Wanted to see if you guys thought this was possible.
11/20/2004 (Before Red Yeast Rice)
Total Cholesterol: 200
HDL: 45
LDL: 122
Triglycerides 164
1/20/2005 (After Red Yeast Rice)
Total Cholesterol: 123
HDL: 40
LDL: 61
Triglycerides: 110
Other Information: I ran a 15 day M1T cycle in December, and began supplementing with Red Yeast Rice.
Also, the test on 11/20/2004 was on 8 hours of fasting and in a lab.
Today's test was done at KMART with a 5minute Cholesterol reader. The lady said that not fasting would only hurt cholesterol levels - and she thought my current levels were great. And also said the blood work was legit.
My questions:
*Does this lady know was she's talking about?
*Would the levels had been dramatically different if I had fasted?
11/20/2004 (Before Red Yeast Rice)
Total Cholesterol: 200
HDL: 45
LDL: 122
Triglycerides 164
1/20/2005 (After Red Yeast Rice)
Total Cholesterol: 123
HDL: 40
LDL: 61
Triglycerides: 110
Other Information: I ran a 15 day M1T cycle in December, and began supplementing with Red Yeast Rice.
Also, the test on 11/20/2004 was on 8 hours of fasting and in a lab.
Today's test was done at KMART with a 5minute Cholesterol reader. The lady said that not fasting would only hurt cholesterol levels - and she thought my current levels were great. And also said the blood work was legit.
My questions:
*Does this lady know was she's talking about?
*Would the levels had been dramatically different if I had fasted?