are the later bathces of m14add bunk? - AnabolicMinds.com

are the later bathces of m14add bunk?

  1. Professional Member
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,813
    Rep Power
    8930

    Reputation

    are the later bathces of m14add bunk?


    I am looking at ordering two bottles of this but heard it tested for dhea awhile back. Does anyone know if this is still the case with the later batches? WOuld I be better going with something like lmg which is not reported to be bunkkkkkk?
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html

  2. Diamond Member
    jbryand101b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,683
    Rep Power
    2105284

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    sht man, idk, i've thought about getting some too. i dont know if i should go with cel, or another brand.

    the companies I trust dont make m14add clones.
  3. Professional Member
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,813
    Rep Power
    8930

    Reputation

    yessssss i think im going to go with a clone of lmg to stack with my pmag for the winter.....there is some new company i came across that makes it.....they called underground labs
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html
    •   
       

  4. New Member
    MikeGfilms's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  186 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Age
    25
    Posts
    457
    Rep Power
    298

    Reputation

    Yes therye good now, the bunk batches were awhile back. i had a buddy who just ran a cycle of it at 90/120/120/120/90 and gained around 18lb...gotta hate the water retention lol.
  5. Elite Member
    UnrealMachine's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  218 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,083
    Rep Power
    5025

    Reputation

    the bunk batches of this stuff were years ago... people worry about it too much.
    Mostly answered PM's
    Don't post on my profile, I don't read that stuff, PM me instead
    <------ Hard to believe, but I wasn't on any anabolics in the avatar shot
  6. Professional Member
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,813
    Rep Power
    8930

    Reputation

    once again mr. unreal.....u give me a reality check...ima put in an order for two bottles of this **** RIGHT THE **** NOW!
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html
  7. Professional Member
    schwellington's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,813
    Rep Power
    8930

    Reputation

    uhmmm me


    first of all though when is the exp date on it?
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html
  8. Diamond Member
    jbryand101b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,683
    Rep Power
    2105284

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    any methylated steroid i need to dose over 100mg, you can keep.
  9. Binging on Pure ****ing Rage
    Mulletsoldier's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,226
    Rep Power
    27063

    Reputation

    I honestly think, amongst all the dribble, these posts piss me off more than anything.

    I have seen people ingest ungodly combinations of two, three or four methylated steroids produced by a company who has not existed for more than a few months, has no customer service line, a barely legible website, and happily consume these pills without a moments thought as to where this company procures its raw materials from, and so forth.

    Then we have CEL, on the other hand: they have posted more manufacturers' COAs than I have ever seen a company - distributing steroidal products, or otherwise - post, have had various sources confirm that their methylmasteron was indeed procured from the source of the original Designer Supplement's SuperDrol, and have generally gone out of their way to validate something which does not require validation.

    It is an idiotic question, mostly because it is only being asked of one company - whereas these sheep are consuming other steroids, from other companies, that were most likely made in a basement bathtub.
  10. Diamond Member
    jbryand101b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,683
    Rep Power
    2105284

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    im sorry to break this too you, but cels c.o.a.'s aren't worth anything.

    they have posted those coa's and outside sources have tested their products and found them to have one or more discrepency in what their coa's claim.

    in the words of chris farley, tommy boy "anyone can slap a gurantee on a box, hell, you want me to take a sh it in a box, and gurantee it, I will"

    aside from the products that have been tested as less than pure, what is important is user results.

    it may not be cels fault, they are a non us company, with no office in the us, so it could be their suppliers, and the lab that test the products.

    if mdrol was from the same source as orig sd, and they had a labeling error, then why did they never fix it? like you said, mdrol wasn't a fly by night supplement, it was around for a long time, and the labeling issue, never got fixed.
    maybe because it is illegal to intentionally mis label a product......just saying.....
  11. Elite Member
    GeekPoop's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  232 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Age
    27
    Posts
    5,263
    Rep Power
    234818

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by jbryand101b View Post
    im sorry to break this too you, but cels c.o.a.'s aren't worth anything.

    they have posted those coa's and outside sources have tested their products and found them to have one or more discrepency in what their coa's claim.

    in the words of chris farley, tommy boy "anyone can slap a gurantee on a box, hell, you want me to take a sh it in a box, and gurantee it, I will"

    aside from the products that have been tested as less than pure, what is important is user results.

    it may not be cels fault, they are a non us company, with no office in the us, so it could be their suppliers, and the lab that test the products.

    if mdrol was from the same source as orig sd, and they had a labeling error, then why did they never fix it? like you said, mdrol wasn't a fly by night supplement, it was around for a long time, and the labeling issue, never got fixed.
    maybe because it is illegal to intentionally mis label a product......just saying.....
    ask another company for a COA, bet you wont get it

    Cel backs all their products, if you dont gain and complain they fix it and make it right.
    Serious Nutrition Solutions
  12. Diamond Member
    jbryand101b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,683
    Rep Power
    2105284

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    'so why do they put a gurantee on the box"

    "because, they know they sold you a guranteed piece of crap'

    just because they provide coa's doesn't mean anything if when someone else test the product, and the results aren't the same.

    as with all test, what makes something worth anything is test, re-test reliability.

    a quality product doesn't need any coa, the results will speak for themselves.

    end of story, this argument is/will be never ending.

    you like what you like.
  13. Elite Member
    GeekPoop's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  232 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Age
    27
    Posts
    5,263
    Rep Power
    234818

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by jbryand101b View Post
    'so why do they put a gurantee on the box"

    "because, they know they sold you a guranteed piece of crap'

    just because they provide coa's doesn't mean anything if when someone else test the product, and the results aren't the same.

    as with all test, what makes something worth anything is test, re-test reliability.

    a quality product doesn't need any coa, the results will speak for themselves.

    end of story, this argument is/will be never ending.

    you like what you like.
    I must be blind, I never saw any time of guratee on a CEL product.

    haters gonna hate lol
    Serious Nutrition Solutions
  14. Diamond Member
    jbryand101b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,683
    Rep Power
    2105284

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by GeekPoop View Post
    ask another company for a COA, bet you wont get it

    Cel backs all their products, if you dont gain and complain they fix it and make it right.
    no my friend, not blind, but not the sharpest tool in the shed. (probably d/t too many tainted cel products. j/k)

    that was another movie quote, used as an analogy to respond to your comment above.

    "cel backs all their products" "coa's, all showing 99% purity"

    hey, if those aren't meant to be gurantees, well, shhit, you should of just agreed with me in the first place.

    and I dont hate cel, I've used their hdrol, and it was a great product.

    their pstanz was good too.

    their estane sucked though.
  15. Elite Member
    UnrealMachine's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  218 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,083
    Rep Power
    5025

    Reputation

    CEL is a great company and they work hard to make sure their customers are getting quality product. That said I've run a boatload of Superdrol and the Mdrol I got in 2007 wasn't Superdrol it did NOTHING and I had to mini-log that **** going up to 60mg a day before people believed me. And my batch of Mdrol had a perfect 99.9% purity in their COA. So the COA has ceased to mean anything to me.

    Anyway I know mistakes get made and CEL has promised me a free bottle of whatever I wanted to log in the future to make up for it. Soooo if you buy CEL and the worst case scenario occurs they will probably take care of you.

    One thing to note here is that there are more threads asking if some product is bunk than there are people with bunk products. And then the readers see questions about "is my bottle of ____ bunk" and they are some n00b who's never run a cycle so they freak out and think their stuff may not work on them and ask about it too and it's a cycle that feeds itself.

    Buy your bottles and stop worrying about it so much, there's no 100% guarantees on anything here, even if something is legit there's no guarantee you'll respond well to the product anyway. The bigger companies usually have good customer support. I have a lot of respect for CEL and PP myself.
    Mostly answered PM's
    Don't post on my profile, I don't read that stuff, PM me instead
    <------ Hard to believe, but I wasn't on any anabolics in the avatar shot
  16. Binging on Pure ****ing Rage
    Mulletsoldier's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,226
    Rep Power
    27063

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by jbryand101b View Post
    im sorry to break this too you, but cels c.o.a.'s aren't worth anything.

    they have posted those coa's and outside sources have tested their products and found them to have one or more discrepency in what their coa's claim.

    in the words of chris farley, tommy boy "anyone can slap a gurantee on a box, hell, you want me to take a sh it in a box, and gurantee it, I will"

    aside from the products that have been tested as less than pure, what is important is user results.

    it may not be cels fault, they are a non us company, with no office in the us, so it could be their suppliers, and the lab that test the products.

    if mdrol was from the same source as orig sd, and they had a labeling error, then why did they never fix it? like you said, mdrol wasn't a fly by night supplement, it was around for a long time, and the labeling issue, never got fixed.
    maybe because it is illegal to intentionally mis label a product......just saying.....
    Links to the independent labs?
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. CEL Mdrol & M14ADD or Hdrol & M14ADD?
    By Hustlers in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 03-07-2011, 07:55 AM
  2. Is it teh bunk?
    By Trento in forum Old School Hormone Use
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-16-2010, 03:50 AM
  3. Bunk IGF-1 LR3!!!
    By elcid2007 in forum IGF-1/GH
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-31-2010, 07:26 PM
  4. Anyone seen this stuff...if so, is it bunk?
    By dhuge67 in forum IGF-1/GH
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-27-2007, 11:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in