DNP

**schwellington** · 01-24-2011 10:57 PM

I can get my hands on legit dnp- yes i know it can kill you via internal over heating- i also know you can loose a lb of fat a day on this.

would like 100 mgs 1 x daily be okay>?

im curious- not going to use it off the bat!

just looking for info is all

**MrBigPR** · 01-24-2011 11:05 PM

Pm me and I'll give u info

**swollen87** · 01-24-2011 11:20 PM

ive seen people run as high as 600/day

ecstasy can kill you from internal overheating too.... jus sayin

**schwellington** · 01-24-2011 11:23 PM

yeah i used to eat ex by the handfulls, im reading on it

i was thinking the last two weeks of cycle, because your not supposed to exert yourself heavily, and it uses calories 150% more effectively. So i figure the last 14 days i stay at 300 mgs and loose up to 10 lbs fat

**jbryand101b** · 01-24-2011 11:27 PM

I'm too chicken to try that stuff.

**swollen87** · 01-24-2011 11:30 PM

Originally Posted by jbryand101b

I'm too chicken to try that stuff.

x2....... well, maybe at a super low dose if it would still be effective

**schwellington** · 01-24-2011 11:53 PM

on second thought- my better judgement got me lol i will stick with t3/clen/ghrp-6

yeah im just not willing to risk melting for fat loss

**russy_russ** · 01-25-2011 12:01 AM

Originally Posted by schwellington

yeah i used to eat ex by the handfulls, im reading on it

i was thinking the last two weeks of cycle, because your not supposed to exert yourself heavily, and it uses calories 150% more effectively. So i figure the last 14 days i stay at 300 mgs and loose up to 10 lbs fat

You mean less efficiently?

**schwellington** · 01-25-2011 12:19 AM

no dnp jacks up the metabolic rate- to dangerous levels

**delsolrob** · 01-25-2011 12:41 AM

Originally Posted by jbryand101b

I'm too chicken to try that stuff.

No Joke, include me on the chicken wagon!

**swollen87** · 01-25-2011 12:45 AM

you scared lol

**Grambo** · 01-25-2011 01:46 AM

Originally Posted by russy_russ

You mean less efficiently?

Actually this is correct. It makes the process of ATP production less effecient leading to the body to increase metaboc capability to make up for the problem. In essence puts holes in mitochondrial walls in which protons leak out instead of going throughout ATP Synthase. I wouldn't use it in PCT personally.

** yes I've used it.

**phatmike0704** · 01-25-2011 10:39 AM

same here, just readin side effects about it is crazy

**panther77** · 01-25-2011 10:49 AM

Originally Posted by schwellington

on second thought- my better judgement got me lol i will stick with t3/clen/ghrp-6

yeah im just not willing to risk melting for fat loss

Do you think ghrp-6 is effective in a cut? I've used it to bulk because of how ****ing hungry I get on it, I have some left though and some clen and might do this going up to spring break

**Bigchourico** · 01-25-2011 11:01 AM

Originally Posted by jbryand101b

I'm too chicken to try that stuff.

Originally Posted by swollen87

x2....... well, maybe at a super low dose if it would still be effective

Originally Posted by schwellington

on second thought- my better judgement got me lol i will stick with t3/clen/ghrp-6

yeah im just not willing to risk melting for fat loss

You guys should talk to CrazyChemist he thinks this stuff is very safe. Me I'd rather try the many other options that work and are much safer. Who wants to worry about dying on their cut.

**hungryH** · 01-25-2011 11:13 AM

Originally Posted by MrBigPR

Pm me and I'll give u info

what was the point of this? its a ****ing forum

OP, I've used DNP several times Id be happy to answer any questions you have

It is not nearly as dangerous as it is made out to be IMO, but that also goes to say that obviously there are risks and you've got to be careful

**GeekPoop** · 01-25-2011 11:30 AM

Rip Schwell

or

I predict a cold water enema in the near future

**russy_russ** · 01-25-2011 12:27 PM

Originally Posted by schwellington

no dnp jacks up the metabolic rate- to dangerous levels

Humans are, on average, 15-25% efficient. Which means that only 15-25% of the calories consumed are used to perform work. The majority of the remainder is expelled as heat from metabolic reactions. I'm not going to go into oxidative metabolism, but DNP essentially reduces this efficiency and more heat is expelled. This would also be dependent on one's basal metabolic rate, amount consumed, and duration of ingestion.

**xFRACTION** · 01-25-2011 12:48 PM

Originally Posted by russy_russ

Humans are, on average, 15-25% efficient. Which means that only 15-25% of the calories consumed are used to perform work. The majority of the remainder is expelled as heat from metabolic reactions. I'm not going to go into oxidative metabolism, but DNP essentially reduces this efficiency and more heat is expelled. This would also be dependent on one's basal metabolic rate, amount consumed, and duration of ingestion.

If this is the case why not just consume less?

**DAdams91982** · 01-25-2011 01:03 PM

Originally Posted by russy_russ

Humans are, on average, 15-25% efficient. Which means that only 15-25% of the calories consumed are used to perform work. The majority of the remainder is expelled as heat from metabolic reactions. I'm not going to go into oxidative metabolism, but DNP essentially reduces this efficiency and more heat is expelled. This would also be dependent on one's basal metabolic rate, amount consumed, and duration of ingestion.

You have some info on this, or research? Regulating body temperature is considered work, so i am a bit confused on where those arbitrary numbers come from. I understand what you are saying, but seeing numbers on such a process raises flags.