You imply that you are an advocate of the use of this product as an effective PCT by your adamant defense of the product. The use of novadex xt as a proper pct is not study proven by any means. You may like the product, but for the uneducated viewers of this thread, you are doing them a disservice by giving them reason to not go through the trouble of figuring out a proper PCT and just use some OTC crap. This could effect these individuals negatively and it is irresponsible of you to do so.
This IS an assumption, as is that the levels will magically return to normal after the discontinuation of use. Neither of which is proven as the study concludes with the test levels immediately following use. I bet if a poll were taken, most would agree with me that the subjects levels did not simply return to original levels. We will never know the real answer though, unless we Actually see blood results from say, a month after the study?
read what i wrote and address the points I made regarding your incorrect assertions. I have only been correcting your massively incorrect statements about this product. I have provided information, and bloods to show its legitimacy, yet repeatedly you've provided NO evidence to support your false claims that:
-nov xt is a prohormone
-nov xt is not an AI
-nov xt is suppressive/lowers test
-that once it boosts test, the levels will drop below that of pre-nov xt
-taken an arbitrary time period of a 1 month for a following test to reassess bloods
Now once again, here's my comments/corrections
''6, 17-keto-etiocholeve-3-ol tetrahydropyranol = non-androgenic anti-aromatase''
''3, 17-keto-etiochol-triene'' = ATD... which is an AI
''3', 5, 7-Trihydroxy-4'-Methoxyflavone = Hesperetin (which is a flavanoid)
NO prohormone is in the ingredients.
http://www.*************/forum/suppl...b-results.html
http://www.sizematters.com.au/supple...ood-tests.html
and of course there are the original clinical studies done with nov xt:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17460335
There are more bloods done on it, but you can find those.
studies to show that it boosts test, not suppress it. you have failed to show any study that nov xt lowers test
and you made the arbitrary assumption that because test has risen, it must then fall below starting levels. Please show me clinical and/or anecdotal evidence for this, as I have never heard anything along these lines for nov xt.
I dont work for gaspari, but it annoys me when grossly incorrect statements are made about legitimate products with literally no evidence to back them up.
So do you:
1: still think Nov Xt is a prohormone? and not an AI?
2: still believe it lowers test?
3: think the studies are fraudulent?
4: still think that there is a drop in baseline test upon cessation of nov xt?
And once again, I would not run Nov XT as a PCT. I never said I would!