- 09-06-2010, 09:59 PM
doing alot of research and probably starting my first cycle soon
just reading alot about how taking AAS or PH under age 21 can stunt growth,
yet I hear about and see guys who started cycles as young as 16 and turned out fine... alot of confusion
bigger faster strong- Christian Boeving admit to taking steroids at 16 and he's 6'1"? Arnold, also started at 16 (if not earlier)...6'2"
I understand stunted growth wouldn't be the only side, but if they're wrong about this then who's to say they're not wrong about everything else too?!?
not tryin to start a war here, just a thought
- 09-06-2010, 10:07 PM
Are you 16? lol
Anyways, the possibility for a youngsters developing hormonal system getting permanently damaged is high if you take steroids at that young of age.
Sure, those old Pro BBs turned out ok, but does everyone?
Not sure because no studies have been done.
If you care about what your testosterone levels will be like when you are over 25, you wont cycle at 15, 16, 17 or 18.. you get where I am going..
Most guys under 21 have crazy hormonal fluctations as it is, causing them to do stupid stuff that teens do, like drink, start fights, commit suicide etc.. You add in extra hormones and bam, that will cause you to do some crazy sh!t..
I have seen plenty of 15, 16, 17 YOs on roids in my gym.. They get on, get off and shrink, then get on again and again and again.. They start fights, get their arses kicked etc..
Please dont do steroids if your 16, unless you have the genetics and build and was given a prophecy that you would win mr. universe lol...
- 09-06-2010, 10:12 PM
09-06-2010, 10:14 PM
09-06-2010, 10:15 PM
09-06-2010, 10:16 PM
09-06-2010, 10:17 PM
09-06-2010, 10:18 PM
09-06-2010, 10:21 PM
09-06-2010, 11:01 PM
look at how bone grows for starters. cartidlge calcifies n turns to bone...
Serious Nutrition Solutions
09-07-2010, 02:56 AM
like i said in my original post I'm not trying to start a war here
so it stunts growth in some ppl but not others? so in all actuality there's not really anyway to predict who it will effect, or what it will effect, so therefore just don't take it your under 21
09-07-2010, 03:01 AM
My friend started at 16. No he didn't turn out fine.
It is almost impossible for him to lose fat naturally and his test level is about 81.
I don't know anyone here that started at 16 and is perfectly normal when not on.
09-07-2010, 09:13 AM
09-07-2010, 09:52 AM
they gave children with delayed puberty, or stunted growth, oral aas like methandrostenediol, oxandrolone.
that was before better treatment options came available.
using aas at 18,19,20,21 is stupid. I had my best non steroid gains at those ages, and If I knew then what I know now, im sure they could of been more.
09-07-2010, 09:12 PM
09-07-2010, 09:37 PM
The reason there are some "taller" guys who reportedly took steroids very young is that they were likely already relatively tall when they started. I had reached my full adult height by 16 years old, but that doesn't mean taking steroids that young would have been a good idea.
09-07-2010, 09:49 PM
Similar Forum Threads
- By MrBrightside in forum SupplementsReplies: 6Last Post: 11-01-2008, 07:24 PM
- By TheeBC in forum AnabolicsReplies: 4Last Post: 03-23-2008, 08:22 PM
- By jayisreal in forum SupplementsReplies: 0Last Post: 02-20-2008, 11:39 PM
- By Jsouth in forum General ChatReplies: 5Last Post: 12-18-2006, 02:34 PM