Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

ATD

You mean like on or around the nipples for tough gyno or something? Or a general dermal for systemic delivery? That would only offer a slow release effect I'd think. It may require higher doses than oral though, haven't tried it so I'm only guessing.
 
DR.D said:
You mean like on or around the nipples for tough gyno or something? Or a general dermal for systemic delivery? That would only offer a slow release effect I'd think. It may require higher doses than oral though, haven't tried it so I'm only guessing.
Click to expand...

Would a site specific dermal help w/ stubborn gyno...I used one bottle of RXT and there was only minimal gyno loss.
 
Grmlock said:
Would a site specific dermal help w/ stubborn gyno...I used one bottle of RXT and there was only minimal gyno loss.
Click to expand...

I'm not totally sure, but I don't see why not
 
I would think transdermal bio would be greater than oral seeing as how trans is realistically 20-25%. I doubt oral would be even half that, I think aromasin was 3% so I'd assume ATD to be similar. AS for hte site speicifc/localized trans, I've yet to see an effective product. You'd be better off just using it as a systematic carrier as that;s how it's going to turn out.
 
I thought I heard something about the molecular weight being over 300, therefore it would not be a good candidate for topical delivery. Please correct me if Im wrong.
 
Sky9 said:
I thought I heard something about the molecular weight being over 300, therefore it would not be a good candidate for topical delivery. Please correct me if Im wrong.
Click to expand...

The MW is 284.4 actually, but the cut-off is closer to 400 in my experience.
 
DR.D said:
The MW is 284.4 actually, but the cut-off is closer to 400 in my experience.
Click to expand...
Do you see DS making a local topical or releasing the pure powder anytime in the future Doc?

O14
 
Odessa14 said:
Do you see DS making a local topical or releasing the pure powder anytime in the future Doc?

O14
Click to expand...

I have heard no talk of topical gels or powders in the immediate future. That would be a marketing choice, and I don't always get a say in that. We have a killer delivery system already developed if we ever do a topical, I can tell you that. Email Matt and Steve, demand topical! (LOL) Really though, as eager as I have been to do one, you would need to speak up and let DS know if you want something specific. It takes a long time to develop a new product so a lot of customer demand would be required to get it going I suppose.
 
DR.D said:
I have heard no talk of topical gels or powders in the immediate future. That would be a marketing choice, and I don't always get a say in that. We have a killer delivery system already developed if we ever do a topical, I can tell you that. Email Matt and Steve, demand topical! (LOL) Really though, as eager as I have been to do one, you would need to speak up and let DS know if you want something specific. It takes a long time to develop a new product so a lot of customer demand would be required to get it going I suppose.
Click to expand...

Well, Thanks for the heads-up Doc!

I guess all of us here at AM need to chime in....I'm sure people would be interested, esp since the good doc has given the thumbs up on the delivery system....Sounds good to me.


O14
 
Sky9 said:
I thought I heard something about the molecular weight being over 300, therefore it would not be a good candidate for topical delivery. Please correct me if Im wrong.
Click to expand...
Dude, you rock, how do you know all this ****
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top