New from ALRI
- 09-21-2005, 02:14 PM
New from ALRI
Anyone know about this stuff? One of the ones mentioned a couple of months ago by ALR and BK?
- 09-21-2005, 02:21 PM
- 09-21-2005, 02:30 PM
09-21-2005, 02:34 PM
09-21-2005, 02:37 PM
That was one of the ones that was on the list from earlier, and is the only one that chemically matches up with the name.
09-21-2005, 02:44 PM
You misunderstand....Originally Posted by JonesersRX7
I mean the 'They said it couldnt be done, so we did it' type stuff...
Just love it... they should play the rocky theme or something!
09-21-2005, 02:46 PM
09-21-2005, 02:57 PM
09-21-2005, 03:46 PM
09-21-2005, 03:48 PM
09-21-2005, 03:52 PM
09-21-2005, 03:56 PM
09-21-2005, 04:06 PM
09-21-2005, 04:14 PM
09-21-2005, 04:39 PM
Thats a good point, I wonder where we will be able to ask questions. Maybe emailing them will ahev to do.
09-21-2005, 04:46 PM
Well here's what kneller wrote come time ago that may give insight into the potential active of this product.
Originally Posted by kneller
09-21-2005, 04:48 PM
09-21-2005, 05:10 PM
Wow PA gave it a "may be effective". I'm still gonna need some feedback before hoping on the bandwagon here.
09-21-2005, 07:58 PM
Hopefully, we will start to see ALR, Raven, and the others coming back around to discuss the newer ALRI products.
09-21-2005, 11:31 PM
I don't think you'll see them come back, not worth there time. Every post before said ALRI screwing everyone on E-Max (which they weren't) and going crazy on them, for no reason. I wouldn't come back if I was running the company
09-22-2005, 01:49 AM
That would be good to see, I had great results with my Emax cycle and am looking forward to any future products by ALRI.Originally Posted by size
09-22-2005, 01:50 AM
I love alri and their products but you have to admit doing a "last run" then selling the rights is still a pretty dirty tactic. Also, they lied about what was in dominator. Thats two strikes against them. They are a very innovative company, no doubt, but they are also somewhat shady in my opinion. But I guess thats the risk we take in this "grey area" that we all love to play in.Originally Posted by bigblank69
09-22-2005, 05:09 PM
09-22-2005, 05:38 PM
09-22-2005, 05:48 PM
09-22-2005, 08:38 PM
09-22-2005, 09:31 PM
09-23-2005, 03:19 PM
I could be wrong but I remember thinking it would be similar to a nandrolone, low androgenic sides, but still good for bulking.
09-23-2005, 03:53 PM
With the 4-OH attachment, I doubt it would be good for bulking as it would have an affinity to display some anti-estrogenic effects as well. I am excited about this one also, and am also excited for PRIME after speeking with ALR.Originally Posted by Knowbull
09-23-2005, 06:15 PM
Didn't you guys read all of Kneller's post? There is only one candidate that matches the nomenclature:
and of course, what stack would be complete without dbol?
4-hydroxy-17a-methyl-androsta-1,4-dien-3-one (dbol, no bloat, non-aromatizing)