Maybe you guys can help me out with this my buddy and I were comparing the sides vs results for osta and epistane. I told him I was under the impression that osta would be the safer of the two, due to epistane causing shutdown and osta being suppressive but what he said got me thinking. SARMS are still pretty new and from the logs he's read everybody reacts differently and with epistane it's pretty much the same with everyone. I told him I wasn't sure about that. What do you guys think can we say SARMS are a safer option than ph's or is there still not enough info out yet?
Hopefully someone else chimes in because I don't claim to know everything but ill give you my thoughts because I'm researching doing Epi and have done Osta.
Everything has its process and learning the process is the most important thing. From what I have read PH's aren't the best for your body but if you have all of the proper supplements and your PCT is solid and well planned out everyone Seems to be fine. Getting blood work before and after will be helpfull.
If you read up on Osta it has a lot of benefits from what Ive read and doesnt seem to have the negative results down the road ie: inlarged prostate, suppression. but I'm sure it not the best for you either because its not natural. The big thing with Osta is to watch your lipids LDL/HDL levels and there are different supps you can take to help with that. Also my thought is if you are trying to a good deal on Osta and buy some cheat Sh!t that's exActly what you are going to get. Do your research and get the legit stuff
PHs- make sure you have a great PCT planned out and have a SERM on hand. Some many dummies want to get big but a cycle with no PCT is half the battle. This cats end up losing there hard earned gains and get small sacks. Lol. Hopefully that helps