Mdrol vs. PPlex (Which One First in a Cycle)

gotbench600

New member
I have taken a cycle of Mdrol in the past and although the sides were a bit harsh I recovered fine and the size and especially the strength I achieved at the end of the cycle which was bridged from a short Spawn cycle were tremendous. I have not taken PPLEX but I have read that the strength gains are also substantial. I compete as a power lifter and am trying to decide whether to take the Mdrol 1st then bridge into PPLEX or PPLEX first and bridge into MDROL. Like I said, the power I got with the MDROL taking it at the end of my cycle helped me put up a 600 pound bench press in April at a BW of 234 so I want to make sure I have that going into my next meet. If PPLEX will deliver the same level of power and/or maintain the power I achieve through the MDROL then I'll bridge into the PPLEX from MDROL I have seen in most MDROL/PPLEX logs i have read.

Any thoughts either way?
 
would never touch m-drol again man. It gave me gyno that cost me over a g to get removed. I would rec turinabol + androhard by Primordial performance as. it has low side effects and the androhard blocks gyno.
 
I'd run the m first. I figure the p plex would help you
hold on to gains.
 
Thanks for the info. As far as gyno goes. Everybody is different. I have never had a problem whether I was on real gear or when I did my Mdrol cycle. Some guys are naturally more prone than others if you introduce the right chemical into their body.
 
Ive been doing a ton of research on PP lately (prepping for an upcoming cycle), and most logs that involve the two run the M-drol first, with the PP being shown to help hold onto the gain made by Mdrol.
 
gotbench600 said:
I have taken a cycle of Mdrol in the past and although the sides were a bit harsh I recovered fine and the size and especially the strength I achieved at the end of the cycle which was bridged from a short Spawn cycle were tremendous. I have not taken PPLEX but I have read that the strength gains are also substantial. I compete as a power lifter and am trying to decide whether to take the Mdrol 1st then bridge into PPLEX or PPLEX first and bridge into MDROL. Like I said, the power I got with the MDROL taking it at the end of my cycle helped me put up a 600 pound bench press in April at a BW of 234 so I want to make sure I have that going into my next meet. If PPLEX will deliver the same level of power and/or maintain the power I achieve through the MDROL then I'll bridge into the PPLEX from MDROL I have seen in most MDROL/PPLEX logs i have read.

Any thoughts either way?
Click to expand...

why do you use the term "bridge" somany times. thats not what your doing, all your doing is running a longer cycle with 2 orals. bridging to the next "cycle" with say 250mg testE ew for a couple months, that would be a bridge.
running the other oral isnt going to "help you hold on to gains" as your still on cycle and shut down till your compleatly off.
just my 0.2cents .
for a good size in gains and low sides:
I would reac also the turinabol + androhard and sustain alphaLV by Primordial performance + ASGT over what your thinking above. :-)


as for wich one to run first run wichever is dryer last I guess.
 
RAHHH said:
running the other oral isnt going to "help you hold on to gains" as your still on cycle and shut down till your compleatly off.
Click to expand...

it's not a matter of shutdown it's a matter of how long your body has had to become accustomed to the gains... I.E. if you gain 15 pounds over 3 weeks, how much of it are you going to keep? Now if you gain 15 pounds over 3 weeks then use a lighter anabolic for 2-3 more weeks, stay up 15 pounds and harden up a bit, don't you think you'd be able to keep a bigger % of the gains?
 
qwerty33 said:
would never touch m-drol again man. It gave me gyno that cost me over a g to get removed. I would rec turinabol + androhard by Primordial performance as. it has low side effects and the androhard blocks gyno.
Click to expand...

what was your pct??
 
my friend ran superdrone lv and got gyno post cycle, this was his first cycle ever. he ran clomid. he got gyno DURING pct actually, he was still taking the clomid. crazy...
 
GnastyMcNasty said:
my friend ran superdrone lv and got gyno post cycle, this was his first cycle ever. he ran clomid. he got gyno DURING pct actually, he was still taking the clomid. crazy...
Click to expand...

that doesn't sound crazy to me. Clomid isn't known for its anti-estrogenic activity, it's a SERM but it's different than nolva... nolva used to be on-cycle estrogen control and gyno prevention but clomid is never used in this purpose because clomid can't treat gyno. Clomid works better for blasting up natural test, which will convert to more estrogen and spike estrogen. My friend was getting gyno from his clomid PCT too. Anyway this is why a while ago i mentioned the synergy with running both.
 
really... so maybe the clomid caused the gyno. i'll let him know to run both next time and get the best of both worlds. btw dude my buddy right now is taking methyl-trienolone stacked with halotestin. ****ing insane. 250 mcgs oral tren, 30 mg halo. i didnt think it could get any more toxic than sd/pp, but i guess i was wrong
 
UnrealMachine said:
that doesn't sound crazy to me. Clomid isn't known for its anti-estrogenic activity, it's a SERM but it's different than nolva... nolva used to be on-cycle estrogen control and gyno prevention but clomid is never used in this purpose because clomid can't treat gyno. Clomid works better for blasting up natural test, which will convert to more estrogen and spike estrogen. My friend was getting gyno from his clomid PCT too. Anyway this is why a while ago i mentioned the synergy with running both.
Click to expand...

Totally agree with you about the synergy..
 
GnastyMcNasty said:
really... so maybe the clomid caused the gyno. i'll let him know to run both next time and get the best of both worlds. btw dude my buddy right now is taking methyl-trienolone stacked with halotestin. ****ing insane. 250 mcgs oral tren, 30 mg halo. i didnt think it could get any more toxic than sd/pp, but i guess i was wrong
Click to expand...

dude that's kinda ****ed up. The stuff i've read about methyl tren is scary, and the toxicity of halotestin makes SD look like kids stuff. Those compounds have no place outside of 1) pre-contest or 2) PLing competition. How long is he running it? you can't run that stack long enough to make any gains you'll keep.
 
he said he's already been on halo 3 weeks now, this is his 3rd day on the oral tren. he's going for pure gains in strength i think. he's already piled on a ton of mass, he looks like you probably, since you said your avatar was when you were 212. he's 245 with low bf%. i dont know how long he plans on running the oral tren for, my guess is 3-4 weeks?? btw he's also on TRT 300 mg cyp a week plus 200 mg of deca a week for his "joints" lol. the dude's a beast. but anyway with that kind of maintenance who knows maybe he'll keep the gains in strength he makes on this stack. i doubt it though
 
that sounds like a custom TRT dose lol I think the highest they prescribe is 200mg a week but that's all cool i'm on a custom dose of 350 a week and i'm 23 O.o haha. Some "deca" trt for the joints sounds good too lol... I'm doing a light masteron "trt" just for some mild hardening haha.
 
UnrealMachine said:
it's not a matter of shutdown it's a matter of how long your body has had to become accustomed to the gains... I.E. if you gain 15 pounds over 3 weeks, how much of it are you going to keep? Now if you gain 15 pounds over 3 weeks then use a lighter anabolic for 2-3 more weeks, stay up 15 pounds and harden up a bit, don't you think you'd be able to keep a bigger % of the gains?
Click to expand...

if you gain 15lbs in 3 weeks its NOT muscle so noo i dont expect you to keep anything much
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top