View Poll Results: which gave you a more positive result
- 425. This poll is closed
m1t vs superdrol
- 03-31-2005, 02:37 PM
- 03-31-2005, 02:48 PM
ds's orginal prompt for creating super was a to make a comparable compound to m1t with less sides. Eventhough I dont get **** from either compound, this is a good post. I am suprised this poll wasnt created sooner.
03-31-2005, 03:03 PM
Superdrol beats the my latests m1t 4ad cycles. My first 2 m1t cycles however were the old 1 fast tabs along with 4ad and like many other that had these contaminated tabs there was something "d-ifferent" about them in a way I liked. Still Sd is great.
for SD versus pure m1 test i vote sd.
03-31-2005, 03:10 PM
M1T gave me lots of bad sides. SD gave me lots of good results. Contest over, the clear winner here...SD!!!
03-31-2005, 05:17 PM
03-31-2005, 06:39 PM
SD by far. The strength gains might be a little more because you have to run 4Ad with it, as opposed to SD where you can run it solo. But the SD gains have much better retention. And with M1T, it seems you can't wait for your cycle to be over. But with SD, you feel like you can run it forever.
03-31-2005, 11:33 PM
04-01-2005, 05:56 AM
Here´s my 2 cents:
SD rules because of the lack of sides and the fact that the gains stay on.
04-01-2005, 08:06 AM
04-01-2005, 11:36 AM
Originally Posted by Ator
Ditto. M1T was harsh ****. Now, transdermal 1-test is another story entirely. I still love trans 1-test and will continue to run it in the future.
04-01-2005, 01:38 PM
04-01-2005, 01:46 PM
04-01-2005, 01:55 PM
04-01-2005, 01:57 PM
i kinda agree with Syr. kinda depends on what youre looking for though, i did get better strength gains i think off 1-t trans. but nothing can beat sd for a bulker.
04-01-2005, 02:12 PM
Originally Posted by OmarJackson
Transdermal 1-test at 300 mg's day was better for strenght than SD hands down. I know this is going to be debated by many, but personally speaking, the results were undeniable. However, SD was a better bulker and the sides were less (mostly with respect to lethargy and HTPA supression).
04-01-2005, 02:19 PM
I did a different training program that time, but I couldnt train more frequently like I did on SD.Originally Posted by OmarJackson
I dont keep track of every week weights, thinking at the past.
So, what can i say? I probably had the same strenght gains. It took about 10 days for 1test to kick in for me, that must be taken into account.
04-02-2005, 12:38 PM
I love my stack w/ SD and 1T! As for M1T, what can I say. It's still the strongest steroid I've ever used (about twice as anabolic as SD) But, I'll just use SD at 20mg instead of M1T @ 10mg and be a happy man for all the reasons everyone has already said. The SD gains are not only clean but really stick after the cycle and the sides are nil, so M1T is no longer needed!
04-02-2005, 03:54 PM
Do you think there will be more companies in the SD business? I like M1T myself but the scare recently with gyno made me stop. I have read that not many companies have such a product out. I am also wondering when stores will have it.
04-02-2005, 09:26 PM
I think it's quite impressive that Sledge seems to have achieved exactly what he had hoped to achieve with SD -- M1T effectiveness without the evil sides. Keep it up, Matt.Originally Posted by DR.D
04-02-2005, 09:35 PM
Yeah, he's a great guy alright. Very open to trying new stuff to fill in the holes that nobody else has addressed in the supp biz. Like strong, low side anabolics, and cool, versatile PCT stuff just to name a few. Even fat burners. I hear he has one of the fines endocrine chemists around too to consult and advise him. Kind of a big nerd, but quite a studly dude as wellOriginally Posted by ImJ2x
04-03-2005, 09:46 AM
After 2 - 3 weekers with Superdrol, and experience with M1T, I feel:
Superdrol is the superior lean mass compound
Superdrol is the superior cutting compound
Superdrol is the superior side-effect free compound
Superdrol is the safer compound
There are more stacking options with superdrol
M1T* is the superior strength compound
M1T* is the superior mass compound
*it is assumed you are stacking with 4-ad at least 600mg ED
My Little Site about Hair Loss & Anabolics-
hair loss from steroids dot com
04-03-2005, 03:38 PM
04-03-2005, 06:32 PM
04-05-2005, 10:02 PM
It's funny how people keep saying that SD is side effect free as a general fact. Maybe for you it was, but not in general.
I have used both, and SD is very nice for the effects it has on body composition. But this nasty nausea you can get from it really withholds me from being very positive about this compound. And I'm certainly not the only one, as I've read many other posts about this nausea side effect.
For me, M1T gave me beginning signs of gyno pretty fast. With SD I had none.
SD gains seemed dryer than M1T, less bloat, more vascularity.
I gained pretty much the same in weight using 10 mg M1T or 20 mg SD. But as I said, the SD gains were different in how they looked.
M1T made my balls shrivel up from lemons to grapes in the first week. SD did this a bit slower, after 2 weeks. (By the way, I did M1T for a 2 week cycle, and the SD 3 weeks) At the end of both cycles my nuts had shrunk considerable. With SD they seemed to get back to normal size somewhat quicker but I'm not so sure about this.
04-06-2005, 12:43 AM
have you tired dosing SD with food? for most who experienced nausea this was the solution to that problemOriginally Posted by Reem
Similar Forum Threads
- By TripDog in forum AnabolicsReplies: 38Last Post: 09-26-2007, 09:00 AM
- By Onyohasa in forum AnabolicsReplies: 2Last Post: 02-11-2005, 08:06 AM
- By manfreakca in forum AnabolicsReplies: 9Last Post: 01-03-2004, 06:11 AM
- By jxhopper in forum AnabolicsReplies: 21Last Post: 12-31-2003, 01:01 AM
- By megalug in forum AnabolicsReplies: 16Last Post: 12-22-2003, 08:52 PM