Exploring:New anabolic: MAX LMG --> Propadrol - AnabolicMinds.com

Exploring:New anabolic: MAX LMG --> Propadrol

Page 1 of 2 12 Last
  1. Board Supporter
    xtraflossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,930
    Rep Power
    12328

    Reputation

    Exploring:New anabolic: MAX LMG --> Propadrol


    I found this while looking for information on that propadrol chem that looks like LMG, but claims that it is not..

    Gona-4,9(10)-dienes and process of producing the same
    Document Type and Number: United States Patent 4167517
    Link to this Page: Gona-4,9(10)-dienes and process of producing the same - Patent 4167517

    Abstract: New gona-4,9(10)-dienes of formula I ##STR1## where R is alkyl of 1 to 3 carbon atoms and X is Cl, Br, F, N.sub.3, SCN, CN, OH, OR'(R'=alkyl), NH.sub.2, a substituted amino group or a heterocyclic compound including nitrogen in the ring.
    The compounds have valuable biological properties, especially hormonal and antihormonal effects, and can be used to advantage in pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of endocrinopathies and for reproduction control in human beings and livestock.

    The invention also embraces a process for making the compounds by converting
    3-methyoxy-13.beta.-R-gona-2,5(10)-diene-17.beta.-spiro-1',2'-o xiranes.

    first to 17beta-hydroxy-17alpha.-CH.sub.2 X-13. beta.-R-gon-5(10)-en-3-one,

    then to the:

    17.beta.-hydroxy-17.alpha.-CH.sub.2 X-13.beta.-R-gona-4,9(10)-diene-3-ones of formula I.


    Max LMG is 13-ethyl-3-methoxy-gona-2,5(10)-diene-17-one
    Propadrol is 12-ethyl-3-methoxy-gona-diene
    Im not a chemist, but it looks like (either in nomenclature or design) for LMG they added an Ethyl??? - hell,.. maybe swapped the placement of the methoxy too.


    maybe someone can chime in on IF this above artical has anything to do with anything...
    I think where I am tring to go with this is:
    Propadrol is to Max LMG what Pheraplex is to Ergomax

    That propadrol could be a metabolite (altered or not) of Max LMG ~ the one responsable for the majority of the anabolic activity

    Propadrol Supplement Facts
    Serving Size: 1 Caps
    Servings per container: 40
    Amount Per Serving
    6-17 dihydroxyetiocholone-3-ol proponate
    12-ethyl-3-methoxy-gona-diene 15mg
    Last edited by xtraflossy; 11-08-2006 at 02:54 PM.

  2. New Member
    kingofthechiba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    104
    Rep Power
    159

    Reputation

    i did a max lmg cycle a while back and wasnt impressed at all. hopefully it has higher mg/serving. isnt xmass beefed up max lmg?
  3. New Member
    Kris4153's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    315
    Rep Power
    273

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by kingofthechiba
    i did a max lmg cycle a while back and wasnt impressed at all. hopefully it has higher mg/serving. isnt xmass beefed up max lmg?
    Yes its 45 mg vs 25 mg. Why didnt you like the cycle? What did your cycle look like? I'm probably going to do a ergomax and xmass cycle in january...
    •   
       

  4. New Member
    kingofthechiba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    104
    Rep Power
    159

    Reputation

    cant remember off hand what i was running but they werent puss doses. i just didnt see the gains i was expecting. do the ergomax its def. better than the max lmg version. havent done ergo but theres plenty of ppl here that have and got nice results. sry if this off topic of the thread btw!
  5. Board Supporter
    xtraflossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,930
    Rep Power
    12328

    Reputation

    Right,.. just for the record:
    * X-MASS is the same thing as MAX LMG, just different doses.
    * Ergomax was so much fun! I wish I could get my hands on some damnit!
    * Propadrol IS NOT another clone of XMASS or LMG.
    IT's a different (apparently anyways) compound.


    Hence, the posting and questions...
  6. Elite Member
    yeahright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,368
    Rep Power
    10344

    Reputation

    Bump for an answer.
  7. Banned
    pistonpump's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  225 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Age
    30
    Posts
    12,105
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    it would appear so.
  8. Board Supporter
    xtraflossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,930
    Rep Power
    12328

    Reputation

    maybe someone can chime in on IF this above artical has anything to do with anything...
    I think where I am tring to go with this is:
    (Maybe)Propadrol is to Max LMG what Pheraplex is to Ergomax

    propadrol could be a metabolite (altered or not) of Max LMG ~ the one responsable for the majority of the anabolic activity
    ??????????????????????
  9. Registered User
    TeamSavage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,007
    Rep Power
    601

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by xtraflossy
    maybe someone can chime in on IF this above artical has anything to do with anything...
    I think where I am tring to go with this is:
    (Maybe)Propadrol is to Max LMG what Pheraplex is to Ergomax

    propadrol could be a metabolite (altered or not) of Max LMG ~ the one responsable for the majority of the anabolic activity
    ??????????????????????
    My understanding is that Pheraplex isn't a metabolite of ErgoMax, it's simply 100% of the active isomer whereas ErgoMax is a 50/50 mix of the active and inactive isomers. Basically, PP and ErgoMax are the same compound, PP is just twice as active.

    This does not appear to be the case with Propadrol, as it looks like a different compound altogether (albeit possibly a similar one).

    I'm not a chem expert, though, so somebody correct me if I'm wrong.
  10. Board Supporter
    xtraflossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,930
    Rep Power
    12328

    Reputation

    It was a comaprrision, since they (MAX LMG and this Propadrol) look so related,.. In addition to the pubmed artical about metabolizing Gona-4,9(10)-dienes.

    (ERGO was an 70/30 mix of 2 and 3-ene (DMT). your right about the 2-ene being more anabolic then the 3-ene)

    But: DMT was a single compound, with these two metabolites combined. Pheraplex is technically no longer DMT, as that name implies the mixture of both.

    Anyways...
    R = alkyl of 1 to 3 carbon atoms

    Max LMG is 13-ethyl-3-methoxy-gona-2,5(10)-diene-17-one
    Propadrol is 12-ethyl-3-methoxy-gona-diene

    So Iguess I have 2 questions (let me know if Im beating a dead horse here..)

    1) Are there carbon atoms that can be taken away from the 13-ethyl? (which would make it the 12-ethyl in Propadrol...??)

    2) What part of the chain are the .-spiro-1',2'-o xiranes??
    (what the hell is a "xiranes"???)


    MAX LMG = Max LMG is 13-ethyl-3-methoxy-gona-2,5(10)-diene-17-one
    Looks just like
    3-methyoxy-13.beta.-R-gona-2,5(10)-diene-17.beta.-spiro-1',2'-o xiranes. (worded differently)

    and These are metabolites of LMG....

    "first to 17beta-hydroxy-17alpha.-CH.sub.2 X-13. beta.-R-gon-5(10)-en-3-one, "

    then to the:

    "17.beta.-hydroxy-17.alpha.-CH.sub.2 X-13.beta.-R-gona-4,9(10)-diene-3-ones of formula I."


    ~Propadrol is 12-ethyl-3-methoxy-gona-diene

    Im just tring to account where the 12 comes from )I think
    Last edited by xtraflossy; 11-08-2006 at 03:11 PM.
  11. Elite Member
    yeahright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,368
    Rep Power
    10344

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by TeamSavage
    My understanding is that Pheraplex isn't a metabolite of ErgoMax, it's simply 100% of the active isomer whereas ErgoMax is a 50/50 mix of the active and inactive isomers. Basically, PP and ErgoMax are the same compound, PP is just twice as active.

    This does not appear to be the case with Propadrol, as it looks like a different compound altogether (albeit possibly a similar one).

    I'm not a chem expert, though, so somebody correct me if I'm wrong.
    I don't think it's active and inactive isomers. I think Ergomax is a mix of isomers that are both active but one of which causes some negative side-effects. PP being the isolated isomer which has a purer benefit/cost profile.

    If it were active and inactive, you'd expect to have to dose Ergo twice as high as PP and that's not the case. People dose them the same.
  12. Elite Member
    yeahright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,368
    Rep Power
    10344

    Reputation
  13. Registered User
    TeamSavage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,007
    Rep Power
    601

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by yeahright
    I don't think it's active and inactive isomers. I think Ergomax is a mix of isomers that are both active but one of which causes some negative side-effects. PP being the isolated isomer which has a purer benefit/cost profile.

    If it were active and inactive, you'd expect to have to dose Ergo twice as high as PP and that's not the case. People dose them the same.
    Interesting. Thanks for the clarification.
  14. Elite Member
    yeahright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,368
    Rep Power
    10344

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by TeamSavage
    Interesting. Thanks for the clarification.
    Oh, I could be wrong. Don't take my word for gospel. That's just my understanding.
  15. Board Supporter
    xtraflossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,930
    Rep Power
    12328

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by yeahright
    I don't think it's active and inactive isomers. I think Ergomax is a mix of isomers that are both active but one of which causes some negative side-effects. PP being the isolated isomer which has a purer benefit/cost profile.

    If it were active and inactive, you'd expect to have to dose Ergo twice as high as PP and that's not the case. People dose them the same.
    I said that the 2-ene was the MORE anabolic/active.
    I Love ergo- I like Erog better then Phera,.. Both the 2/3-ene are active and anabolic.
    I of course beleive that the 3-ene is the more androgenic of the two isomers. I got hella hard, strong, ripped, and sex drive was better then on Phera (2-3n3 alone).

    Anyways,.. Im not tring to go on about Ergomax, or Phera.
  16. New Member
    Beebs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Age
    29
    Posts
    189
    Rep Power
    200

    Reputation

    I don't know if I would ever try something with the words "gona-die" in its formula.
  17. Elite Member
    yeahright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,368
    Rep Power
    10344

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Beebs
    I don't know if I would ever try something with the words "gona-die" in its formula.
    ROFL
  18. Board Supporter
    xtraflossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,930
    Rep Power
    12328

    Reputation

    Thought I might bump this, see if anyone who hasn't been around for a while might be able to offer an opinion bout this stiff chemically
  19. board observer
    Moyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Age
    31
    Posts
    879
    Rep Power
    572

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by EST Rep
    "As you see, Propadrol consists of 2 separate compounds. I really can’t compare it to an existing product in the market place -- but I will try ….

    6-17 dihydroxyetiochlone-3-ol-proponate, metabolizes quickly and increases endogenous levels of testosterone

    12-ethyl-3-methoxy-gona-diene 17 – unique , but if I had too compare it to anything , I would compare to the now discontinued Max LMG… Again, ours is structured differently & I am sure you know that changing a compound slightly can alter how a compound metabolizes, aromatizes, etc…"
    Also, aren't the dosages of these two products quite different (Xmass requires a much larger dose)?
  20. board observer
    Moyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Age
    31
    Posts
    879
    Rep Power
    572

    Reputation

    Also, does anyone have more info on the other ingredient in Propadrol?

    6-17 dihydroxyetiocholone-3-ol proponate
  21. Senior Member
    b unit's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  242 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,646
    Rep Power
    1422

    Reputation

    i don't know about the chemistry side of it but 40caps per bottle is crazy!!!
  22. 191cm, 98kg (6'3, 215lb)
    solarize's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Age
    33
    Posts
    404
    Rep Power
    317

    Reputation

    Agree, I prefer Ergo over PP anyday of the week.

    Quote Originally Posted by xtraflossy
    I said that the 2-ene was the MORE anabolic/active.
    I Love ergo- I like Erog better then Phera,.. Both the 2/3-ene are active and anabolic.
    I of course beleive that the 3-ene is the more androgenic of the two isomers. I got hella hard, strong, ripped, and sex drive was better then on Phera (2-3n3 alone).

    Anyways,.. Im not tring to go on about Ergomax, or Phera.
  23. Banned
    pistonpump's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  225 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Age
    30
    Posts
    12,105
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    sorry OT but if ergo is liked for the most part more than phera then i really have to find some. But then again i like being stronger, harder, and more horny, fukk it, I love Phera!
  24. Recovering AXoholic
    thesinner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Age
    28
    Posts
    10,063
    Rep Power
    11889

    Reputation

    Max LMG is 13-ethyl-3-methoxy-gona-2,5(10)-diene-17-one
    Propadrol is 12-ethyl-3-methoxy-gona-diene
    Differences I noticed in their nomenclature:

    I have never heard of, seen, or been able to look up the functional group: gona-.

    Max LMG is 13-ethyl, the functional group is not only on a different carbon, but the pi bond between #13 and #14 will disappear to accomodate. For 12-ethyl, there's not carbon double bonds, and a proton is stripped for alkylation.

    The two olefins (diene) on Max LMG are set on the 2 and 5 carbons. For propadrol, numbers are not assigned, implying that it may be a mixture of isomers.

    17-one implies that there is a ketone (oxygen double bonded to the carbon) group on the 17-carbon.

    *Disclaimer: I am still working on my degree, and companies are notorious for only giving part of the compound name.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
  25. Board Supporter
    xtraflossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,930
    Rep Power
    12328

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by pistonpump
    sorry OT but if ergo is liked for the most part more than phera then i really have to find some. But then again i like being stronger, harder, and more horny, fukk it, I love Phera!
    ERGO will do all this BETTER then Phera. (Not so much IMO, but 3-ene is VERY androgenic)
  26. Banned
    pistonpump's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  225 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Age
    30
    Posts
    12,105
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    i need to find some ergo. sounds like ergo phera stack would be sweet! but, back to the topic.
  27. board observer
    Moyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Age
    31
    Posts
    879
    Rep Power
    572

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by pistonpump
    i need to find some ergo. sounds like ergo phera stack would be sweet!
  28. Elite Member
    yeahright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,368
    Rep Power
    10344

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by pistonpump
    i need to find some ergo. sounds like ergo phera stack would be sweet! but, back to the topic.
    You could blend them but don't stack them. The compounds are so similar that they could be considered interchangeable. So you might do 10mg PP and 10mg Ergo to be the equivalent of what would otherwise be a 20mg PP or Ergo dose....but don't double-up on them thinking that they'll have some synergistic effect.

    The thoughts at the time when PP was first released was that since they were so similar, this combination was essentially an exception to the "don't stack methyls" rule.

    I know of people who did this without apparent ill effect. Your mileage may vary.
  29. Registered User
    wojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    1,902
    Rep Power
    1097

    Reputation

    i just threw out 2 bottles of ergo hated it. did it literally last night..lol
  30. Banned
    pistonpump's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  225 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Age
    30
    Posts
    12,105
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by yeahright
    You could blend them but don't stack them. The compounds are so similar that they could be considered interchangeable. So you might do 10mg PP and 10mg Ergo to be the equivalent of what would otherwise be a 20mg PP or Ergo dose....but don't double-up on them thinking that they'll have some synergistic effect.

    The thoughts at the time when PP was first released was that since they were so similar, this combination was essentially an exception to the "don't stack methyls" rule.

    I know of people who did this without apparent ill effect. Your mileage may vary.
    Sorry my vocab was off there but that's what i meant guys. Instead of 30mg pp, ratio it out to add up to 30mg between the two compounds. Maybe experiment with 20mg ergo 10mg pp or 10mg ergo 20mg pp etc. to find the right mix.
  31. Board Supporter
    xtraflossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,930
    Rep Power
    12328

    Reputation

    ERGO was a 70/30 mix of the two isomers.
    The 2-ene was the lower portion of it.

    There WOULD be a synnergistic effect when stacking PP with it -kinda-sorta.
    Phera on it's own does wonders anabolicly,.. if you could also make phera much more androgenic, you'd have,.. um Ergo. But the Ergo wouldn't be as anabolic dose per dose as the phera.

    IF, you threw in some phera with the Ergo, to equate to your "normal dose" of phera, you'd see a major difference in the way things would turn out.
    Kinda like a Phera cycle with something very androgenic thrown in, that is also anabolic.

    If you just upped the dose of Ergo until you hit 20mg of 2-ene, you'd be poppin over 4 pills daily of Ergo. And the sides would become apparent.

    I love the stuff. I felt like a beast on it. I looked the part too, and Imoved some serious weight.
    I never got anything like that with Phera.
  32. New Member
    bigSMokey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    141
    Rep Power
    174

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by thesinner
    Differences I noticed in their nomenclature:

    I have never heard of, seen, or been able to look up the functional group: gona-.
    Never knew what it meant either. So I did some digging and found that gona- comes from gonane which is basically the carbon skeleton of test with both methyls stripped off. Or, androstane without the two methyls, if you prefer.

    It turns out that gonane is in the analagous line of the androgen structures that we're used to. It's estrane (deca skeleton) with it's one methyl removed, or androstane (test skeleton) with both methyls removed.
  33. New Member
    bigSMokey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    141
    Rep Power
    174

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by xtraflossy

    So Iguess I have 2 questions (let me know if Im beating a dead horse here..)

    1) Are there carbon atoms that can be taken away from the 13-ethyl? (which would make it the 12-ethyl in Propadrol...??)
    Yes there are carbon atoms that can be removed and they have all been removed. With propadrol, the ethyl is simply moved one over to the 12, and the 13 position of course is left with a hydrogen.

    So, with MAX LMG you had the familiar 13-ethyl as seen in the BALCO labs "scandal" compound norbolethone. Norbol was a nandrolone derivative, starting with the methyl being lengthened to an ethyl.

    With MAX you had alkylation in the familar "dip" (the "fused" carbon, at C-13. See the attachment in thesinner's post for clarity). But, with this propadrol, you have a fairly unusual alkylation on the outer ring area, midmoleule. This area is a very uncommon place for alkylation in anabolic steroids.

    Quote Originally Posted by xtraflossy
    2) What part of the chain are the .-spiro-1',2'-o xiranes??
    (what the hell is a "xiranes"???)
    An oxirane is an epoxide (think "havoc" with an oxygen instead of sulfur). However, it appears this compound is part of the synthesis and is not an actual anabolic.
  34. Board Supporter
    xtraflossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,930
    Rep Power
    12328

    Reputation

    Damn - BigSmonkey, your the MAN!!
    I'd give all the reps I could to you for this, but apparently, I have already done this, and need to spread some love.

    But I will.........
  35. Recovering AXoholic
    thesinner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Age
    28
    Posts
    10,063
    Rep Power
    11889

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by bigSMokey
    Never knew what it meant either. So I did some digging and found that gona- comes from gonane which is basically the carbon skeleton of test with both methyls stripped off. Or, androstane without the two methyls, if you prefer.

    It turns out that gonane is in the analagous line of the androgen structures that we're used to. It's estrane (deca skeleton) with it's one methyl removed, or androstane (test skeleton) with both methyls removed.
    Thanks for clarifying the infamous gona- group. Reps!
  36. New Member
    bigSMokey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    141
    Rep Power
    174

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by xtraflossy
    Damn - BigSmonkey, your the MAN!!
    I'd give all the reps I could to you for this, but apparently, I have already done this, and need to spread some love.

    But I will.........
    Thanks man, it's appreciated. I'm glad you found and brought up the structural analogy between propadrol and MAX LMG. Due to all the hype, I was considering trying the prop, but since it so closely resembles MAX LMG, I'm gonna wait for more feedback. MAX was not very well liked by many, and that's with having the nandrolone-type structure. Without it, propadrol may be even worse. But then again, maybe moving that ethyl group and removing that nandro resemblance could aleviate some/all of the progestin side effects. And I believe that progestin issues were the main complaint with MAX. But anyways, reps.
  37. Ron Paul... phuck yeah!
    riskarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    611
    Rep Power
    438

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by pistonpump
    i need to find some ergo. sounds like ergo phera stack would be sweet! but, back to the topic.
    Ha, I am the only guy that bought 20 bottles of ergo when N-P was blowing it out?
  38. Board Supporter
    xtraflossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,930
    Rep Power
    12328

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by riskarb
    Ha, I am the only guy that bought 20 bottles of ergo when N-P was blowing it out?
    Put this on my list of dumb things Ive done, but I stocked up on what I THOUGHT was erog, but was actually a SD clone...which was later found to be nothing but DHEA
  39. 191cm, 98kg (6'3, 215lb)
    solarize's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Age
    33
    Posts
    404
    Rep Power
    317

    Reputation

    EDITED POST: Don't do this using AM resources please.
    Last edited by yeahright; 01-19-2007 at 10:01 PM.
  40. Elite Member
    stxnas's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  195 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Age
    33
    Posts
    9,977
    Rep Power
    969164

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Moyer View Post
    Also, does anyone have more info on the other ingredient in Propadrol?

    6-17 dihydroxyetiocholone-3-ol proponate
    I know this is an old thread, but I just answered this on another forum. I thought I would throw up my post here for anybody else that is wondering the same thing...it's an AI.

    This is a quote from ARLI:
    "6,17-dioxo-etiocholene-3-ol (A.K.A. 3-OHAT) is a natural occurring metabolite of the popular anti-aromatase supplement 4-androstene- 3,6,17-trione (AT) mentioned prior. It possesses a much longer half-life (stays active in the body longer) thus allowing for improved efficiency from a single daily dosage. Additionally it is noted as a non-androgenic aromatase inhibitor. This means that 3-OHAT is an excellent fast-acting long-term destroyer of the testosterone limiting Estrogen-Negative-Feed-Back-Loop...and does not stimulate androgen receptors of the hypothalamus and the Androgen-Negative-Feed-Back-Loop. Studies have shown that even acting alone, 3-OHAT increases HPTA activity resulting in more testosterone production via natural pathways in humans and animals."
    RcB Since 09-06-2011 20:55 EST, Post 49
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Max Lmg anabolic-androgenic ratio!
    By dannyn2007 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-19-2011, 09:46 PM
  2. Max LMG or Propadrol?
    By MentalTwitch in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-03-2008, 04:59 PM
  3. Max LMG vs. Propadrol
    By Wilderbeast in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-07-2007, 10:09 AM
  4. Max LMG...for u r interested!!!
    By diezzel in forum Supplements
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-31-2005, 07:04 PM
  5. Got my new Anabolic Insider today.....
    By YellowJacket in forum General Chat
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-05-2003, 10:38 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in