DMSO vs other transdermal carriers

  1. Registered User
    twerp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Age
    32
    Posts
    6
    Rep Power
    123

    DMSO vs other transdermal carriers


    There are a ton of different carriers you can buy. Usually a little over 20 bucks for as little as a 4 oz bottle. My question is, are these more effective than DMSO? I know DMSO can be bought for pretty cheap. As low as around 8 bucks for a 4 oz bottle of 99.9% DMSO. Is DMSO less penetrating? Or are these other systems just better because they don't have the side effects like DMSO breath and whatnot?

    I'm stockpiling powders and prefer the transdermal route...I'd just like to know why I should buy some "transport matrix" over DMSO.

    Can anyone refer me to any studies on penetration efficiency or answer my questions?

    Thanks in advance.

  2. Registered User
    Rogue Drone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,226
    Rep Power
    740

    My study indicates to me that DMSO is an effective enhancement ingredient , but not a substitute for the ingredients in the commercial dermal mixes. Each ingredient has a different reason for being there. I use a 30% DMSO and water mix to spray on the dermal application site about 10 minutes or so before applying the dermal to enhance absorbancy, and then again about an hour after application to carry in the dried dermal residue.

    This I do with carriers without DMFA, with a DMFA carrier like T-gel, unfortuanetly too long unavaliable, this should not be necessary.

    I've never noticed a bad breath/body odor problem from pure DMSO, and my wife, who would definetly say something about it, has not told me that I stink from this.
  3. CONTROLLED LABS CONSULTANT
    Board Sponsor
    pu12en12g's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,148
    Rep Power
    895

    This thread might help you out:

    Make your own local delivery topicals
    •   
       

  4. Registered User
    twerp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Age
    32
    Posts
    6
    Rep Power
    123

    Quote Originally Posted by Rogue Drone
    My study indicates to me that DMSO is an effective enhancement ingredient , but not a substitute for the ingredients in the commercial dermal mixes. Each ingredient has a different reason for being there. I use a 30% DMSO and water mix to spray on the dermal application site about 10 minutes or so before applying the dermal to enhance absorbancy, and then again about an hour after application to carry in the dried dermal residue.

    This I do with carriers without DMFA, with a DMFA carrier like T-gel, unfortuanetly too long unavaliable, this should not be necessary.

    I've never noticed a bad breath/body odor problem from pure DMSO, and my wife, who would definetly say something about it, has not told me that I stink from this.
    Thanks, this is definitely helpful. I also found a post on transdermal recipes... Perhaps this post belongs better over there. Lastly, would it make more sense to up the DMSO concentration for better penetration or is it unnecesary?
  5. Registered User
    Rogue Drone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,226
    Rep Power
    740

    I'm not certain what the optimum DMSO percentage is. I believe 10% or more has good effect. I do know that 100% DMSO is very irritating to the skin, combined with a skin irritant like 1T in a dermal it can get painfully sensitive in the area of ongoing application.
  6. Registered User
    ersatz's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"   lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    The carnival of American decay on parade
    Posts
    1,311
    Rep Power
    784

    First off DMSO should not be used as a carrier. It is an effective penetration enhancer and should be used 10 mins prior application of trans and 30 mins after to pull through residue. The link provide was for topical not transdermal carriers but most of the principles still apply. You could use dmso in the trans itself at a rate of upto 20%, 10% is probably sufficient. Old transdermal products used 40% even upto 80% but they were using dmso as the carrier. Isopropyl Alcohol is often used as a carrier or you can use carbomer 940/934 if you want a gel. I think there was another chemical to add to the carbomer to get the consistency you desire but I can't recall it at the moment.

    As for other penetration enhancers you can use DMFA, oleic acid, and octyl salicylate. Some people confuse d-limonene as a PE but it's oil from citrus rinds and functions as a solvent and as a substitute for propylene glycol which is used to retain moisture in the skin. D-limonene may also have a citrus smell to mask the smell of lower quality dmso.
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Rate Superdrol Vs Other Steroids
    By spitboy2000 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-27-2011, 11:31 AM
  2. Qv test vs. other Brands
    By Thracian in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-11-2005, 02:11 AM
  3. Anybody ever just try lotion for a transdermal carrier?
    By Aeternitatis in forum Supplements
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-13-2005, 11:45 AM
  4. Ephedrine Vs. Yohimbe Transdermal
    By Edge in forum Supplements
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-02-2004, 08:42 PM
  5. GVT vs. others on ph cycle?
    By LakeMountD in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-22-2003, 04:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.