Testplex 450 cycle??
- 04-23-2013, 09:12 PM
Testplex 450 cycle??
Soo I was looking into testplex 450 and I've got mixed reviews about. It claims 15- 25 lbs gains. I do realize it contains 4 methylated prohormones which can't be great for the liver. But they are in moderate doses. A guy at my gym took it and held on to about 14 lbs after post. If someone give me some advice on it or maybe a suggestion for a diff cycle that would be great. I would love to run injection but I have no way of getting my hands on it.
I'm 22 years old
5'11 170lbs (about 4-7% body fat )
I've been lifting about 5 years total, about 2 consecutive.
This would be my 3rd cycle.
I ran ultradrol about 4 months ago and gained about 8 off of that.
- 04-23-2013, 11:22 PM
That should say, "I've been lifting for five years consecutively."
Five years of on-and-off lifting does not equal five years of lifting. With that minimal training experience, you have no business using anabolics. At 22 years of age, you have very little business using anabolics. At 170 pounds even though you've already got two cycles under your belt, your thoughts really should be shifting away from anabolics and toward re-thinking your nutritional strategies and your dedication to physique-building.
But regardless of all that, no, you probably shouldn't use "Testplex 450", for several reasons other your own personal lack of readiness. It has a stupid name which betrays the credibility of the product and its distributor. I've never even heard of this product. There are many reputable sellers in the PH/DS market, but this is not one of them. Four methyls at once is pretty much always a bad idea, but it's especially bad for a novice user and trainer such as yourself.
I'd stop looking at things like "Testplex 450" and start looking at articles on training and nutrition.
04-24-2013, 11:35 AM
Yea I just started getting my diet down about a year and a half ago. I weighed 126 lbs 2 years ago ( very small frame) so I think I'm making decent progress. I think I'll just wait untill I find something better or just go natty for a while. I know I should probably not take ph's at my age and weight but they're so damn fun haha. Thanks for the input though brotha. Much appreciated
04-24-2013, 11:39 AM
when you say 4-7% body fat, i feel like you really mean 10-14% bf. especially if you were 126 2 years ago. thats like claiming 49lbs of pure muscle in 2 years
04-24-2013, 12:10 PM
Well I was originally around 140 before I had to take about 5 months off because off work and a shoulder injury. And when I started back I gained a lot of it back real quick in the first year. You may be right though. I got tested and was 6% bf around Christmas time at 160. You could be right though I've been shoveling down food lately
04-24-2013, 01:31 PM
04-24-2013, 02:36 PM
04-24-2013, 09:37 PM
trainers dont know what theyre doing dont trust us. im a trainer and we're mostly not allowed to do accurate caliper tests because of some of the zones we would have to pinch. if they use anything else, its probly just some cheap electronic scale that is used for a reference point, not for real accuracy
if you have health insurance and you really wanna know your bf, go get a physical and theyll do the electronic calipers that pinch perfectly (not too hard or soft to give a false measurement) or theyll have you do a hydrostatic weigh (most accurate form of bodyfat measurement)
Similar Forum Threads
- By beastmode1987 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 19Last Post: 12-30-2012, 12:58 PM
- By dldocter in forum AnabolicsReplies: 1Last Post: 06-08-2012, 02:30 PM
- By U of R Man in forum AnabolicsReplies: 18Last Post: 11-13-2002, 10:47 AM
- By Matthew D in forum General ChatReplies: 10Last Post: 11-03-2002, 02:55 AM
- By khafra in forum AnabolicsReplies: 2Last Post: 10-28-2002, 12:34 PM