Trestolone, MENT, Any info out there on it?

Page 2 of 7 First 1234 ... Last

  1. 75:120 is the same as 5:8, so 18:41 is much stronger in the anabolic:androgenic ratio


  2. Quote Originally Posted by bigman420
    75:120 is the same as 5:8, so 18:41 is much stronger in the anabolic:androgenic ratio
    Use the division tool on you calculator

    75:120 > 18:41 (ana:andr)
    •   
       


  3. im not gonna use it either after 2 M1T cycles im staying low on orals

  4. Quote Originally Posted by kwyckemynd00
    Use the division tool on you calculator

    75:120 > 18:41 (ana:andr)
    I think he means just the ratios. MT is 1.6 and Mib is 2.3, so even though Mib has lower potentcy, it's lower androgenicity, relative to it's anabolic strength, makes it look better suited as a anabolic than MT.

  5. Quote Originally Posted by quigs
    So if one were to make an oral solution...with PG for instance...do you agree that 20-40mg would be an effective oral dose? I'm referring to the MENT by the way.
    It should be about 2.5x as androgenic and 5.9x as anabolic as methyltestosterone by oral delivery. 15-20mg would be a good starting dose. Androgenic sides may be the limiting factor on how much you can use. That's just going by the books, in 'real life' something closer to 40mg may be required.
    •   
       


  6. hate to be the one asking, but what is PG?

  7. Quote Originally Posted by GoFast
    hate to be the one asking, but what is PG?
    you mean Polyethylene Glycol? Common to use to mix up solutions.

  8. Quote Originally Posted by 50joe
    you mean Polyethylene Glycol? Common to use to mix up solutions.
    thnx knew it stood for something like that by reading that post, just wanted that actual name of it for reference, thnx

  9. i yhought that ment was supposed to be an injectable

  10. Quote Originally Posted by s.norman
    i yhought that ment was supposed to be an injectable
    I've read that it should also have pretty good oral availability as well. A transdermal would seem to work well also. Obviously, injectable would be the preferred choice though.

    I'm more curious if anyone is or plans on running MENT in the near future.

  11. I would as long as the hepatoxicity is acceptable. I don't have to worry about suppression...already on HRT.

  12. Quote Originally Posted by Brennon
    I would as long as the hepatoxicity is acceptable. I don't have to worry about suppression...already on HRT.
    Good thing, MENT should shut one down pretty darn quickly.

  13. Quote Originally Posted by Stuntdawg
    Good thing, MENT should shut one down pretty darn quickly.
    Hey I'll be the guinea pig if someone wants to send me some of it.

  14. i'm thinkin about trying it but i'm concerned about 7-methyl-estradiol that it converts into. i wonder if letrozole will take care of this problem.

  15. Quote Originally Posted by s.norman
    i'm thinkin about trying it but i'm concerned about 7-methyl-estradiol that it converts into. i wonder if letrozole will take care of this problem.
    Yes, it will.

  16. Quote Originally Posted by Brennon
    Hey I'll be the guinea pig if someone wants to send me some of it.
    Just buy it yourself. It's not like its expensive...

  17. Quote Originally Posted by quigs
    Just buy it yourself. It's not like its expensive...
    WHAT? This has to be the most expensive compound I've ever seen, even more costly than primo!

  18. Quote Originally Posted by Boss_K
    WHAT? This has to be the most expensive compound I've ever seen, even more costly than primo!
    You're joking?
  19. Cool


    Quote Originally Posted by quigs
    You're joking?
    Geez, I hope so.

  20. $50 per gram is the only price I've seen

  21. Quote Originally Posted by Jeff
    $50 per gram is the only price I've seen
    Ouch! That is a bit pricey. What would you do with the free alcohol anyway, make the most expensive trans know to man! May as well score some Mib. and do sub mg doses.

  22. Quote Originally Posted by quigs
    You're joking?
    No, he's not joking. This stuff costs $.05/mg. The effective dose range is 20-50 mg/day. That would equal $1-$2.50/day if you inject which isn't bad. But if you wanted to go transdermal, the costs would be 3x this. So you're looking at $90-$225 for a months supply.

    Unless you've got deep pockets, injecting is the only way to go imo.

  23. Quote Originally Posted by Bobby Nevada
    No, he's not joking. This stuff costs $.05/mg. The effective dose range is 20-50 mg/day. That would equal $1-$2.50/day if you inject which isn't bad. But if you wanted to go transdermal, the costs would be 3x this. So you're looking at $90-$225 for a months supply.

    Unless you've got deep pockets, injecting is the only way to go imo.
    I've actually read that this compound would still be effective at doses 20-40mg/day orally. I've even read that this compound may be more suited to oral use than transdermal. If this is the case, your $50 gram would yield 25 days @ 40mg/day orally. Most would probably find it wise to start their first week somewhere in the 20-30mg range before ramping up. Seeing as most would probably want to go no more than 4-6 weeks with this compound (at least not at first) that's not too bad IMO. It's on par with many of the other "legal" alternatives out there.

  24. Who's gonna try it orally? I would but I'm 1 week into a 6 week ergomax cycle.

  25. Inject it
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Any supp out there for my situation?
    By Medic in forum Supplements
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-20-2008, 10:57 AM
  2. Any opinions out there on Xlean?
    By freezito in forum Supplements
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-19-2007, 01:39 PM
  3. Any DJs out there need equipment??
    By joebo in forum General Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-16-2007, 12:28 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-20-2007, 08:54 AM
  5. Any golfers out there??
    By lifted in forum General Chat
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-25-2004, 05:41 PM
Log in
Log in