Transdermal 1, 4 diol?
- 11-18-2004, 09:06 PM
Transdermal 1, 4 diol?
Seems like I haven't read much about this.
Is this a viable product, and if so, is it cost effective?
Obviously m1,4 is targeted at those who are looking at the conversion to dbol, but what if one is looking for the different eq type properties that this product provides?
Anyone have experience with this?
- 11-18-2004, 09:42 PM
11-18-2004, 09:44 PM
11-19-2004, 12:01 AM
Depends on how much money you have or willing to spend. 1G/day is what you need with 1,4Diol, so do the math.Originally Posted by PastorofMuppets
11-19-2004, 06:45 AM
11-19-2004, 08:32 AM
11-19-2004, 11:24 AM
I think the transdermal idea is great if stacking with an oral. I will be doing a transdermal 1,4ad cycle soon stacked with m1t...we'll see if I can handle the lethargy.
11-19-2004, 07:22 PM
11-19-2004, 07:47 PM
It's certainly not cost effective. It's $3 a gram, so $3 a day. I'm not even sure EQ costs that much (at least UG EQ).
11-19-2004, 07:58 PM
He didn't really ask about the price. Besides, if you're taking it orally, then Nutraplanet.com is selling 60 caps x 300mg for $35 ("Andropoise 300"). That's $1.94 per gram. If you're taking it transdermally, then maybe that's a different story.
11-19-2004, 08:03 PM
These numbers are pulled out of a hat, no one knows the percentage.Originally Posted by meathead1987
The point is well taken, however, in the 1, 4 diol has a relatively high level of oral bioavailability so you would not gain much by taking it dermally.
11-19-2004, 11:37 PM
I don't know the validity of the numbers. For instance, one brand has it written on their labels that 11% of the dose makes it through orally and actually gets converted to boldenone. They say they came to this conclusion through actually testing.
In any case, even if you believe the availability is the same for oral and transdermal, transdermal still has an advantage. You probably a more consistent dosage throughout the day instead of oral blasts 2 or 3 times. Of course you have to pay for the transdermal medium. This is getting a little off-topic though.
11-20-2004, 12:19 AM
The 11% number is boldenone metabolites in urine which isn't bad at all. And it is actually an average of 7% and 14% in 2 studies I believe.
Similar Forum Threads
- By Syr in forum AnabolicsReplies: 16Last Post: 12-13-2004, 09:26 PM
- By LowKeyLifter in forum AnabolicsReplies: 4Last Post: 12-03-2004, 04:25 PM
- By hamper19 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 13Last Post: 02-26-2003, 09:35 PM
- By xcreed in forum AnabolicsReplies: 5Last Post: 01-13-2003, 10:12 PM
- By Judo Tom in forum AnabolicsReplies: 36Last Post: 11-11-2002, 12:47 PM