From the reports, Trenavar is a decent product but not an apple-to-apple comparison to Trenbolone!
Specifically, it seems to be a decent anabolic product (not scoring high points in the androgenic department which we all have come to love about Trenbolone), hence my analysis.
Well, Trenazone (Dienolone) is said to have a 100/10 (anabolic/androgenic) ratio
Given this, these 2 products seem to appear to be on par with each other in terms of anabolic/androgenic effects.
Trenavar is easier due to the tablet format (Trenazone is transdermal).
However, sides seem to be a little less harsh with the Trenazone and the fear of the unknown with Trenavar scares me a bit.
IF these products were equally priced, which would you chose and why?
Specifically, it seems to be a decent anabolic product (not scoring high points in the androgenic department which we all have come to love about Trenbolone), hence my analysis.
Well, Trenazone (Dienolone) is said to have a 100/10 (anabolic/androgenic) ratio
Dienolone has an anabolic to androgenic ratio of 100/10 in comparison to methyl-testosterone, showing it to be fairly anabolic but not very androgenic. Dienolone does not convert to estrogen, but it does have some progestational activity which can increase the effects of estrogen.
Given this, these 2 products seem to appear to be on par with each other in terms of anabolic/androgenic effects.
Trenavar is easier due to the tablet format (Trenazone is transdermal).
However, sides seem to be a little less harsh with the Trenazone and the fear of the unknown with Trenavar scares me a bit.
IF these products were equally priced, which would you chose and why?