Blood work!

  1. New Member
    xxl610's Avatar
    Stats
    6'10"  298 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    63
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    7.5%

    Blood work!


    hey im new to this posting thing so if i say something wrong in here please cut me some slack. i dont think i am. so i ran a cycle of deca and test E with a dbol kicker for 14 weeks that ended in Jan. i happened to be moving at the end of my cycle and ran low on funds and didnt PCT. stupid i know . its been six months and my libido and my workouts are still laging to say the least. ive been taking that i force reversitol for about a month and has helped a little bit but things still dont feel right. i was thinking of getting some hcg to try and get my natural test going again. i figure i should do some blood work to figure out exactly whats going on before i just start pumping more stuff in me. i am new to So Cal (north county SD) and dont have medical insurance or anything like that. if any one has advice on where to get blood work done for a reasonable price or if im even aproaching this the right way id be VERY appreciative! Thanks guys.

  2. Professional Member
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,813
    Rep Power
    8932
    Level
    51
    Lv. Percent
    89.39%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    you figure your going to get blood work before you start pumping more things into you?

    1. Have your pct on hand before you start your cycle
    2. Research the steroids you are going to run
    3. Stay off steroids until you know for a fact your body is in homeostasis and has been for some time
    4. Get a SERM I do not think an OTC product is going to do jack **** for the cycle you ran
    5. I dont know **** about hcg maybe someone can help you out
    6. Ending my rant now
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html
  3. Banned
    gamer2be08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,988
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    54
    Lv. Percent
    17.08%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    First of all, STUPID!!! WTF...

    No HCG.

    This is what I would do in your situation, but I am not a Dr., I just like to self medicate myself:

    clomid:50/50/50/50/25/25
    Tan, get in a lot of saturated fats, take your multi and fish oil daily. Get 8 hours of sleep each night. 4 weeks into clomid, start a good natural test booster and ZMA.. Then Pray!
    All of the above are effective at raising testosterone levels, lets hope you aren't f ucked for good.
    •   
       

  4. New Member
    xxl610's Avatar
    Stats
    6'10"  298 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    63
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    7.5%

    haha thanks guys. knew it was a bad move then, definitly know it was a bad move now. will take the advice. still would like to get my blood work done. curious as to why you say no to the hcg. i thought that stuff would be perfect for getting my boys going again. ive used clomid before and it works good, just didnt know if it would be the best thing for how long ive been low.
  5. Professional Member
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,813
    Rep Power
    8932
    Level
    51
    Lv. Percent
    89.39%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    hcg is usefull while on cycle.....not in pct
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html
  6. Banned
    gamer2be08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,988
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    54
    Lv. Percent
    17.08%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by xxl610 View Post
    haha thanks guys. knew it was a bad move then, definitly know it was a bad move now. will take the advice. still would like to get my blood work done. curious as to why you say no to the hcg. i thought that stuff would be perfect for getting my boys going again. ive used clomid before and it works good, just didnt know if it would be the best thing for how long ive been low.
    HCG is synthetic LH thus it will suppress your pituitary LH output! Clomid will raise LH output, thus stimulating the testes..
  7. New Member
    xxl610's Avatar
    Stats
    6'10"  298 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    63
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    7.5%

    got ya. will do.
  8. Banned
    HumpTheCook's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  BIG lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,103
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    25
    Lv. Percent
    54.98%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    dont over stress bro... you def are not f*cked for good... years ago no one even knew what pct was... granted its pretty stupid not to pct now that we know better, chances are after one cycle without a pct your problems should not be that hard to fix. take gamers adive and hit the clomid hard. you'll be a new man in no time!
  9. New Member
    MikeGfilms's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  186 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Age
    25
    Posts
    457
    Rep Power
    300
    Level
    17
    Lv. Percent
    76.88%

    Quote Originally Posted by gamer2be08 View Post
    First of all, STUPID!!! WTF...

    No HCG.

    This is what I would do in your situation, but I am not a Dr., I just like to self medicate myself:

    clomid:50/50/50/50/25/25
    Tan, get in a lot of saturated fats, take your multi and fish oil daily. Get 8 hours of sleep each night. 4 weeks into clomid, start a good natural test booster and ZMA.. Then Pray!
    All of the above are effective at raising testosterone levels, lets hope you aren't f ucked for good.
    How does tanning and eating sat. fats raise test levels?
  10. New Member
    xxl610's Avatar
    Stats
    6'10"  298 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    63
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    7.5%

    Kinda wondering that too? Anyone have any info on getting a resonable blood test?
  11. New Member
    andro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    93
    Rep Power
    113
    Level
    8
    Lv. Percent
    87.25%

    im guessing he means that sat.fats will increase test through cholesterol. which is actually true. tanning, how does this increase test? increase in vitamin d affect test?
  12. New Member
    Nothingman's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  165 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Age
    39
    Posts
    283
    Rep Power
    198
    Level
    14
    Lv. Percent
    34.69%

    Quote Originally Posted by gamer2be08 View Post
    This is what I would do in your situation, but I am not a Dr., I just like to self medicate myself.
    lol!!! It is fun isnt it?
  13. Senior Member
    qwerty33's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  184 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,984
    Rep Power
    1078
    Level
    33
    Lv. Percent
    23.07%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    clomi and sustain alpha m8. and talk to your doc
  14. New Member
    xxl610's Avatar
    Stats
    6'10"  298 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    63
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    7.5%

    Sounds good. In reality though probably not going to the doc. Don't have insurance and I don't want to spend the money on a visit. Thanks though, sounds like sound advice
  15. New Member
    Nothingman's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  165 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Age
    39
    Posts
    283
    Rep Power
    198
    Level
    14
    Lv. Percent
    34.69%

    Quote Originally Posted by xxl610 View Post
    Sounds good. In reality though probably not going to the doc. Don't have insurance and I don't want to spend the money on a visit. Thanks though, sounds like sound advice
    A doc visit is like 80 man. The blood work I'm not sure. I would go to the doc. Don't even have to tell em what you did just tell em how you feel and get tests.

    I do have an interesting question though. What exactly can the doctor do? Will a doctor prescribe something to help bring test back?

    Still I would get check out.
  16. New Member
    xxl610's Avatar
    Stats
    6'10"  298 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    63
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    7.5%

    I doubt he's going to tell me anything ground breaking. What could he prescribe me that all these guys don't know about. I pretty sure if there was some thing that worked good u would hear about it here.
  17. Elite Member
    Zero V's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  163 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Age
    28
    Posts
    6,286
    Rep Power
    7015
    Level
    52
    Lv. Percent
    27.52%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by xxl610 View Post
    I doubt he's going to tell me anything ground breaking. What could he prescribe me that all these guys don't know about. I pretty sure if there was some thing that worked good u would hear about it here.
    Wrong, he can tell you EVERYthing you cant find yourself, and these guys CANT tell you.....and that is exactly WTF is going on in your body(through a blood test of course).

    I duno man, I enjoy risking my body to supplements, and eventually AAS, but I plan to do it properly when I do, if I dont have the money I wont be doing it(I almost did before, ran low on cash, never did) Buy your PCT before you buy the cycle,
  18. Advanced Member
    Chubbinmuffin's Avatar
    Stats
    5'6"  °¿° lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    696
    Rep Power
    430
    Level
    21
    Lv. Percent
    5.04%

    Quote Originally Posted by andro View Post
    im guessing he means that sat.fats will increase test through cholesterol. which is actually true. tanning, how does this increase test? increase in vitamin d affect test?
    I've heard vitamin D increases test.
  19. Elite Member
    Zero V's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  163 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Age
    28
    Posts
    6,286
    Rep Power
    7015
    Level
    52
    Lv. Percent
    27.52%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by Chubbinmuffin View Post
    I've heard vitamin D increases test.
    D3, was just reading an article on it.
  20. New Member
    xxl610's Avatar
    Stats
    6'10"  298 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    63
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    7.5%

    Never had run a cycle without pct in the past. This time I had some unforseen things happen that prevented me from buying it. Tough luck I guess. I orderd the cloid last night. Thanks for the posts.
  21. New Member
    xxl610's Avatar
    Stats
    6'10"  298 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    63
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    7.5%

    just thought id throw this in the mix if anyone had input on it.

    found it at:
    primordialperformance.com/discussion/educational-articles/357-clomid-nolvadex-dark-side.html#post2035[/url]

    Clomid & Nolvadex - The Dark Side

    By Eric M. Potratz (Email)

    Eric M. Potratz has developed his education in the field of endocrinology and performance enhancement through years of research, counseling, and real world experience. Over the past five years he has been a private consultant for hundreds of athletes and bodybuilders alike, and is the founder & president of Primordial Performance.



    Preface - Over the past 15 years, the use of Clomid and Nolvadex, as Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) has become a staple in the HRT and bodybuilding communities.

    The popularity of these drugs stems from the popular advice to use these drugs for everything from testosterone recovery, bloat reduction, to gyno prevention. In many communities SERMs have become akin to vitamins -- vitamins that can do no wrong and provide seemingly endless benefits.

    This article is not intended to examine the proper use or possible applications of Clomid or Nolvadex. Instead, we will be exploring the historical development of these drugs, the short-term side-effects and long-term consequences.

    As I will illustrate, these drugs are true danger to men’s health.

    Synthetic estrogens, the beginning -

    It was the 1930’s and there was a new age of hormone-dependant pathologies on the rise. Scientists were eager to determine the structural requirements of estrogen for new drug design.

    In 1937 Sir Charles Dodd of the Middlesex Hospital of London found estrogenic activity in a molecule with two benzene rings linked together via a short carbon chain (eg, diphenylethane). (1) Soon thereafter, a synthetic, non-steroidal estrogen known as diethylstilboestrol (DES) was created from this basic molecular backbone. (1) By 1941, DES was an FDA approved drug, and by the 1950’s, DES gained widespread popularity as the drug of choice for menopausal symptoms, cancer treatment, and prevention of miscarriages. (2)

    DES sparked the interest of ambitious drug manufactures that saw this synthetic molecule as a potential “molecular backbone” which could be tailored for estrogenic activity, and patented for maximum profit.

    Within months, a research group from the University of Edinburgh found that the addition of a benzene ring to the original diphenylethane structure created an somewhat of an anti-estrogen known as triphenylethylene. (1) Although it had very weak estrogenic activity, it was called an anti-estrogen because it competed with the body’s more powerful estradiol for the ER receptors.

    Although the complex estrogenic action of triphenylethylene was not fully understood, it was considered the perfect molecular platform for future drug development because of its high oral bioavailability and extended half-life due to its lipophilicity (fat solubility). As it was later discovered, the estrogenic action could be manipulated with structural modifications for more specific agonist/antagonist actions. (3) Despite the lack of understanding for its full physiological effects, triphenylethylene would become the molecular backbone for generations of SERM’s to come.

    By the early 1940’s, the world’s largest chemical manufacturers, including Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI), got word of the triphenylethylene development, and seized the opportunity to expand this new class of compounds. By the 1950’s, the synthesis of new triphenylethylene based molecules had began picking up momentum, as the first FDA approved SERM’s started appearing on the market.

    One of the first was Triparanol, which was sold as a cholesterol lowering SERM, until it was eventually pulled from the market in the 1950’s for causing cataracts in patients. (7) Later, Ethamoxytriphetol (MER-25) was discovered and found to be a reliable contraceptive and anti-cancer agent in rats, but failed in humans due to the drug’s severe toxicity and stimulation of “acute psychotic episodes”. (6)

    Despite these early warning signs, development continued.

    Among one of the newer SERM’s to appear in the late 1950’s, was a mixture of two stereoisomers -- zuclomiphene and enclomiphene -- both having unique estrogenic and anti-estrogen actions. This mixture was collectively called clomiphene, and later marketed as Clomid.

    Then, in 1962, ICI synthesized ICI-46474, another mixture of a trans and cis isomers with mixed estrogenic and anti-estrogenic activity. (7) Ultimately, the trans isomer was found to be the predominate anti-estrogen, which was isolated and eventually named tamoxifen, and later marketed as Nolvadex.

    Originally, ICI pushed these new SERM’s to market as a “morning after” contraceptives, which were eventually approved by the FDA. (4) Yet again, the profit hungry and presumptuous drug manufacturer based its findings on rat studies, which would prove to be a mistake upon subsequent human research that showed the SERM’s induced, rather than inhibited ovulation. (4) Needless to say, tamoxifien was withdrawn as a contraceptive.

    And remember DES, the original synthetic estrogen developed back in the 1930’s? As it turned out, DES was found to increase the risk of breast cancer by 50%. Further research linked DES to millions of vaginal and testicular cancers among the children of mothers who took DES during pregnancy. (2,5)

    The light on synthetic anti-estrogens was dim, and by the late 1960’s, there was little enthusiasm to continue R&D with triphenylethylene based SERM’s, especially considering their inherently toxic effects (7, 10)

    It wasn’t until 1971, that tamoxifen would be dug up from the dead and considered as a candidate for cancer treatment.

    Treating cancer with a carcinogen –

    When research is done on anti-cancer drugs (such as SERMs), the aim is to find a drug that prolongs life, with the least amount of acute side-effects. In other words, the goal isn’t so much about finding a cure, as it is finding something that can alleviate the symptoms and/or prolong life.

    For an estrogen dependant cancer, the idea was simple – Block the proliferative action of estrogen with an anti-estrogen and slow the cancer growth. What could be more appropriate than an already available, orally active, patentable synthetic estrogen such as tamoxifen? It was a practical shoo-in.

    Therefore, in 1971, when drug researchers decided to examine all of the historical anti-cancer SERM data, they found that all of the SERM’s showed anti-proliferative activity on estrogen dependant cancer, and all of them demonstrated some extent of toxicity. (10, 37-39) However, the SERM that happened to show the least amount of toxicity was tamoxifen. (clomiphene missed the mark by showing a high rate of cataract formation)

    At the time, Pierre Blais, a well known drug researcher, commented on the finding (5) -


    “Tamoxifen is a garbage drug that made it to the top of the scrap heap. It is a DES in the making."

    In spite of the criticism from a number of researchers, the FDA approved tamoxifen as a cancer treatment in 1977, and in 1985 ICI was awarded a US patent for tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. (5) Soon, tamoxifen would become the most popularity prescribed cancer drug.

    “Its FDA approved for cancer treatment. It must be safe!”

    It’s wrong to assume that an “FDA approved” drug has a proven safety profile. The FDA has continually issued stronger health warnings for tamoxifen over the years. For instance, in 1994 the FDA demanded that the tamoxifen manufacturer Zeneca (an ICI sub-division), issue warning letters to health care practitioners about the increased risk of endometrial and gastro-intestinal cancers with tamoxifen use. Zeneca also reported adverse effects similar to those seen with DES, such as reproductive abnormalities in the animals whose mothers received tamoxifen. (remember, DES was the original synthetic estrogen, and also an analog to tamoxifen)

    A number of cancer researchers have pointed out the health risks too, such as Elwood et al (6) -


    “[Tamoxifen], therefore, is not appropriate for use in the general population because of the known increased risk of endometrial cancer”

    “So why is tamoxifen the most popularly prescribed cancer drug, if it’s so toxic?”

    The answer is simple. Tamoxifen is the lesser of two evils.

    Tamoxifen remains the most popularly prescribed drug because it is one of the few drugs that has shown a “statistically significant” improvement of the survival rate of breast cancer patients.* (Not to mention, tremendous financial motives and intraworking’s from its patent holder Zeneca)

    Remember, the goal in cancer treatment is to prolong life -- even if it means committing to therapy that is potentially cancerous or injurious to future health (as confirmed in long-term follow up’s and close examinations of tamoxifen patients).

    So, perhaps the risks are worthy for the cancer patient, but are they worthy for the health conscious male?

    * Most research has shown tamoxifen to improve the survival rate by 4-14%. For instance, over a 5 year period, 74% of the women survived who used tamoxifen, compared to 70% of the women on placebo. Depending on the type of cancer, this may translate into an extra 2-3 years of life for a cancer patient. (9) Continuing tamoxifen therapy for more than 5 years, results in increased tumor recurrences and serious side effects. (8)

    Translating the science, for men’s health -

    Fast forward 30 years, through hundreds of human and animal trials and we find that the research is quite extensive, and contradicting. (21)

    The damaging evidence from many early rat studies showed severely toxic effects, including the development of cancer in the liver, uterus, or testes upon tamoxifen administration. (30-34,41) However, this evidence was largely disregarded by further test tube studies on human cell-lines which appeared to show a lack of toxic effects. (21)

    This misleading test tube data gave the green flag to perform large scale human studies with tamoxifen in the 80’s and 90’s. Even more misleading, was the majority of the human research described tamoxifen as having a “low incidence of troublesome side effects” and that the “side effects where usually trivial”. (22)

    As science would uncover, the lack of human toxicity reported in original tamoxifen research was a result of insufficient study duration, inability to detect low level DNA damage with insensitive methodologies, and/or misdiagnosis of collateral cancers as metastasis infections from the breast cancer itself. (15, 21, 28-34)

    A word on clomiphene (Clomid) –

    Clomiphene (Clomid) consists of two stereoisomers which possess radically different pharmacodynamics. Zuclomiphene has predominantly estrogenic effects and slow clearance while the enclomiphene isomer has predominately anti-estrogenic effects and quick clearance. (9) This creates a dichotomy between estrogen blockage and estrogen stimulation and an acute imbalance once Clomid administration is discontinued. Bodybuilders will often complain of “estrogenic rebound” after stopping Clomid, which could be attributed to the lingering estrogenic isomer zuclomiphene as the anti-estrogenic enclomiphene has long cleared the system. (Recently, enclomiphene has been isolated by the pharmaceutical company Repros, for use in Androxal™.)

    For all intents and purposes, tamoxifen is a superior SERM, simply for the fact that tamoxifen provides a purely anti-estrogenic isomer, whereas Clomid provides a mix of anti and pro estrogenic effects.

    In regards to the health consequences about to be listed, it can be safely assumed that Clomid will share similar detrimental effects as tamoxifen, since it shares the same triphenylethylene backbone and carcinogenic tendencies. (44,45,57,58)

    Liver cancer -

    Originally, tamoxifen was accepted as being non-toxic to human liver upon finding that tamoxifen did not cause noticeable liver damage (DNA adducts) during short-term test tube studies with human liver cells. (35,36)

    However, it became apparent that test tuberesearch was largely flawed due to the low rate of metabolism in such a superficial environment. (21) It was soon discovered that the hepatotoxic effects from tamoxifen are from the metabolism and buildup of the a-hydroxytamoxifen and N-desmethyltamoxifen metabolites, which would only appear in an in vivo environment. (15) Surely enough, the results from the original rat studies showing dramatic carcinogenic effects on the liver, 30-34,41 soon correlated with human data when researchers found the same type of liver DNA adducts in tamoxifen patients. (15, 28-34)

    More recent human research has reported tamoxifen treated women to have 3x the risk of developing fatty liver disease, which occurs as soon as 3 months into therapy at only 20mg/day. (24-26) In some cases, the disease lasts up to 3 years, despite cessation from tamoxifen therapy. Five and ten year follow-ups with patients on long term tamoxifen therapy shows cases of deadly hepatocellular carcinoma. (27-29)

    In 2002, a bizarre study examined the use of tamoxifen for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment in humans. It was assumed that since tamoxifen could inhibit proliferation of breast cancer, it could offer the same benefit for liver cancer. The devastating results could not have been further indicative of tamoxifen’s hepatotoxic nature, as the tamoxifen treatment significantly increased the rate of death, compared to the group not receiving tamoxifen. (14)

    Finally, in a case study reviewing tamoxifen induced liver disease; D.F Moffat et al made a profound statement –

    “hepatocellular carcinoma in tamoxifen treated patients may be under-reported since there may be reluctance to biopsy liver tumours which are assumed to be secondary carcinoma of the breast.”

    In other words, it appears that the liver carcinoma from a large number of breast cancer patients on tamoxifen therapy has been misdiagnosed as an infection from the breast cancer itself. (28)

    Although the tamoxifen induced liver cancer make take years to manifest in a healthy male, its damaging effects could easily be exaggerated by other popular hepatotoxc , including 17aa oral steroids. (15)

    Prostate cancer -

    In 1996, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded that tamoxifen clearly promotes uterine cancer in humans – at a standard 20mg/day dose. (16,23,42) This is due to tamoxifen acting as an estrogen agonist in the uterus, presumably from the 4-hydroxytamoxifen metabolite, which triggers abnormal growth of the uterus and the formation of cancer causing DNA adducts. (33, 40)

    Contrary to popular thought, these implications are quite scary for a male when we realize the male equivalent to the uterus is the prostate – which differentiates from the same embryonic cell line, shares the same oncogene, Bcl-2, and high concentration of estrogen receptors. In fact, there is no reason to assume that tamoxifen would not initiate the same the same cancerous growth in the prostate. (60-62) It is no wonder that tamoxifen failed as a treatment for prostate carcinoma. (43)

    Note: This same risk would be applicable to Clomid, which has also been linked to uterine cancer and ovarian hyper-stimulation. (18, 19, 57, 59)

    Libido reduction & erectile dysfunction -

    Erectile dysfunction, low libido, and general impotence are typical complaints from men recently discontinuing steroids or HRT therapy, which is often combated by Clomid or Nolvadex, paradoxically so.

    Regardless of any positive effects on fertility or testosterone levels, Clomid and Nolvadex use is highly correlated with erectile dysfunction, libido suppression, and even emotional disorders. (10,47)

    Research with male breast cancer patients has also reported decreased libido, and thrombosis associated with tamoxifen use. (47) The thrombotic effect (blood vessel clogging) could explain the mechanism by which SERM’s may inhibit erectile function, by reducing circulation to erectile tissue. (47, 52)

    Increased susceptibility to gyno -

    Tamoxifen is often used to combat gyno during cycle when “flare ups” occur. While tamoxifen may provide immediate inhibition of proliferation, and serve as valuable tool, it can actually increase future susceptibility to gyno.

    This is caused by tamoxifen’s ability to up-regulate the progesterone receptor. (54-56) This can dramatically increase the chances of developming gyno in future cycles when utilizing progestin based anabolics such as Nandrolone (Deca) or Trenbolone (or any pro-hormone acting upon the progesterone receptor).

    It is interesting to speculate. Is tamoxifen use directly related to the increased gyno occurrences seen with modern day steroid users?

    Ocular toxicity –

    Another possible side effect associated with SERMs is visual cloudiness, loss of vision and even cataract formation. Although this tends to be a more common side effect from high dosed SERM therapy, standard 20mg/day tamoxifen regimes have been reported to cause these symptoms of ocular toxicity. (17, 46)

    Newer SERM’s -

    As the medical community became more aware of the side-effects associated with tamoxifen treatment, newer and safer SERMs, such as toremifene and raloxifene hit the developmental fast track. Toremifene appears to be less liver toxic, but it is a closely related analog of tamoxifen, so it also carries many of the related genotoxic effects. (48,49)

    Raloxifene is a newer SERM based off a benzothiophene structure, which appears to make it less toxic in the liver, uterus or prostate. (50-52) Unfortunately, Raloxifene has been associated with a higher incidence of thromboembolism (52), and also has very low oral absorption, making it an expensive alternative at a typical dose (120mg/day). (53) Still, Raloxifene could presumably be equally effective as Clomid or Nolvadex at restoring HPTA function, while imparting less side effects. (53)

    Newer SERMs are already being evaluated such as bazedoxifene, arzoxifene, and lasofoxifene, in hopes of reducing risk even further. (further enumerating the evidence of toxicity with the tamoxifen generation of SERM’s)

    What to do now?

    Firstly, it should become a priority to create awareness about the possible side effects of SERMs. Once educated, users will be able to start reducing their requirements of these drugs, and begin adopting healthier, more responsible alternatives.

    Carefully planned cycles, and the proper use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) must pursue over haphazard combinations of excessively dosed aromatizing AAS’s -- which require high doses of SERM’s to reduce possible side-effects. Whereas avoiding SERM’s in HRT will involve the natural clearance and management of endogenous estrogens.

    It will be important to maintain testicular function during cycle for a quick and efficient recovery of natural testosterone production for PCT – negating the need for high dose 2-3 month SERM based PCT’s. (For more information on the proper use of hCG during cycle, visit here)

    Thus, abolishing the bad habit of SERMing will involve community wide enlightenment with careful, comprehensive planning of worthy alternatives.
  22. Professional Member
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,813
    Rep Power
    8932
    Level
    51
    Lv. Percent
    89.39%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    SERMs are not toxic for short term use- ur fine
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html
  23. Professional Member
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,813
    Rep Power
    8932
    Level
    51
    Lv. Percent
    89.39%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    or should I say that serms are toxic but in the short term they are not going to hurt you irreversibly
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html
  24. Advanced Member
    RAHHH's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  210 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    573
    Rep Power
    349
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    28.04%

    Quote Originally Posted by xxl610 View Post
    hey im new to this posting thing so if i say something wrong in here please cut me some slack. i dont think i am. so i ran a cycle of deca and test E with a dbol kicker for 14 weeks that ended in Jan. i happened to be moving at the end of my cycle and ran low on funds and didnt PCT. stupid i know . its been six months and my libido and my workouts are still laging to say the least. ive been taking that i force reversitol for about a month and has helped a little bit but things still dont feel right. i was thinking of getting some hcg to try and get my natural test going again. i figure i should do some blood work to figure out exactly whats going on before i just start pumping more stuff in me. i am new to So Cal (north county SD) and dont have medical insurance or anything like that. if any one has advice on where to get blood work done for a reasonable price or if im even aproaching this the right way id be VERY appreciative! Thanks guys.
    reversitol and yohimbine should help wiht test and labido.
    for better labido and workouts i would rec a stack of ASGT preWO, sustain alphaLV and T-911.
  25. New Member
    heckler7's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  210 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    457
    Rep Power
    1873
    Level
    17
    Lv. Percent
    97.82%

    Urgent care is usaully $60 dollars cash and you can get some labs ordered. Also I've seen hormone test kits on the internet but they're pricey.
    I'm not a doctor, but I would try tribulus, that gets me going. Or Torem, it will make your boys hang like a marshmellow about to fall into a camp fire.
    If you have any aircraft engine problems than I can help ya, thats my specailty.
  26. New Member
    xxl610's Avatar
    Stats
    6'10"  298 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    63
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    7.5%

    Perfect. Thanks for the info. I will go in and try and get my blood done. Fresh outa aircraft engines though. Ill send any of those questions your way.
  27. Banned
    gamer2be08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,988
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    54
    Lv. Percent
    17.08%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeGfilms View Post
    How does tanning and eating sat. fats raise test levels?
    http://www.pegym.com/forums/beginner...-its-free.html

    And sat fats do increase testosterone.. Do your google research.
  28. Banned
    gamer2be08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,988
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    54
    Lv. Percent
    17.08%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by andro View Post
    im guessing he means that sat.fats will increase test through cholesterol. which is actually true. tanning, how does this increase test? increase in vitamin d affect test?
    http://www.pegym.com/forums/beginner...-its-free.html

    And sat fats do increase testosterone.. Do your google research.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. AAS & Blood Work
    By roids1 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-17-2009, 11:54 PM
  2. blood work
    By Metalocalypse in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-03-2008, 06:21 PM
  3. Blood Work
    By RyanOFelt in forum Nutrition / Health
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-04-2008, 03:58 PM
  4. ?'s about getting blood work
    By timyg1337 in forum Cycle Info
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-01-2006, 10:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in