Msten / Halo Poll

6 week run. Which would you prefer?

  • Halo @ 100mg

    Votes: 2 40.0%
  • Msten @ 20mg

    Votes: 3 60.0%
  • Msten @ 40mg

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5

Wilko

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
6 week run. Mild trest backer. Which would you prefer?
 
booneman77

booneman77

Legend
Awards
5
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • Best Answer
Sten. By far. Halo just isn’t that strong by itself and if you’re truly only running the trest as a base you’d want something with a bit more punch
 
Jebrook

Jebrook

Well-known member
Awards
2
  • RockStar
  • Established
Sten. By far. Halo just isn’t that strong by itself and if you’re truly only running the trest as a base you’d want something with a bit more punch
Good point, but Halo at a 100 mg would also be a nice run that should be easier on the health markers. M-Sten should be kept at 20 mg if going 6 weeks. Or at least no more than 30 mg. M-sten has destroyed my lipids every time I approach weeks 4 and beyond.
 
Godstrength

Godstrength

Board Sponsor
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
It depends on your goals imo. If you're wanting to straight out bulk (blow up)definitely go with the m Sten. If you're looking for more of a recomp and lean body mass the Halo would be better in my opinion. I think both will work well with the trest underneath. I think Halo is a little drier so it stacks well w trest.
 
gagandugan

gagandugan

Active member
Awards
1
  • Established
Msten. Although Halo would be very good if you use more Trest. Just keep Msten cycle short - I agree with Jebrook here, it can be really toxic, even with TUDCA.
 

Wilko

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
I'm leaning towards Halo as it has always been a kind mistress with virtually no sides to speak of, but also it doesn't pack the same punch as Msten based on, well, literally every single thing I've ever read.
 

Similar threads


Top