DNP

Page 1 of 2 12 Last
  1. Registered User
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,814
    Answers
    0

    DNP


    I can get my hands on legit dnp- yes i know it can kill you via internal over heating- i also know you can loose a lb of fat a day on this.


    would like 100 mgs 1 x daily be okay>?


    im curious- not going to use it off the bat!


    just looking for info is all
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html

  2. NutraPlanet Rep
    Board Sponsor
    MrBigPR's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    7,619
    Answers
    0


    Pm me and I'll give u info
    Nutraplanet Representative
    PM me with any order questions and concerns
  3. Registered User
    swollen87's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  210 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,766
    Answers
    0


    ive seen people run as high as 600/day

    ecstasy can kill you from internal overheating too.... jus sayin
    Quote Originally Posted by alwaysgaining View Post
    I've also done fasting and doseing and felt grealt anabolicness , deffint hunger but I'm stronger than that keep full and vascular and strength gose up
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/177245-swollen87s-training-log.html
    •   
       

  4. Registered User
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,814
    Answers
    0


    yeah i used to eat ex by the handfulls, im reading on it

    i was thinking the last two weeks of cycle, because your not supposed to exert yourself heavily, and it uses calories 150% more effectively. So i figure the last 14 days i stay at 300 mgs and loose up to 10 lbs fat
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html
  5. Registered User
    jbryand101b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,601
    Answers
    0


    I'm too chicken to try that stuff.
  6. Registered User
    swollen87's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  210 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,766
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by jbryand101b View Post
    I'm too chicken to try that stuff.

    x2....... well, maybe at a super low dose if it would still be effective
    Quote Originally Posted by alwaysgaining View Post
    I've also done fasting and doseing and felt grealt anabolicness , deffint hunger but I'm stronger than that keep full and vascular and strength gose up
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/177245-swollen87s-training-log.html
  7. Registered User
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,814
    Answers
    0


    on second thought- my better judgement got me lol i will stick with t3/clen/ghrp-6


    yeah im just not willing to risk melting for fat loss
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html
  8. Registered User
    russy_russ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    911
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by schwellington View Post
    yeah i used to eat ex by the handfulls, im reading on it

    i was thinking the last two weeks of cycle, because your not supposed to exert yourself heavily, and it uses calories 150% more effectively. So i figure the last 14 days i stay at 300 mgs and loose up to 10 lbs fat
    You mean less efficiently?
  9. Registered User
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,814
    Answers
    0


    no dnp jacks up the metabolic rate- to dangerous levels
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html
  10. Registered User
    delsolrob's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Age
    34
    Posts
    3,131
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by jbryand101b View Post
    I'm too chicken to try that stuff.
    No Joke, include me on the chicken wagon!
  11. Registered User
    swollen87's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  210 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,766
    Answers
    0


    you scared lol
    Quote Originally Posted by alwaysgaining View Post
    I've also done fasting and doseing and felt grealt anabolicness , deffint hunger but I'm stronger than that keep full and vascular and strength gose up
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/177245-swollen87s-training-log.html
  12. Running with the Big Boys
    Board Sponsor
    Grambo's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  188 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    3,789
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by russy_russ View Post
    You mean less efficiently?
    Actually this is correct. It makes the process of ATP production less effecient leading to the body to increase metaboc capability to make up for the problem. In essence puts holes in mitochondrial walls in which protons leak out instead of going throughout ATP Synthase. I wouldn't use it in PCT personally.


    ** yes I've used it.
    Head Purus Labs Rep
    www.Puruslabs.net
  13. Registered User
    phatmike0704's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  184 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,508
    Answers
    0


    same here, just readin side effects about it is crazy
    if blow was characterized as a guy, consider me a homosexual :)
  14. Registered User
    panther77's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  197 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,330
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by schwellington View Post
    on second thought- my better judgement got me lol i will stick with t3/clen/ghrp-6


    yeah im just not willing to risk melting for fat loss
    Do you think ghrp-6 is effective in a cut? I've used it to bulk because of how ****ing hungry I get on it, I have some left though and some clen and might do this going up to spring break
  15. Registered User
    Bigchourico's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  251 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,506
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by jbryand101b View Post
    I'm too chicken to try that stuff.
    Quote Originally Posted by swollen87 View Post
    x2....... well, maybe at a super low dose if it would still be effective
    Quote Originally Posted by schwellington View Post
    on second thought- my better judgement got me lol i will stick with t3/clen/ghrp-6


    yeah im just not willing to risk melting for fat loss
    You guys should talk to CrazyChemist he thinks this stuff is very safe. Me I'd rather try the many other options that work and are much safer. Who wants to worry about dying on their cut.
  16. Registered User
    hungryH's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  220 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    450
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by MrBigPR View Post
    Pm me and I'll give u info
    what was the point of this? its a ****ing forum

    OP, I've used DNP several times Id be happy to answer any questions you have

    It is not nearly as dangerous as it is made out to be IMO, but that also goes to say that obviously there are risks and you've got to be careful
  17. Registered User
    GeekPoop's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  232 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Age
    27
    Posts
    5,268
    Answers
    0


    Rip Schwell

    or

    I predict a cold water enema in the near future
    Serious Nutrition Solutions
  18. Registered User
    russy_russ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    911
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by schwellington View Post
    no dnp jacks up the metabolic rate- to dangerous levels
    Humans are, on average, 15-25% efficient. Which means that only 15-25% of the calories consumed are used to perform work. The majority of the remainder is expelled as heat from metabolic reactions. I'm not going to go into oxidative metabolism, but DNP essentially reduces this efficiency and more heat is expelled. This would also be dependent on one's basal metabolic rate, amount consumed, and duration of ingestion.
  19. Registered User
    xFRACTION's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  199 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    959
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by russy_russ View Post
    Humans are, on average, 15-25% efficient. Which means that only 15-25% of the calories consumed are used to perform work. The majority of the remainder is expelled as heat from metabolic reactions. I'm not going to go into oxidative metabolism, but DNP essentially reduces this efficiency and more heat is expelled. This would also be dependent on one's basal metabolic rate, amount consumed, and duration of ingestion.
    If this is the case why not just consume less?
  20. Running with the Big Boys
    Board Sponsor
    DAdams91982's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Age
    31
    Posts
    7,397
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by russy_russ View Post
    Humans are, on average, 15-25% efficient. Which means that only 15-25% of the calories consumed are used to perform work. The majority of the remainder is expelled as heat from metabolic reactions. I'm not going to go into oxidative metabolism, but DNP essentially reduces this efficiency and more heat is expelled. This would also be dependent on one's basal metabolic rate, amount consumed, and duration of ingestion.
    You have some info on this, or research? Regulating body temperature is considered work, so i am a bit confused on where those arbitrary numbers come from. I understand what you are saying, but seeing numbers on such a process raises flags.
    The Historic PES Legend
  21. Registered User
    MAxximal's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Age
    37
    Posts
    6,903
    Answers
    0


    bumpy
    SNS Online Representative
    Maxximal @ seriousnutritionsolutions.com

    Got Glycophase ...?


  22. Registered User
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,814
    Answers
    0


    DNP raises metabolic rate

    metabolism- the rate at which nutrients are broken down and used for energy


    russ what your stating make no sense in this context- at least not to me


    as for ghrp-6 being effective on a cut- it forces the body to release a surge of HGH so yes, it is effective. Ive used it before when trying to cut bf- so i get hungry, i wait an hour eat, and the hunger is gone no biggie


    DNP is up in the air atm

    clen and a LOW dose t3 on recomp is still a go for certain
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html
  23. Registered User
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,814
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by Grambo View Post
    Actually this is correct. It makes the process of ATP production less effecient leading to the body to increase metaboc capability to make up for the problem. In essence puts holes in mitochondrial walls in which protons leak out instead of going throughout ATP Synthase. I wouldn't use it in PCT personally.


    ** yes I've used it.
    so wait, it does crank up metabolic rate just through making the body use calories less efficiently?

    maybe i mis read i will have to double check
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html
  24. Registered User
    2k1s's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,149
    Answers
    0


    Schwell found a compound he can buy but won't take... I thought this day would never come. Tears of JOY
    Comic Sans makes me feel gangsta
  25. Registered User
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,814
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by 2k1s View Post
    Schwell found a compound he can buy but won't take... I thought this day would never come. Tears of JOY
    lol


    ass
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html
  26. Registered User
    SamBoz19's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  285 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Age
    30
    Posts
    2,696
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by schwellington View Post
    no dnp jacks up the metabolic rate- to dangerous levels
    That is an understatement. DNP is stuff no one should play around with IMO. The stuff is used for explosives (when you hear that common sense takes over...why the F*ck would I mess with this stuff then?). When they say it will bake you inside out that isn't a load of BS to scare you...it is the truth. Additionally, there are a whole host of other side effects that make it something that is not worth the risk.

    Cheers!

    -Sean-

    Primordial Performance
    "Never trust a b*tch because b*tches be crazy, now get out there and go crush some P***Y!" - Jerry Stiller.
  27. Registered User
    russy_russ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    911
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by DAdams91982 View Post
    You have some info on this, or research? Regulating body temperature is considered work, so i am a bit confused on where those arbitrary numbers come from. I understand what you are saying, but seeing numbers on such a process raises flags.
    Efficiency defined as [(kcal required to perform work / kcal expended) * 100]
    Gross, Net, Mechanical, and Delta Efficiencies are related to scientific literature. The higher the intensity, the less efficient we become. Which means it requires humans to oxidize more substrates to perform a given amount of work thereby producing more heat. This is related to a rise in core temperature during exercise. Kcal is a unit measuring an amount of energy, similar to Joules. Thermal regulation is not considered work. Work is defined as [force * displacement].
  28. Registered User
    russy_russ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    911
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by schwellington View Post
    DNP raises metabolic rate

    metabolism- the rate at which nutrients are broken down and used for energy


    russ what your stating make no sense in this context- at least not to me
    DNP is a metabolic poison. In short, it uncouples oxidative phosphorylation requiring more substrates to be converted to ATP since oxidative metabolism is hindered.

    Actually, it makes perfect sense.
  29. Running with the Big Boys
    Board Sponsor
    DAdams91982's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Age
    31
    Posts
    7,397
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by russy_russ View Post
    Efficiency defined as [(kcal required to perform work / kcal expended) * 100]
    Gross, Net, Mechanical, and Delta Efficiencies are related to scientific literature. The higher the intensity, the less efficient we become. Which means it requires humans to oxidize more substrates to perform a given amount of work thereby producing more heat. This is related to a rise in core temperature during exercise. Kcal is a unit measuring an amount of energy, similar to Joules. Thermal regulation is not considered work. Work is defined as [force * displacement].
    Then I believe your theory is a bit skewed. If one doesn't take in basic physiological functions as an imperative process for living conditions and only regarding physical labor as work, then we are at an impasse of logic.

    Because only 15 -25% of cals goes to labor does not make the body inefficient, in fact I believe it makes the body even more efficient since it can do some of the work people perform with such little fuel.
    The Historic PES Legend
  30. Registered User
    russy_russ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    911
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by DAdams91982 View Post
    Then I believe your theory is a bit skewed. If one doesn't take in basic physiological functions as an imperative process for living conditions and only regarding physical labor as work, then we are at an impasse of logic.

    Because only 15 -25% of cals goes to labor does not make the body inefficient, in fact I believe it makes the body even more efficient since it can do some of the work people perform with such little fuel.
    My definition is not skewed, it's your comprehension which is skewed. You think I don't know the physiological functions required to support life? I'm an exercise physiologist, are you? Look up the physics definition of work. To perform work, one must displace a given force (object, etc.) which requires energy to do. For gross efficiency, one relates the kinetic energy required to displace said object relative to the amount of energy consumed by the body to output that kinetic energy.

    It's not work being done with little fuel. The 15-25% is the amount of TOTAL CONSUMED KCAL which goes to perform mechanical work. If we were more efficient then a higher percent of the KCAL CONSUMED would go to performing mechanical work.
  31. Running with the Big Boys
    Board Sponsor
    DAdams91982's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Age
    31
    Posts
    7,397
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by russy_russ View Post
    My definition is not skewed, it's your comprehension which is skewed. You think I don't know the physiological functions required to support life? I'm an exercise physiologist, are you? Look up the physics definition of work. To perform work, one must displace a given force (object, etc.) which requires energy to do. For gross efficiency, one relates the kinetic energy required to displace said object relative to the amount of energy consumed by the body to output that kinetic energy.

    It's not work being done with little fuel. The 15-25% is the amount of TOTAL CONSUMED KCAL which goes to perform mechanical work. If we were more efficient then a higher percent of the KCAL CONSUMED would go to performing mechanical work.
    This is the internet my friend, I am a biomechanical engineer developing replacement limbs grown on iguana lizards for dismembered trumpet players.

    You can spare me your condescending little tone there russy russ. It is the human body being able to perform the work they perform but yet still only using a small percentage of incoming cals to accomplish said work. Thus, the ability to do such work with a minimal amount of fuel means they are super efficient. My contention is that you undervalue the biological processes that support life. But then again you claim you are an exercise physiologist, so I would expect no less... like a orthopedic surgeon saying your bones are most important to a cardiologist.
    The Historic PES Legend
  32. NutraPlanet Rep
    Board Sponsor
    MrBigPR's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    7,619
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by hungryH View Post
    what was the point of this? its a ****ing forum

    OP, I've used DNP several times Id be happy to answer any questions you have

    It is not nearly as dangerous as it is made out to be IMO, but that also goes to say that obviously there are risks and you've got to be careful
    Lulz
    Nutraplanet Representative
    PM me with any order questions and concerns
  33. NutraPlanet Rep
    Board Sponsor
    MrBigPR's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    7,619
    Answers
    0


    Schwell stay away from this until you are off anabolics.
    Nutraplanet Representative
    PM me with any order questions and concerns
  34. Registered User
    MAxximal's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Age
    37
    Posts
    6,903
    Answers
    0
    SNS Online Representative
    Maxximal @ seriousnutritionsolutions.com

    Got Glycophase ...?


  35. Registered User
    2k1s's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,149
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by MrBigPR View Post
    Schwell stay away from this until you are off anabolics.
    real men snort DNP
    Comic Sans makes me feel gangsta
  36. Registered User
    DBdude's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  211 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    278
    Answers
    0


    DNP will make you a temporary diabetic by blunting the effects of insulin allowing further lipolysis. I have done a **** load or research about this stuff and for the well educated user it is a great weightloss aide. Just be sure to take precautions with this and take it slow. I wouldn't take it with aas/ds/ph because it is muscle sparing. Protein can not be used to replenish ATP. It works through a process uncoupling oxidative phosphorylation which means the DNP molecule carries protons through the mitochondrial membrane, across the proton gradient and expels the protons as heat instead of going through ATP synthase. This makes for a great deficit in cellular ATP that requires accelerated oxidation to help compensate. So instead of C6H12O6+ 602= 6H2O + 6CO2 + 38ATP with DNP it would look like this C6H12O6+ 602= 6H2O + 6CO2 + 24ATP

    Simply put, your body has to burn more fuel to get the same amount of energy
    To get un-naturally big, you gotta do un-natural things
  37. Registered User
    biggfly's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  228 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Age
    42
    Posts
    327
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by DBdude View Post
    DNP will make you a temporary diabetic by blunting the effects of insulin allowing further lipolysis. I have done a **** load or research about this stuff and for the well educated user it is a great weightloss aide. Just be sure to take precautions with this and take it slow. I wouldn't take it with aas/ds/ph because it is muscle sparing. Protein can not be used to replenish ATP. It works through a process uncoupling oxidative phosphorylation which means the DNP molecule carries protons through the mitochondrial membrane, across the proton gradient and expels the protons as heat instead of going through ATP synthase. This makes for a great deficit in cellular ATP that requires accelerated oxidation to help compensate. So instead of C6H12O6+ 602= 6H2O + 6CO2 + 38ATP with DNP it would look like this C6H12O6+ 602= 6H2O + 6CO2 + 24ATP

    Simply put, your body has to burn more fuel to get the same amount of energy
    Now thats breaking it down to the nitty gritty...good post
  38. Running with the Big Boys
    Board Sponsor
    Grambo's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  188 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    3,789
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by schwellington View Post
    so wait, it does crank up metabolic rate just through making the body use calories less efficiently?

    maybe i mis read i will have to double check
    Bingo.

    If you can find an article or diagram on uncouplers it may explain it better but honestly the way I wrote it and the above post with the ATP numbers (though theoretical) are how it works.
    Head Purus Labs Rep
    www.Puruslabs.net
  39. Registered User
    kyran's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    167
    Answers
    0


    I have had some on hand for a while now, I find a quick enough loss in fat doing the clen/T3 cardio route while on AAS though so I don't know if I will need it. I plan on competing later this year so if I have tried anything and everything else and can not get to the bf% I desire I then, MIGHT try it. haha
  40. Registered User
    russy_russ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    911
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by DAdams91982 View Post
    This is the internet my friend, I am a biomechanical engineer developing replacement limbs grown on iguana lizards for dismembered trumpet players.

    You can spare me your condescending little tone there russy russ. It is the human body being able to perform the work they perform but yet still only using a small percentage of incoming cals to accomplish said work. Thus, the ability to do such work with a minimal amount of fuel means they are super efficient. My contention is that you undervalue the biological processes that support life. But then again you claim you are an exercise physiologist, so I would expect no less... like a orthopedic surgeon saying your bones are most important to a cardiologist.
    Well it's certainly evident you know nothing about human physiology. Which explains by your comments that you have no idea about the scope of exercise physiology. I would suggest you reread up on biology since you have it backwards. It's not a minimal amount of fuel to do work. It's the opposite. For example, 1kcal output would require 4kcal input (hypothetical values).
  •   

      
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in