ALRI stops production
- 10-24-2005, 10:35 PM
ALRI stops production
What nobody elso got this today???
Sent : Monday, October 24, 2005 7:59 PMTo : "[email protected]" <[email protected]>Subject : ALRI Public Notice:||Junk E-Mail|InboxWe've identified this mail as junk. Please tell us if we were right or wrong by clicking Junk or Not Junk Public Notice:Effective immediately, Applied Lifescience Research Industries, Inc., has ceasedproduction, marketing and sale of all Ergomax LMG, Prostanozol and similarproducts. We are proud of the products that we have developed and marketed tohelp our customers achieve their training and fitness goals. However, while itwas never our objective to create or market supplement products for the purposesof undetectability in doping tests or to undermine fairness in sports in anyway, we have decided that the most appropriate course of action is todiscontinue these products at this time, and to focus instead on continuing tobring you innovative new quality supplements. ALRIwww.alrindustries.com
Last edited by garyd85gt; 10-24-2005 at 10:37 PM. Reason: change
- 10-24-2005, 10:41 PM
Lets hope that AX keeps sellin Prostanozol. I couldnt be happier with it, keepin the fat at bay while im bulking. This is probly whats gonna happen but who knows.
10-24-2005, 10:51 PM
10-24-2005, 10:55 PM
Yeah, and AX has Ergomax also, I dont know if its being sold at online outlets yet, didn't bother to check. I bet it all leads back to the article by that Amy S. character.
10-24-2005, 11:06 PM
Yea probly, but im pretty sure Ax will pick up where Alri left off. Just like they did with SD and stuff. DS doesnt sell it at all anymore even tho its disc. but AX still does, lets just hope they continue with the other stuff. Ill love AX for life if they do!
10-24-2005, 11:20 PM
The Ban II (the sequel) seems to be emerging---ot a Federal mandate at this point, but clearly political and potential legal pressure, coupled with the media hyped supplement/steroid-mania. Apparently it is too much of a risk to keep producing...
10-24-2005, 11:21 PM
10-24-2005, 11:23 PM
AX is through as well since the licensing with ALRI is no longer available to them. Ryan from AX stated that the end of post-ban ph's/ps' is over.
10-24-2005, 11:26 PM
well I guess I am not surprised. Sounds like somebody BIG was or is about to come down on them HARD.
If they still put out that H50 and M-TRN I will be shocked.
10-24-2005, 11:29 PM
10-24-2005, 11:30 PM
10-25-2005, 05:47 AM
10-25-2005, 07:01 AM
It never helps when companies use words that get attention from the public eye...or is that the plan to get people to think they can use something 'legal' to gain size/strength similar to something 'illegal'?
It could be there last push knowing that a ban could come someday so why not use words to grab attention and sell as much as possible? Nice idea if you prefer a short-term billion dollar verses a steady $$...
10-25-2005, 07:45 AM
10-25-2005, 08:08 AM
This what the US gov wants then fine. They think they will stop a billion dollar industry by banning these items. The demand will be met one way or another they are just turning us all into criminals.......see you on the dark side fellas.
10-25-2005, 11:02 AM
Ryan over at AX has stated the ban will most likely be effective in 3 weeks , and will be a blanket ban ..so there will no end around on this .. it seems like it will be banning certain chemical structures and related strings that could be developed. It is truly the end for OTC products like we have now been accustomed to..
10-25-2005, 12:29 PM
boys, i've been on the other side for quite a while now.... and i must say the grass is definetly greener!
10-25-2005, 12:59 PM
this sucks, i wounder how AX is going to still be in business, most of their business came from those supplements, i dont see their being a way around this banOriginally Posted by raiderz
10-25-2005, 01:25 PM
10-25-2005, 01:45 PM
They might not be in business after the ban. I think AX exist for the sole purpose of limiting liablity and impact from the ban.Originally Posted by texas
Pretty much a distribution company that will go away when the products go away.
But I might be absolutly wrong.
10-25-2005, 01:58 PM
I'm more interested if anyone knows about the ban specifics that are supposedly taking place... ?
What constitutes a "blanket-ban" specifically? The wording sounds like anything that promotes a better environment for muscle growth is illegal... I'm hoping they are adding certain compounds to the list only.
10-25-2005, 03:07 PM
10-25-2005, 03:07 PM
10-25-2005, 03:13 PM
Quote:Originally Posted by 50joe
Originally Posted by BillyB
I am not a chem major so please do not hold me to this. I can be totally off point.
In the computer world, I know you can ban 1000's of ip address by banning a string 126.96.36.199 - 188.8.131.52
Can the FDA ban full strings of chems?
Yes, 3 weeks max and it will be public.
10-25-2005, 05:23 PM
10-25-2005, 05:29 PM
I imagine since production has stopped, there will some form of grace period for companies to sell their stock, similar to the 90 day one pre-ban.. after that it will be illegal to possess.Originally Posted by mywetnightmares
10-25-2005, 05:35 PM
well piss. How come, with all the research out there showing that gear can be used responsibly, nobody's been able to organize anything to stand up to the government? I mean its been discussed many times the hypocrisy of banning steroids but keeping alcohol and tobacco legal, and I understand that they're still legal because of their huge lobbies, but why can't we organize something like that. I dunno, it just seems that everyone intelligent is so powerless when it comes to these things and nothing is as it should be.
10-25-2005, 05:43 PM
The main problem is that the general public is kept in the dark about these things, no truthfull information, and tobacco/alcohol companies are in the backpocket of lots of lawmakers.. If supplement companies were to follow suit, we too could get away with murder.. What I do find funny is the fact that many of these anti-supplement knobs are poppin' Centrum Silver and DHEA on a daily basis..Originally Posted by mywetnightmares
10-25-2005, 05:56 PM
There should be some sort of grassroots organization who's sole mission is to inform, no slant period. Niether one way or the other. That's what I think is the problem with the legalize weed movement(which I don' support, just using an example). It fails because all the guys out there trying to get it legalize try to portray it as having zero side effects and being completely safe. While it's probly safer than it's often portrayed, nobody is ever gonna believe that something like weed is gonna be side effect free. If there was an honest campaign just to inform people of the benefits, and moderate risks of gear, and to compare alcohol and tobacco to gear I'll bet we might not be in this mess.
10-25-2005, 06:06 PM
Similar Forum Threads
- By dertynasty in forum AnabolicsReplies: 0Last Post: 08-20-2005, 02:46 PM
- By JBlaze in forum AnabolicsReplies: 19Last Post: 11-29-2004, 08:16 PM
- By goes4ever in forum AnabolicsReplies: 21Last Post: 11-04-2004, 10:55 AM
- By Grant in forum AnabolicsReplies: 2Last Post: 08-20-2004, 09:50 AM