A few things to keep in mind bros:
- Searle developed 1-test to be ORALLY ACTIVE without being hepatoxic that is common to 17-AA modifications.
- The 1-ene double bond placement is what gives the unusual resistance to liver breakdown that is not seen in 4-AD or the nors.
- The 1-ene double bond is shared with the only PH I recommend to be dosed via oral administration instead of transdermal ==-> 1,4-dione or -diol
- A fairly good estimate of first pass yield would be around the 10-15% mark and NOT the 5% that is the norm with oral PH's.
With this said, transdermal dosing will still yield a higher percent of absorption (or a equatable amount first pass) but may still provide an alternative. IMO, I would rather rub than swallow powdered hell but some bros in the Cajun states might appreciate the fire
Chemo
Funny, my first cycle ever was 1AD. Worked like a charm.
Second was Sauce by Syntrax. Did **** for me.
Since then the only thing that has come close or surpassed my 1AD cycle is transdermal 1T.
After reading more into it and reading more reviews about lack of results from oral 1T I came to the conclusion that 1T must not be very orally active. Granted that was w/o real research into it but I have yet to one review of an oral 1T product other than ethergels or TU that have produced significant results.
Not questioning you Chemo but thus far real world results do not point to 1T being very orally active.