phenomenal article on drol and dbol

glenihan

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
this was posted on professional muscle by and written by Almost Pro .. bear in mind he was a top national level competitor and his dosages should not be considered normal .. also consider this isn't for newbies

The Great Oral Debate: Anadrol vs. Dianabol
By Gavin Kane

For many years, a great debate has raged over which oral is superior for mass gains, and two of them have stood the test of time; dianabol and anadrol. The debate has continued, arguing which of the two is superior, yet no conclusive evidence has proven one better than the other. People respond to each one differently, some swearing by dbol and some swearing by anadrol. Before we declare one the winner, I am going to go over a bit of history and chemical structure on both products.

Anadrol (oxymetholone) was first made available in the 1960’s by Syntex. It is very effective at increasing red blood cell production and was promising for treating severe cases of anemia. With the advent of newer and more advanced drugs such as Erythropoietin, which have less androgenic side effects, Anadrol was discontinued. New studies in AIDS/HIV patients revealed Anadrol was particularly effective at reducing wasting symptoms so it was re-released in the late 1990’s.

Oxymetholone is a derivative of dihydrotestosterone, which in theory means it should not convert to estrogen. Since it does not aromatize but still causes gynecomastia in some users, there are other pathways by which it converts. After looking at studies on AIDS patients, I found that it may convert by actively activating the estrogen receptor, so this is a product that would need an anti-estrogen such as Nolvadex.

Dianabol (methandrostenolone) was first made in 1956 by John Zieglar of Ciba fame. Dianabol has been one of the most popular oral steroids of all time, exploding in popularity in the 1970’s with bodybuilders and football players and expanding into all avenues of athletics during the 1980’s. It somewhat waned during the 1990’s with the steroid control act, but was hot again in the early 2000’s with reproduction in mass quantities by Mexican labs and underground labs.
Methandrostenolone is a derivative of testosterone and hence will convert to estrogen. Gyno will be a concern for sure, in almost all users, whereas only less than 25% have problems with Anadrol. Again water retention will be a problem, usually due to the estrogenic properties.

Both products will have similar androgenic side effects, which include; acne, water retention, oily skin, male pattern baldness, and increased body hair growth. Both drugs are c17 alpha alkylated, therefore liver protection will be necessary, especially when combining the two.

So we come to the premise of this article, Anadrol vs. Dianabol. Why, the great debate over which product to take? They work on different pathways, have similar side effects you will have to combat, and both are liver toxic. So why is there a debate over which is better and which one should you take? Well, as I stated earlier, different people have different responses to each product. Many people, including myself, find high doses of Anadrol to be too much to handle in trade of the results you get. With this product, I have an extreme loss of appetite, massive water retention, and overall aches and pains and headaches.

On the other hand, when I take Dianabol, I get a general sense of well-being, good but not great size gains, and the ability to keep eating. It sounds like I should keep taking Dianabol and drop the Anadrol, right? Wrong. I get massive male pattern baldness from Dianabol, which I do not experience from Anadrol. I have an increase in blood pressure levels at doses that are high enough to match my gains from Anadrol, and I have to shorten my cycles because of the massive dosages I take to get good gains. So in all, I get some side effects from each that I would like to avoid, while still retaining the great benefits that I can only get from each product.

Anadrol is well known for its ability to cause massive size and strength increases, and as we all know, a stronger muscle has to become a bigger muscle with enough calories to feed it. Dianabol gives me large, quality muscle gains without as much water retention as Anadrol. So what is the compromise? Do I take one during one cycle and then the other product during my next cycle?

The answer is no to both. There is no need to short change yourself gains in either department when you can have your cake and eat it too. I am not alone in my assessments of both products. Most guys have similar issues of massive water retention, headaches and loss of appetite with Anadrol, and MPB and fewer gains with Dianabol comparatively. So, the best thing we can do is decrease our dosages of both products to cut down on side-effects and take them at the same time to increase the benefits.

My recommendation is to take both products in lower dosages but for longer periods of time. Dianabol has been found to work much better for quality gains when taken in lower dosages but for longer periods of time. High doses have severe side effects in some users, a loss of all gains with cessation of the product because of the short cycle (4-6 weeks) and most of the aforementioned side-effects.

Your dosages will be cycle history dependent but when I was at the peak of my career, I was taking cycles of 200mg Dianabol for 6 weeks per cycle, or 250-300mg Anadrol per 6 week cycle. In later cycles when I decided to combine the two products together, I was able to drop my Dianabol use to 50mg per day, and my Anadrol use to 100mg per day and because of the synergistic effect of the two products combined, the effect was similar to high doses of each but with none of the sides. There is something very synergistic when taking these two products together with just a simple cycle of testosterone and deca-durabolin.

I would run my Anadrol cycles for 8 weeks at that dose and my Dianabol cycles for 10 weeks at that low dose with no liver toxic effects as proven by my quarterly blood tests. I did not have to take liver protectants, but I recommend them for most users. I no longer had to watch my blood pressure, my water retention was minimal compared to earlier cycles, and I was able to continue eating massive amounts of food because I did not experience appetite loss from a massive dose of Anadrol.

I highly recommend on your next bulking cycle you try the following: A base cycle of test and deca, add in the Anadrol and Dianabol mix, and some Nolvadex. You will be able to control your water retention, liver toxicity, and other side effects by controlling your dosages. Your doses will vary from mine, but just adjust accordingly and run them for longer periods of time. You will be amazed at the simplicity of this cycle and yet the synergy is un-describable. Your gains will be far better than you have ever had when taking each product alone, your side effects will be less than if you were to take either product in higher doses, thanks to the different biochemical pathways. Everyone already knows that test and anadrol, and deca and dbol are very synergistic. Now combine all four in a cycle and watch yourself just blow up.
 

glenihan

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
i would think most on this board would do fine with 25mg dbol and 50mg drol ... if you're into orals and whatnot .. i'll still stay far away
 
3clipseGT

3clipseGT

On my grind
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
i would think most on this board would do fine with 25mg dbol and 50mg drol ... if you're into orals and whatnot .. i'll still stay far away
Test/tren for me! I dont like to hold water. :dance:
 

glenihan

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
personally i find it hard to really put on a ton of mass with tren just because it leans me out so much .. but i have no further plans of competing so i love tren :)
 
3clipseGT

3clipseGT

On my grind
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
personally i find it hard to really put on a ton of mass with tren just because it leans me out so much .. but i have no further plans of competing so i love tren :)
Hence the reason why i love it so much, i need help leaning out! LOL How come you dont plan on competing anymore?
 

glenihan

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
because dieting for a show is AWFUL and the day of the show literally feels like death is right around the corner its so demanding and i'm just not motivated enough to pursuit it at the moment
 

Rage (SoCal)

Board Supporter
Awards
1
  • Established
Heh, Almost Pro is my buddy. Very good guy. It's funny to see his name get mentioned here.

Interesting read for sure.
 

size

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
I think an easier way to explain or at least more importantly(at least in my mind) is that Dbol is stronger mg:mg than anadrol. :)
 
Last edited:
3clipseGT

3clipseGT

On my grind
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
because dieting for a show is AWFUL and the day of the show literally feels like death is right around the corner its so demanding and i'm just not motivated enough to pursuit it at the moment

Yea screw that! Are you comfortable at sub 10% tho like year around?
 

glenihan

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
i stay right around 10% most of the year

now back to the article

size .. could you explain what you mean .. i agree dbol is obviously stronger mg for mg .. but how does that relate to the supposed synergistic effects the author is claiming exist?
 

size

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
size .. could you explain what you mean .. i agree dbol is obviously stronger mg for mg .. but how does that relate to the supposed synergistic effects the author is claiming exist?
Well, from my point of view, I think the most important thing to recognize when comparing the two is that one is stronger than the other when compared mg:mg. So if one is considering using one or the other there needs to be this recognition otherwise one is not accurately representing each drug. Therefore, to me, I believe this is more important than other factors outside of health related issues.

In regards to synergy, I often question this entirely with everything. While individuals like the claim of synergy, I feel suspect about it because it just seems like adding another variable in the equation with much expectation but without explanation. I can and do appreciate user feedback, but without logical and/or scientific explanations I find it difficult to embrace the idea of synergy in regards to all anabolic steroids and supplement usage.
 
Last edited:

glenihan

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
i would love a scientific explanation as well, but often due to the illicit nature of what we do studies aren't available and the research simply isn't done ...

with that said i'm fairly certain dbol and drol operate through different avenues so there may be something to it ...

any one else have anything to share?
 

size

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
A little more that I thought about.
When one considers a synergistic effect, then one is assuming that 1+1=2 no longer holds true but rather 1+1=3 or 4 or any vaule >2. To me, I find it difficult to accept that certain drugs truly have this effect(w/o data), but instead it is just each drug working in the manner that the specific drug is made to work. Once more and more drugs are added to the mixture it becomes even more diluted as to which drug is truly doing what.
 

size

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
with that said i'm fairly certain dbol and drol operate through different avenues so there may be something to it ...
I tend to agree with you here as well. But does this mean that a synergy exists? Or does it simply mean that each drug is performing in the specific way it is designed to?
 

glenihan

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
I tend to agree with you here as well. But does this mean that a synergy exists? Or does it simply mean that each drug is performing in the specific way it is designed to?
that's a great point

but lets assume for this argument that almost pro's anecdotal experience is true for most people

now many people might not see great results from 25mg of dbol mixed with 500mg of test (might only see good results from the test) and the same might be true if you substitute 50mg of drol for the dbol

many might not see great results from 200mg of eq a week with that same test and many might not see great results from 200mg of deca a week with that same test

now apparently combining the low dose dbol and low dose drol gives great gains ... i don't think the same would happen if you combined the low dose eq with the low dose deca

so assuming Almost Pro's anecdote is true, it seems there may be some validity to there being a synergistic effect if you consider that combining other low dose drugs wouldn't really produce great results

(i should note i think many people could get great gains off of 25mg of dbol and 50mg of drol ... this is just my little hypothetical)

...i hope people can follow my reasoning here, i realize it might be a touch convoluted
 
motiv8er

motiv8er

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
because dieting for a show is AWFUL and the day of the show literally feels like death is right around the corner its so demanding and i'm just not motivated enough to pursuit it at the moment
I personally would rather have 10% bf and a good look than try to prep for a show in this moment in my life...

Totally agree with you.
 

Work

Member
Awards
0
Isn't that was Superdrol was supposed to be, the drug between anadrol and dianabol?
 

tattoopierced1

Guest
jeez.. drol and dbol AND nolva... that would KILL my liver....
 

CHAPS

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
I like the idea sounds good to me, i'll try it out down the road and post my results.
 

glenihan

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
Isn't that was Superdrol was supposed to be, the drug between anadrol and dianabol?
superdrol is methylated masteron

structurally speaking its not "between" drol and dbol ... that was just a description ... one i don't really feel is particularly apt

the point of the article is that combining low dose drol and dbol should give better results with less sides than higher doses of either separately
 
motiv8er

motiv8er

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Isn't that was Superdrol was supposed to be, the drug between anadrol and dianabol?
Hey Work,
I beleive what you are thinking about is the relationship of SD of being between drol and masteron. To quote MC, the sweet spot between. SD being dry and explosive as opposed to being wet and explosive.
 

CHAPS

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
Superdrol would be good when combined with more of an androgen, like d-bol, maybe 10-20 mg superdrol with 20mg or so of d-bol.
 
Ubiquitous

Ubiquitous

Registered User
Awards
1
  • Established
SD being dry and explosive as opposed to being wet and explosive.


MmmmMMMmmMmmm .... ... ... explosive. :D

For what it's worth, I know guys that stack Drol and Dbol and swear by it. But they're also the guys that want to compete and don't take into account their quality of health as much as I or the next guy.

If doing this, as it's probably been stated, blood panels are a neccessity.. especially considering the duration outlined.

Hepatotoxicity may be overblown.. who knows... but on which side would you rather err.. caution, or recklessness?

The pursuit of their self-defined excellence so quickly can shorten a lifetime of excellence just as quickly.
 

Similar threads


Top