some Estra-4, 9-diene-3, 17-dione along with this make up for any decline in these levels, or, if the methyl Epitiostanol increased these levels, do you think it would just be overkill?....

  20.  11-20-2006  03:06 PM
    I am faster than 80% of all snakes Dwight Schrute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Stats
    6'1"  221 lbs.
    Location
    Southwest Florida
    Age
    40
    Posts
    12,930
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    7011

    Gentlemen,

    I am going to state this once again so that people will understand and hopefully people will remember this because its inevitable that people won't.

    Please keep the discussion to the compound ONLY. Do not bring into the equation of who sells it, where to get it, etc....

    There is not a sponsor on AM that does sell this and we are no way affiliated with those entities, no matter how creative they are, that sell this material.

    Remember, keep it to the COMPOUND ONLY.

    Thank you.
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/image...et/twitter.png http://anabolicminds.com/forum/image...t/facebook.png

    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Forum Threads

  1. chemical name?
    By Buffgammaman in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-15-2011, 11:01 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-25-2007, 04:07 PM
  3. chemical properties
    By thesinner in forum General Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-20-2007, 04:46 PM
  4. Last chemical or not?
    By hameronkid in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-28-2006, 10:57 PM
  5. Chemical name of Turinabol
    By Nate Dawg in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-17-2005, 06:32 PM

Tags for this Thread