DNP

[MAxximal]

bumpy

[schwellington]

DNP raises metabolic rate

metabolism- the rate at which nutrients are broken down and used for energy


russ what your stating make no sense in this context- at least not to me


as for ghrp-6 being effective on a cut- it forces the body to release a surge of HGH so yes, it is effective. Ive used it before when trying to cut bf- so i get hungry, i wait an hour eat, and the hunger is gone no biggie


DNP is up in the air atm

clen and a LOW dose t3 on recomp is still a go for certain

[schwellington]

Actually this is correct. It makes the process of ATP production less effecient leading to the body to increase metaboc capability to make up for the problem. In essence puts holes in mitochondrial walls in which protons leak out instead of going throughout ATP Synthase. I wouldn't use it in PCT personally.


** yes I've used it.

so wait, it does crank up metabolic rate just through making the body use calories less efficiently?

maybe i mis read i will have to double check

[2k1s]

Schwell found a compound he can buy but won't take... I thought this day would never come. Tears of JOY

[schwellington]

Schwell found a compound he can buy but won't take... I thought this day would never come. Tears of JOY

lol


ass

[SamBoz19]

no dnp jacks up the metabolic rate- to dangerous levels

That is an understatement. DNP is stuff no one should play around with IMO. The stuff is used for explosives (when you hear that common sense takes over...why the F*ck would I mess with this stuff then?). When they say it will bake you inside out that isn't a load of BS to scare you...it is the truth. Additionally, there are a whole host of other side effects that make it something that is not worth the risk.

Cheers!

-Sean-

Primordial Performance

[russy_russ]

You have some info on this, or research? Regulating body temperature is considered work, so i am a bit confused on where those arbitrary numbers come from. I understand what you are saying, but seeing numbers on such a process raises flags.

Efficiency defined as [(kcal required to perform work / kcal expended) * 100]
Gross, Net, Mechanical, and Delta Efficiencies are related to scientific literature. The higher the intensity, the less efficient we become. Which means it requires humans to oxidize more substrates to perform a given amount of work thereby producing more heat. This is related to a rise in core temperature during exercise. Kcal is a unit measuring an amount of energy, similar to Joules. Thermal regulation is not considered work. Work is defined as [force * displacement].

[russy_russ]

DNP raises metabolic rate

metabolism- the rate at which nutrients are broken down and used for energy


russ what your stating make no sense in this context- at least not to me

DNP is a metabolic poison. In short, it uncouples oxidative phosphorylation requiring more substrates to be converted to ATP since oxidative metabolism is hindered.

Actually, it makes perfect sense.

[DAdams91982]

Efficiency defined as [(kcal required to perform work / kcal expended) * 100]
Gross, Net, Mechanical, and Delta Efficiencies are related to scientific literature. The higher the intensity, the less efficient we become. Which means it requires humans to oxidize more substrates to perform a given amount of work thereby producing more heat. This is related to a rise in core temperature during exercise. Kcal is a unit measuring an amount of energy, similar to Joules. Thermal regulation is not considered work. Work is defined as [force * displacement].

Then I believe your theory is a bit skewed. If one doesn't take in basic physiological functions as an imperative process for living conditions and only regarding physical labor as work, then we are at an impasse of logic.

Because only 15 -25% of cals goes to labor does not make the body inefficient, in fact I believe it makes the body even more efficient since it can do some of the work people perform with such little fuel.

[russy_russ]

Then I believe your theory is a bit skewed. If one doesn't take in basic physiological functions as an imperative process for living conditions and only regarding physical labor as work, then we are at an impasse of logic.

Because only 15 -25% of cals goes to labor does not make the body inefficient, in fact I believe it makes the body even more efficient since it can do some of the work people perform with such little fuel.

My definition is not skewed, it's your comprehension which is skewed. You think I don't know the physiological functions required to support life? I'm an exercise physiologist, are you? Look up the physics definition of work. To perform work, one must displace a given force (object, etc.) which requires energy to do. For gross efficiency, one relates the kinetic energy required to displace said object relative to the amount of energy consumed by the body to output that kinetic energy.

It's not work being done with little fuel. The 15-25% is the amount of TOTAL CONSUMED KCAL which goes to perform mechanical work. If we were more efficient then a higher percent of the KCAL CONSUMED would go to performing mechanical work.

[DAdams91982]

My definition is not skewed, it's your comprehension which is skewed. You think I don't know the physiological functions required to support life? I'm an exercise physiologist, are you? Look up the physics definition of work. To perform work, one must displace a given force (object, etc.) which requires energy to do. For gross efficiency, one relates the kinetic energy required to displace said object relative to the amount of energy consumed by the body to output that kinetic energy.

It's not work being done with little fuel. The 15-25% is the amount of TOTAL CONSUMED KCAL which goes to perform mechanical work. If we were more efficient then a higher percent of the KCAL CONSUMED would go to performing mechanical work.

This is the internet my friend, I am a biomechanical engineer developing replacement limbs grown on iguana lizards for dismembered trumpet players.

You can spare me your condescending little tone there russy russ. It is the human body being able to perform the work they perform but yet still only using a small percentage of incoming cals to accomplish said work. Thus, the ability to do such work with a minimal amount of fuel means they are super efficient. My contention is that you undervalue the biological processes that support life. But then again you claim you are an exercise physiologist, so I would expect no less... like a orthopedic surgeon saying your bones are most important to a cardiologist.

[MrBigPR]

what was the point of this? its a ****ing forum

OP, I've used DNP several times Id be happy to answer any questions you have

It is not nearly as dangerous as it is made out to be IMO, but that also goes to say that obviously there are risks and you've got to be careful

Lulz

[MrBigPR]

Schwell stay away from this until you are off anabolics.

[MAxximal]

2,4 dinitrophenol

[2k1s]

Schwell stay away from this until you are off anabolics.

real men snort DNP

[DBdude]

DNP will make you a temporary diabetic by blunting the effects of insulin allowing further lipolysis. I have done a **** load or research about this stuff and for the well educated user it is a great weightloss aide. Just be sure to take precautions with this and take it slow. I wouldn't take it with aas/ds/ph because it is muscle sparing. Protein can not be used to replenish ATP. It works through a process uncoupling oxidative phosphorylation which means the DNP molecule carries protons through the mitochondrial membrane, across the proton gradient and expels the protons as heat instead of going through ATP synthase. This makes for a great deficit in cellular ATP that requires accelerated oxidation to help compensate. So instead of C6H12O6+ 602= 6H2O + 6CO2 + 38ATP with DNP it would look like this C6H12O6+ 602= 6H2O + 6CO2 + 24ATP

Simply put, your body has to burn more fuel to get the same amount of energy

[biggfly]

DNP will make you a temporary diabetic by blunting the effects of insulin allowing further lipolysis. I have done a **** load or research about this stuff and for the well educated user it is a great weightloss aide. Just be sure to take precautions with this and take it slow. I wouldn't take it with aas/ds/ph because it is muscle sparing. Protein can not be used to replenish ATP. It works through a process uncoupling oxidative phosphorylation which means the DNP molecule carries protons through the mitochondrial membrane, across the proton gradient and expels the protons as heat instead of going through ATP synthase. This makes for a great deficit in cellular ATP that requires accelerated oxidation to help compensate. So instead of C6H12O6+ 602= 6H2O + 6CO2 + 38ATP with DNP it would look like this C6H12O6+ 602= 6H2O + 6CO2 + 24ATP

Simply put, your body has to burn more fuel to get the same amount of energy

Now thats breaking it down to the nitty gritty...good post

[Grambo]

so wait, it does crank up metabolic rate just through making the body use calories less efficiently?

maybe i mis read i will have to double check

Bingo.

If you can find an article or diagram on uncouplers it may explain it better but honestly the way I wrote it and the above post with the ATP numbers (though theoretical) are how it works.

[kyran]

I have had some on hand for a while now, I find a quick enough loss in fat doing the clen/T3 cardio route while on AAS though so I don't know if I will need it. I plan on competing later this year so if I have tried anything and everything else and can not get to the bf% I desire I then, MIGHT try it. haha

[russy_russ]

This is the internet my friend, I am a biomechanical engineer developing replacement limbs grown on iguana lizards for dismembered trumpet players.

You can spare me your condescending little tone there russy russ. It is the human body being able to perform the work they perform but yet still only using a small percentage of incoming cals to accomplish said work. Thus, the ability to do such work with a minimal amount of fuel means they are super efficient. My contention is that you undervalue the biological processes that support life. But then again you claim you are an exercise physiologist, so I would expect no less... like a orthopedic surgeon saying your bones are most important to a cardiologist.

Well it's certainly evident you know nothing about human physiology. Which explains by your comments that you have no idea about the scope of exercise physiology. I would suggest you reread up on biology since you have it backwards. It's not a minimal amount of fuel to do work. It's the opposite. For example, 1kcal output would require 4kcal input (hypothetical values).