does anyone think that 90% absorption is a little high?

  1. Registered User
    iamcdn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    47
    Answers
    0

    does anyone think that 90% absorption is a little high?


    does anyone think that 90% absorption is a little high?

    from s'ology

    GelSport bro, its just about ready to hit the market apparently! they are not intending to compete with the other UG's... they are going after a niche market - 'bros who dont want to inject'... which I think is a great idea. The company is named GelSport and will have a complete line of topical gels and orals so that those who dont wish to inject can run a complete and proper cycle. The gels will use dmso and other proven carriers and will have a very high rate of absorption... one that will put the pharmaceutical "androgel" to shame. Testing to maximize absorption is currently underway, and absorption rates are coming in at a little over 90%.

    Initial gels to be released are:

    Testosterone
    Nandrolone (deca)
    Boldenone (EQ)

    Initial orals to be realeased:
    Stanozolol (winny)
    Methandrostenolone (dbol)
    Oxandrolone (anavar)
    Nolva
    Clen

  2. Registered User
    x_muscle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    627
    Answers
    0


    ya i heard about these seems interesting, but all they using is DMSO. so i dont know how they are detting 90% absorption!!

    and these products are only for Canada, is this true?
  3. Registered User
    jweave23's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  237 lbs.
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    2,628
    Answers
    0


    that sounds ridiculous to me. I would have to see these exact tests to believe anything near that close.
    •   
       

  4. Moderator
    WYD02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    818
    Answers
    0


    This is bull****.... They will never get that abosorbtion rate transdermally...sorry, it just aint happening. It further reduces their credibility when talking about making DBOL transdermals which already have a high bioavailability being a 17aa oral.... whatever....
  5. Registered User
    iamcdn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    47
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by whosyourdaddy02
    This is bull****.... They will never get that abosorbtion rate transdermally...sorry, it just aint happening. It further reduces their credibility when talking about making DBOL transdermals which already have a high bioavailability being a 17aa oral.... whatever....
    bro they are releasing dbol as an oral
  6. Registered User
    Skye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    1,946
    Answers
    0


    Somehow this sounds like finaderm reborn here. we just went through this BS with them trandermal limitations FINADERM?!?!?!?!
  7. Registered User
    spooler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Age
    55
    Posts
    66
    Answers
    0


    Yup, It's bull****.
  8. Registered User
    Skye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    1,946
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by whosyourdaddy02
    This is bull****.... They will never get that abosorbtion rate transdermally...sorry, it just aint happening. It further reduces their credibility when talking about making DBOL transdermals which already have a high bioavailability being a 17aa oral.... whatever....
    There doing that becuase some dumb SOBs are claming that by doing so it prevents liver damage. The fact that injecting or taking transdermally bipasses the first (primary some say) pass throught the liver doesn't mean that it is now nontoxic. It might REDUCE the toxicity a little (highly debatable) but it will not make it nontoxic. The liver still has to deal with it, regardless of the delivery methoed. They really must think that anyone into steroids are stupid if they think we don't know this.
  9. Registered User
    size's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Age
    42
    Posts
    4,233
    Answers
    0


    I do not believe it. It would be nice but this is just not true.

    On a related note, has anyone yet to hear any feedback on finaderm?
  10. Registered User
    Skye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    1,946
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by size
    I do not believe it. It would be nice but this is just not true.

    On a related note, has anyone yet to hear any feedback on finaderm?
    no but I haven't been back to WCB sence then. I respect bass but I can't hang with the way that was delt with. They got on as sponsers at MM for about a day before they pissed off blackdream. I swear, they have to be there own worst enemies. I don't expect to hear any postitve feedback on them anyway as so much of there claims were obvously BS.
  11. Registered User
    size's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Age
    42
    Posts
    4,233
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by Skye
    I don't expect to hear any postitve feedback on them anyway as so much of there claims were obvously BS.
    My thoughts also.
  12. Registered User
    flexster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Age
    40
    Posts
    63
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by iamcdn
    does anyone think that 90% absorption is a little high?

    from s'ology

    GelSport bro, its just about ready to hit the market apparently! they are not intending to compete with the other UG's... they are going after a niche market - 'bros who dont want to inject'... which I think is a great idea. The company is named GelSport and will have a complete line of topical gels and orals so that those who dont wish to inject can run a complete and proper cycle. The gels will use dmso and other proven carriers and will have a very high rate of absorption... one that will put the pharmaceutical "androgel" to shame. Testing to maximize absorption is currently underway, and absorption rates are coming in at a little over 90%.

    Initial gels to be released are:

    Testosterone
    Nandrolone (deca)
    Boldenone (EQ)

    Initial orals to be realeased:
    Stanozolol (winny)
    Methandrostenolone (dbol)
    Oxandrolone (anavar)
    Nolva
    Clen
    Does this company have a website?
  13. Registered User
    Longdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    1,261
    Answers
    0


    While I'm sure 90% absorption is not true, they will have no problem selling the stuff to people afraid to pin.
  14. Registered User
    Skye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    1,946
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by Longdog
    While I'm sure 90% absorption is not true, they will have no problem selling the stuff to people afraid to pin.
    I'm scared that you’re right. I just hope they realized that the other claims are BS. I have a disturbing mental image of some moron using Dbol/winny/Halo combo for 12 months straight because finaderm prevents liver damage.
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Does anyone think lat pulldowns are ineffective ?
    By ReaperX in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 07-15-2008, 04:10 PM
  2. You think that puppy video is bad
    By ReaperX in forum General Chat
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-15-2008, 03:19 AM
  3. Does anyone know exercise that grow more muscle fibers??
    By bishop17 in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-12-2007, 12:30 PM
  4. does anyone have a list of foods that lower/control E2
    By rockstar6181 in forum Male Anti-Aging Medicine
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-11-2007, 09:24 PM
  5. Does anyone know what this is?
    By gtrplayer5555 in forum Supplement Logs
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-22-2006, 08:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in