Rebound XT vs 6OXO
- 05-31-2005, 10:29 AM
- 05-31-2005, 10:45 AM
Rebound is 2.4 times stronger on a mg/mg basis absorbed (ki .18 for ATD vs ki .43 for 6-OXO). Also, Rebound may be more bioavailable. Thus, Rebound is probably going to elicit a stronger t response based on an equivalent dosage.
Stacking Nolva and any anti-aramotase is not recomended. Author recently hinted that competitive binding at the hypothalamous may be counterproductive when they are stacked. That said, a low dose of 6-OXO may be beneficial in that it could futher increase t without supressing estrogen.
- 06-02-2005, 10:04 AM
Are you saying there's an issue when taking 6-oxo with Rebound, or just with nolva?
06-02-2005, 05:35 PM
Uhm... interesting. I found very beneficial to add some 6OXO to Nolva and people were recommending Nolva + Rebound.Originally Posted by bow
Can u point to where ALR said that is not a smart idea?
I would like to hear other elucidated opinions on this (Dr.D?)
06-02-2005, 05:40 PM
06-02-2005, 09:43 PM
Did he state the relative binding affinities for these things? If not, I suspect the SERM will win the competition just based on the long t1/2 and the volume of active metabolites in circulation. I doubt this would hurt much, and if the AI in question had a higher affinity and better intrinsic activity, then it would be a good thing.Originally Posted by bow
Similar Forum Threads
- By smthcrmnal26 in forum SupplementsReplies: 4Last Post: 03-05-2007, 08:50 PM
- By aryiman in forum Post Cycle TherapyReplies: 1Last Post: 01-17-2007, 01:56 AM
- By spitboy in forum SupplementsReplies: 34Last Post: 04-19-2006, 03:06 PM
- By smokey the bear in forum Post Cycle TherapyReplies: 11Last Post: 04-14-2006, 12:15 PM
- By nas7 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 27Last Post: 05-21-2005, 11:18 PM