SARMs S4 dose frequency question

liv2grow

New member
Awards
0
Since S4 has a half life of approx. 4 hours what is the general thought on how it should be taken in terms of doses per day? For example, if one was to take 50mg of S4 ED would it be best to take 1 dose say pre-work out or split it into 2 doses at like 6am and 6pm or even split up the doses even more? Since 50mg is a relatively small dose I’m not sure if it would be better to split up the dose or take it all at once. However with a larger dose of 100mg to 150mg I think it would be best to split it up into 3 or so throughout the day.

Please give me your thoughts.
 
junkyarddogzz

junkyarddogzz

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
I love the sarms...I recommend smaller doses split up. Dont go over 100mgs.

I like to keep it in the 50-70mg range
 
Jasen

Jasen

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
can any1 share more info on S4? like what does the pct look like, what type of gains expected dry/wet? etc etc
 
junkyarddogzz

junkyarddogzz

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
can any1 share more info on S4? like what does the pct look like, what type of gains expected dry/wet? etc etc
dry gains...more body comp changes.

I like 50mg to 75mg ed.
 
jbryand101b

jbryand101b

Banned
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
can any1 share more info on S4? like what does the pct look like, what type of gains expected dry/wet? etc etc

here is some info i posted in a previous thread that is about sarms,

well, who knows, but i did come across this today.

s4 tested.

The SARM which is closest to being marketable is S4 or andarine. The makers of S4 are already doing human trials. S4 is primarily intended for cancer sufferers who are losing muscle mass. At first it looked as though S4 might not be such an effective muscle enhancer, but later studies have proved otherwise. Pat Arnold has posted information on it, although his postings indicated that he doesn’t regard S4 as worthwhile marketing. ‘Too expensive’ was Arnold’s verdict. There are also postings on message boards from athletes who experiment on themselves with S4. [Structural formula shown below.]










Mario Thevis was prompted by the web discussions to go in search of websites claiming to sell S4. He came across *** Products, which recently started selling S4. For research purposes, not for human consumption, we should add here.


The bottles, Thevis writes in Drug Testing & Analysis, contain 30 ml of an oily fluid. They are in a box with words with something like 'face moisturizer and green tea extract' on the packaging. One ml of the substance contains 150 mg S4, according to Thevis. This is strange. All the products we know of contain only 50mg/ml. Looks like a friendly Chinese bulk supplier was giving discount on S4.


The product that Thevis tested was not pure. Each ml also contained 15 mg of a compound that is produced when S4 is synthesised, and which the manufacturer should have purified out of the preparation. The structural formula of the contaminant is shown here below.










For Thevis this is evidence that this S4 does not come from a legally operating company. And that S4 is used by chemical athletes. "The present report demonstrates once more that the misuse of therapeutics in early or advanced clinical trials by athletes cannot be dismissed, especially when anecdotal evidence for the misuse of S4 is frequently discussed in respective Internet-based chat rooms", Thevis concludes.


Maybe it’s just a coincidence, but ******* has published a lab analysis on its website, which states that *** Products’ Liquid S4 does not contain contaminants.


Source:
Drug Test. Analysis 2009, 1, 387–392.
im sure there is also more info about sarms, you can find the thread by searching "sarms s4 cost" it will be the first thread, 3 pages long. seth r has some post in it also.

here is some more info, not to overload, but i like to research............
-----------------------------

20. Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARM's)


Aede de Groot, Willem Koert


The pharmaceutical industry is actively searching for successors of anabolic steroids. These new substances are called Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators or SARM’s. In this chapter we will explain how SARM’s look like and describe the state of the art.


The full name of anabolic steroids is in fact androgenic anabolic steroids. Scientists usually call them androgens and omit the anabolic part of the name. The reason is that the receptor that mediates the effects of androgenic anabolic steroids, is called the Androgen receptor. In Chapter 8 we have explained how this works. We have used the name anabolic steroids to emphasize the main subject of this Anabolics book.


There is only one androgen receptor and it is everywhere present in our body; in bones, muscles, liver, skin, prostate and in the central nervous system. This receptor mediates the effects of the two natural steroid hormones testosterone and dihydrotestosterone and of synthetic anabolic steroids. It does this by activating genes or other non genomic cell signaling systems.


The Leydig cells in the testes produce 90% of the testosterone in a mans body, the adrenal gland and the liver produce the other 10%. Testosterone stimulates libido and sperm production. It circulates in the blood and in muscles it acts as an anabolic steroid. The enzyme 5a-reductase converts testosterone to dihydrotestosterone in the prostate, the liver and the skin. Dihydrotestosterone is responsible for the androgenic effects, such as beard growth, body hair, acne, and in elder man for pattern baldness and enlargement of the prostate. The enzyme aromatase converts a small part (0.2%) of the testosterone into estradiol. Estradiol is essential for the growth of bones and it plays a role in libido and cognition. There are two receptors that mediate the effects of estradiol. Testosterone, dihydrotestosterone and estradiol, each in appropriate quantities, are essential for a normal functioning body.


The pharmaceutical industry has performed extensive research on synthetic anabolic steroids. This has led to medicines for hypogonadism, muscle wasting diseases, anaemia, benign prostate enlargement and prostate cancer. For women medines for mammary cancer, osteoperose and hormone therapy were developed. All this research has been only partial successful. Long lasting application of synthetic steroid hormones often showed serious side effects and liver toxicity. A lack of receptor selectively and just partial separation of anabolic and androgenic activities are the main reasons for side effects.


Anabolic steroids sometimes also fit in the steroid receptors for estrogens, progestagens, and corticosteroids. We then see the side effects that are mediated by these non-androgenic ligand–receptor complexes. This becomes more probable when high concentrations of anabolic steroids are present, as is the case with bodybuilders that use high doses of anabolic steroids. Well known side effects are water retention and gynecomastia.



Elder men

Anabolic steroids are not only popular with fitnessers and bodybuilders. Also elder men may benefit from the use of anabolics. The production of testosterone deminishes and the production of Sex Hormone Binding Globuline (SHBG) increases with age. Both factors are unfavourable for the availablity of testosterone for the androgen receptor. This may lead to less energy, decrease of muscle power, deminished sexual performance and sometimes to depression.


External testosterone suppletion can counteract these phenomena, but there are some drawbacks. Medics are worried about overstimulation of the prostate, and unfavourable effects on haert and blood vessels. Besides, testosterone is not orally available because of fast metabolic transformations. It can be taken parentally or a testosterone containing gel can be put on the skin. Chemists have developed a large variety of synthetic anabolic steroids, also to deal with aging problems. Many of these are described in the former chapters. However, each synthetic steroid has its own drawbacks and side effects.


Chemists, biochemists and pharmacists have been only partly successful in adapting anabolic steroids, so that they only form complexes with the androgen receptor and not with the other steroid receptors. Besides, the steroid-androgen receptor complexes ideally should only mediate the desired anabolic effects and not the tedious androgenic effects. That also has been only partially successful. Therefore, scientists and especially the pharmaceutical industry are now investigating compounds with completely different, non-steroidal, chemical structures. They try to find compounds with high selectivity for the androgen receptor, with good anabolic and no androgenic activity.


These compounds are called Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator or SARM's. They should improve muscle strength, give more energy, stimulate a better mood, libido and sexual performance, without detrimental effects on the prostate, liver, heart and blood vessels. In women they should deal with frailty and osteoperose without virilizing effects



We are all getting older and older and like to enjoy a healthy life as long as possible. Also bodybuilders and fitnessers are of course interested in good SARM’s that stimulate muscle growth without riscs and tedious side effects. There is a big demand for such compounds and the pharmaceutical industry is working hard to find them. Regularly good reviews about SARM’s appear in the scientific literature. [1] [2]


It is not really simple to find a good SARM. A good SARM should have the same interaction with the androgen receptor as testosterone and that should be all.


SARM’s should not form complexes with the other steroid recoptors for estrogens, progestagens and corticosteroids, to avoid the side effects that are mediated by these ligand-receptor complexes. SARM's also should not bind to SHBG. In this way the SARM remains available for the androgen receptor and can be applied in a lower dose. Also possible non-genomic effects of SHBG-SARM complexes will not be mediated.


SARM’s should not inhibit the enzyme aromatase. The body needs the small quantity of estradiol that is also produced by men, for bone formation and cognition.


A good SARM should not or as little as possible, interfere with the natural production of testosterone and sperm. The production of testosterone in the Leydig cells in the testes is under control of the so called Hypothalamus-Pituary-Testes Axis (HPT-axis). This process starts with nerve stimulation of the hypothalamus to secrete the Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH). This is a small peptide hormone (see Chapter 3), which stimulates the pituary to release two glyco-peptide hormones, the Luteinizing Hormone (LH) and the Folikel Stimulating Hormone (FSH) (see Figure 1).



LH then stimulates the Leydig cells in the testes to produce testosterone and the concentration of testosterone in the blood increases. This higher concentration of testosterone on its turn will inhibit the further production of GnHR and LH. The testosterone in the blood is metabolised in the liver and removed from the body. This results in a lowering of the concentration of testosterone in the blood. This lower concentration will decrease the inhibition of the hypothalamus and the pituary, and the whole process restarts. This feedback regulation of the testosterone production prevents large fluctuations of its concentration in the blood.


Synthetic anabolic steroids in high concentrations also inhibit the release of GnRH, LH and FSH and in this way the body’s own production of testosterone and sperm is stopped. The testes have nothing to do and shrink. When the use or abuse of anabolics is stopped the production of testosterone and sperm recovers but this may take some time.


A good SARM should not inhibit the secretion of GnRH, LH and FSH completely and that is a problem. In its interactions with receptors the SARM resembles testosterone. In the androgen receptor in the muscles this is a desirable interaction, but the interaction with the receptors in the hypothalamus and the pituari should not lead to inhibition of the release of GnRH, LH and FSH. The opposite is desired for SARM's that are developed for male contraception. These SARM's are ment to suppress or stop the sperm production.


It will not necessarily lead to problems when the body’s own production of testosterone will be down to a low level due to the application of a SARM. The SARM itself will take over the anabolic function of testosterone. When there is very little testosterone also the production of dihydrotestosterone will be low. That is an advantage because then also the androgenic effects of dihydrotestosterone will be prevented. The body does need the small quantity of estradiol, but in most cases there will be enough testosterone produced, to take care of that.


The SARM should be orally available, and preferrably should not be taken more often then once per day. This means that metabolic transformations of the SARM should not be too fast. The SARM itself and its metabolites should not be toxic.


The perfect SARM has to fulfill all these conditions. But just as with anabolic steroids, one SARM does this in a better and different way then the other. Untill now four groups of SARM's with promising properties have been published. These four groups are mentioned in Tabel 1. All these SARM's are androgen receptor agonists with good bonding to the receptor. The SARM-androgen receptor complexes show good anabolic activities in animal tests. They are not yet on the market but they are in the pipe line. S1, S4, C6 and BMS 564929 are presently under clinical trial.








It is clear that the structural formulas of these SARM's do not at all resemble those of anabolic steroids. Nevertheless they give stable complexes with the androgen receptor. Also in these compounds there are functional groups that can form hydrogen bonds and take part in Van der Waals interactions with the side chains of the amino acids that line the inside of the bonding pocket of the androgen receptor. These interactions together lead to bonding of the ligand.


After bonding of the ligand the ligand-androgen receptor complex changes its shape, which induces tissue specifix processes. These processes are in the skin and the prostate different from those in muscles. One of the reasons is that in each tissue different enzymes and cofactors are present. These are collected by the ligand-androgen receptor complex on the DNA and together they transactivate the target genes for proteine synthesis (see Chapter 8, figure 2). The SARM has to be more selective in these processes then the usual synthetic anabolic steroids. The SARM-androgen receptor complex has to initiate just the anabolic effects in the muscles and, for instance, not the androgenic effects in the prostate. In principle this should be possible.


From crystal structure determinations of complexes of steroidal ligands with the ligand bonding domain (LBD) of the androgen receptor we know how these complexes look like on a molecular level, and which interactions play important roles (see Chapter 7). Also the crystal structures of a number of SARM-LBD complexes have been determined. From these structures, scientists can see where the SARM-LBD structures differ from those of the natural and synthetic anabolic steroids.[3] [4] Chemists use this information to optimalize the structure of the SARM and to explain the selectivity of its effects.


The SARM agonists [5] from Table 1 have originated from knowledge about similar types of compounds which are already applied as anti-androgens and as androgen antagonists. Agonists and antagonists [6] for the androgen receptor and anti-androgens [7] have in common that they all bind with the receptor. However, all three types of compounds do this in a slightly different way, so that also the follow up is different. The chemical structure of agonists and antagonists for the same receptor sometimes resemble eachother rather closely.


We will have a closer look to the SARM's that nowadays are under clinical trial. Some members of the group of aryl propionamides are already on the market as anti-androgens. Based on their structures, the SARM's S1, S4, C6 and later S22 are developed. They show good anabolic activity and have only a partly androgenic effect on the prostate. They do suppress the secretion of LH and FSH. Especially C6. shows this effect, and pharmacists consider application of this compound in male contraception.


The propionamide SARM's are orally available, but their halflife time is approximately three hours and that is relatively short. The main metabolic reactions are reduction of the nitro group and hydrolysis of the amides (see Scheme 1). In the second generation compound S22, the nitro group and the halogen atoms or amide group are replaced by cyano groups. These are not metabolically reduced and the halflife time of S22 is about six hours.








Bristol Meyers Squibb has developed a hydantoine type SARM named (7R,7aS) 2-chloro-4 (7-hydroxy-1,3-dioxotetrahydropyrrolo[1,2c]imidazol-2-yl) 3-methyl-benzonitrile, with the codename BMS 564929. [4] The synthesis of BMS 564929 is rather complicated. The right and the left part of the molecule each take five steps. Another three steps are necessary to put the two halves together and to finish the molecule.


BMS 564929 binds well to the androgen receptor and not to the other steroid receptors. BMS 564929 has no interactions with SHBG and it does not inhibit aromatase. Tests with rats show a better anabolic activity then testosterone propionate at the same dose, and a low androgenic activity. At higher doses BMS 564929 does inhibit the hypothalamus and\or the pituary and in this way lowers the secretion of LH and FSH.


An X-ray of the complex of BMS 564929 with the LBD of the androgen receptor shows some differences between BMS 564929 and dihydrotestosterone in their interaction with the LBD of the receptor. These differences seem to be large enough to enable mediation of the anabolic effect in the muscles and not the androgenic effect in the prostate. It is not yet completely clear how to explain all the differences.


BMS 564929 is orally available and metabolic transformations are slower then in the proionamide SARM's. The halflife time varies from eight to fourteen hours, and a low dose is possible.


Critical reviews and comments in the scientific literature generally are positive about SARM's. [8] [9] It is however also clear that more research is necessary.


The anabolic steroids have ended up ultimately in the grey and black zone of doping and designer supplements. Maybe that will happen also with SARM's in the future. There are however a few differences between SARM's and anabolic steroids.


A SARM with high anabolic activity that is attractive for sportsmen and bodybuilders, still has to be found. When this will happen, the makers of designer SARM's and illegal supplements have a problem. It is not that easy to change the structure of a SARM a bit, to enhance its anabolic activity or to circumvent patents. Any minor change in its chemical structure may change an agonist into an antagonist. This last remark should be a warning for chemical sportsmen that are offered designer SARM's. They just as well may have an opposite effect.
 
nunes

nunes

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
OK just received my s4 , should I take this with or without food?
take one dose or multiple during the day?
thanks
 
junkyarddogzz

junkyarddogzz

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
OK just received my s4 , should I take this with or without food?
take one dose or multiple during the day?
thanks
i split mine am and pm, it has a 4 hour half life.
 
Jasen

Jasen

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
wooooooow really no pct needed? can this be used in a pct? or just during session where ur not on a "shut donw" cycle. whats is usuall price if 50mg/ml 30ml//.bottle?
the dose is 150mg per day correct?
 

dpfisher

Guest
Mixed ideas as to whether you can use it in PCT. I wouldn't risk it but a lot of people have said it worked fine. I spent a few hours the other day looking at the studies done on rats, the studies say at about .6mg/kg you should see maximum anabolism and not shutdown significantly. Above that you shouldn't see more positive effects and you should see more shutdown. 150mg/day is too much. You are a big guy, 60-75/day split into 3 doses would probably be best.
 
junkyarddogzz

junkyarddogzz

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
wooooooow really no pct needed? can this be used in a pct? or just during session where ur not on a "shut donw" cycle. whats is usuall price if 50mg/ml 30ml//.bottle?
the dose is 150mg per day correct?
it is being used in PCT....Anthony Roberts is recommending it in all PCTs.


150mg ed is WAY to much.....keep it in the 50mg to 75mgs range......
 
jbryand101b

jbryand101b

Banned
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
well you guys, s4 is one of the sarms that does cause hpta shutdown.
I have it posted in the literature on sarms, and the 5 that have been developed so far.

and it seems all of the sarms developed so far effect hpta on some level or another.

all 4 first generation sarms, and the 1 second generation (though this one seems to be less than the first four)

the sarm that doesn't has yet to be developed.

quoted from the last paragraph from the article above.

"A SARM with high anabolic activity that is attractive for sportsmen and bodybuilders, still has to be found. When this will happen, the makers of designer SARM's and illegal supplements have a problem. It is not that easy to change the structure of a SARM a bit, to enhance its anabolic activity or to circumvent patents. Any minor change in its chemical structure may change an agonist into an antagonist. This last remark should be a warning for chemical sportsmen that are offered designer SARM's. They just as well may have an opposite effect. "
 
junkyarddogzz

junkyarddogzz

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
maybe at extremely high doses....

well you guys, s4 is one of the sarms that does cause hpta shutdown.
I have it posted in the literature on sarms, and the 5 that have been developed so far.

and it seems all of the sarms developed so far effect hpta on some level or another.

all 4 first generation sarms, and the 1 second generation (though this one seems to be less than the first four)

the sarm that doesn't has yet to be developed.

quoted from the last paragraph from the article above.

"A SARM with high anabolic activity that is attractive for sportsmen and bodybuilders, still has to be found. When this will happen, the makers of designer SARM's and illegal supplements have a problem. It is not that easy to change the structure of a SARM a bit, to enhance its anabolic activity or to circumvent patents. Any minor change in its chemical structure may change an agonist into an antagonist. This last remark should be a warning for chemical sportsmen that are offered designer SARM's. They just as well may have an opposite effect. "
 
jbryand101b

jbryand101b

Banned
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
maybe at extremely high doses....
nope. at normal dosages. this is what the literature states. could it be used at low enough dosage to not effect hpta? im sure. will they give you results like most want? probablly not. more like an expensive natural test booster.

seems like right now I can use 40mg of nolva and get the same results as what people have been reporting from s4.
 
junkyarddogzz

junkyarddogzz

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
nope. at normal dosages. this is what the literature states. could it be used at low enough dosage to not effect hpta? im sure. will they give you results like most want? probablly not. more like an expensive natural test booster.

seems like right now I can use 40mg of nolva and get the same results as what people have been reporting from s4.
have you tried the S4, nothing like the nolva...

There are tons of logs over on OLM...go check them out.

Not gonna an argue, but I respectfully totally disagree.
 

AKOG

New member
Awards
0
You need to be doing a pct with this. Regular pct of nolva aand clomid, 4 weeks. Over 30mg a day causes suppression of test up to half original levels. Several logs on other forums with blood tests.
 
Greato

Greato

New member
Awards
0
I love the sarms...I recommend smaller doses split up. Dont go over 100mgs.

I like to keep it in the 50-70mg range
I see this isarm company selling it in a dropper bottle. Have you used it in this form?
 
Greato

Greato

New member
Awards
0
OK just received my s4 , should I take this with or without food?
take one dose or multiple during the day?
thanks
How did you make out with that sarm? I know this thread is ages old.
 

Dragoninho

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
Haha, have fun with 150 mg ed. Did it once... Never again! Was a like a acid trip on mars (oh well, I've never been on mars... Or done acid but you get my drift)

50-75 mg Ed is many times enough for moderate effects. 100 mg has good effects but the vision sides is to harsh for me at that point.

Dose it 3-4 times a day. Smaller doses, several times a day gives me less vision sides.

Don't use IN PCT. You need PCT after this.
 
Greato

Greato

New member
Awards
0
Haha, have fun with 150 mg ed. Did it once... Never again! Was a like a acid trip on mars (oh well, I've never been on mars... Or done acid but you get my drift)

50-75 mg Ed is many times enough for moderate effects. 100 mg has good effects but the vision sides is to harsh for me at that point.

Dose it 3-4 times a day. Smaller doses, several times a day gives me less vision sides.

Don't use IN PCT. You need PCT after this.
Lol, damn. Yeah, not good to mix acid trip type experiences with health and fitness! Would you use SARMS, again? Was it a worthy outcome? Did you use S4 in particular?
How did you make out with that sarm? I know this thread is ages old.
 

Dragoninho

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
Lol, damn. Yeah, not good to mix acid trip type experiences with health and fitness! Would you use SARMS, again? Was it a worthy outcome? Did you use S4 in particular?
I did a couple of cycles with S4 in the past. Both solo and in stacks with aas. This was before the supplement companies started to sell sarms and there wasn't so much info about it back then.

The last years I've used Osta and LGD and I will do a cycle with S4 and probably LGD later on this year.

I use low dose Ostarine (5-10 mg) between cycles with shorter breaks year around.

Don't expect any huge effects of Sarms, but for me it gives increased recovery, possibility to progress A LITTLE BIT faster and I can bounce back quite fast after cycles as well.
 
Greato

Greato

New member
Awards
0
I did a couple of cycles with S4 in the past. Both solo and in stacks with aas. This was before the supplement companies started to sell sarms and there wasn't so much info about it back then.

The last years I've used Osta and LGD and I will do a cycle with S4 and probably LGD later on this year.

I use low dose Ostarine (5-10 mg) between cycles with shorter breaks year around.

Don't expect any huge effects of Sarms, but for me it gives increased recovery, possibility to progress A LITTLE BIT faster and I can bounce back quite fast after cycles as well.
If the progress is only a little bit faster, than it sounds like it is not worth it. ($$) Possible to achieve the same results by working a bit harder? Idk, I always read so many different types of views on supps and end up feeling a bit blurred on certain topics. I guess that's why it might be best to just try things out for ourselves, to get a true understanding of their effects.
 
Greato

Greato

New member
Awards
0
If the progress is only a little bit faster, than it sounds like it is not worth it. ($$) Possible to achieve the same results by working a bit harder? Idk, I always read so many different types of views on supps and end up feeling a bit blurred on certain topics. I guess that's why it might be best to just try things out for ourselves, to get a true understanding of their effects.
It sounds no more effective than adding leucine or bcaa to a regimen. Am I misunderstanding your perception?
 

Dragoninho

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
If the progress is only a little bit faster, than it sounds like it is not worth it. ($$) Possible to achieve the same results by working a bit harder? Idk, I always read so many different types of views on supps and end up feeling a bit blurred on certain topics. I guess that's why it might be best to just try things out for ourselves, to get a true understanding of their effects.
Well, that's your call to make if it's worth it or not.
I'm at that point that I'm happy if I can progress at all. Work harder doesn't help if you don't recover and adapt, you just wear out.


But remember, I'm no bodybuilder and not just a gym bro so what I'm looking for may be different compare to you... I don't care for my results in the gym per se, I just use it to be able to operate at my best in everything else in life.

It's nothing magical with sarms, or other PED 's for that matter.
I could just use low dose test, primo, GH etc and get the effects I want, but right now it's not possible for me to go that route and sarms gives me an alternative. That's it.

I don't know if this was an answer or just blurr ;).
 
Greato

Greato

New member
Awards
0
Well, that's your call to make if it's worth it or not.
I'm at that point that I'm happy if I can progress at all. Work harder doesn't help if you don't recover and adapt, you just wear out.


But remember, I'm no bodybuilder and not just a gym bro so what I'm looking for may be different compare to you... I don't care for my results in the gym per se, I just use it to be able to operate at my best in everything else in life.

It's nothing magical with sarms, or other PED 's for that matter.
I could just use low dose test, primo, GH etc and get the effects I want, but right now it's not possible for me to go that route and sarms gives me an alternative. That's it.

I don't know if this was an answer or just blurr ;).
Haha! Blurry bro, blurry. J/k I understand what you're saying. It's a matter of what a person is attempting to achieve. I have tons of progress to make, still. Maybe a good SARM, will in fact help for me to achieve my goal of hardening up and losing extra body fat. Which one would you advise I take for that? Also, does it effect your mood? And, why PCT if it doesn't effect HPTA?
 
Greato

Greato

New member
Awards
0
Haha! Blurry bro, blurry. J/k I understand what you're saying. It's a matter of what a person is attempting to achieve. I have tons of progress to make, still. Maybe a good SARM, will in fact help for me to achieve my goal of hardening up and losing extra body fat. Which one would you advise I take for that? Also, does it effect your mood? And, why PCT if it doesn't effect HPTA?
I just lt read this:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2907129/

Thanks for your views on this topic, now I see exactly what you're saying.
 

Dragoninho

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
Haha! Blurry bro, blurry. J/k I understand what you're saying. It's a matter of what a person is attempting to achieve. I have tons of progress to make, still. Maybe a good SARM, will in fact help for me to achieve my goal of hardening up and losing extra body fat. Which one would you advise I take for that? Also, does it effect your mood? And, why PCT if it doesn't effect HPTA?
Yes, sorry for that, sometimes I get lost in my own thoughts. ;)

It is definately more potent than amino acids and other supplements! Don't get me wrong, sarms can be very effective and give descent results!
I just want to hold down your expectations. You will not get huge on them but if you have everything else in place you will get stronger, bigger and faster, no question.
But they come with a cost, exactly like other PED's.

And they will affect and supress your hpta, people that say otherwise either lie or got it wrong.

But in my experience it's easier to recover from sarms like osta, S4 than aas. Even LGD it's easier even if I dropped kind a low on test on that cycle.
Probably because sarms don't affect LH and FSH as much as trad. aas.

But a cycle with 20 mg Ostarine, 50 mg S4 and 14-21 mg Cardarine is a solid stack and could be something to try.
Add Super-Dhea or Dermacrine in a small dose and you will have a nice feel good cycle.

Have you cycled anything hormonal before? If not, try just Ostarine and Super-Dhea/Dermacrine and maybe GW (cardarine) the first time and maybe ses S4 to the next cycle.
 
Greato

Greato

New member
Awards
0
Yes, sorry for that, sometimes I get lost in my own thoughts. ;)

It is definately more potent than amino acids and other supplements! Don't get me wrong, sarms can be very effective and give descent results!
I just want to hold down your expectations. You will not get huge on them but if you have everything else in place you will get stronger, bigger and faster, no question.
But they come with a cost, exactly like other PED's.

And they will affect and supress your hpta, people that say otherwise either lie or got it wrong.

But in my experience it's easier to recover from sarms like osta, S4 than aas. Even LGD it's easier even if I dropped kind a low on test on that cycle.
Probably because sarms don't affect LH and FSH as much as trad. aas.

But a cycle with 20 mg Ostarine, 50 mg S4 and 14-21 mg Cardarine is a solid stack and could be something to try.
Add Super-Dhea or Dermacrine in a small dose and you will have a nice feel good cycle.

Have you cycled anything hormonal before? If not, try just Ostarine and Super-Dhea/Dermacrine and maybe GW (cardarine) the first time and maybe ses S4 to the next cycle.
I appreciate the feedback. No, I've never manipulated my hormones. I constantly think about it, but the shutdown prevents me from indulging. Also, I can be a bit tempermental and would not want to exasperate that part of my character at all, possibly during PCT or after. I was looking into the S4, now I see this YK11...there's so much to learn. I just want to make great decisions when it comes to PED's or a anything else, for that matter. Ostarine seems promising.
 
Greato

Greato

New member
Awards
0
I appreciate the feedback. No, I've never manipulated my hormones. I constantly think about it, but the shutdown prevents me from indulging. Also, I can be a bit tempermental and would not want to exasperate that part of my character at all, possibly during PCT or after. I was looking into the S4, now I see this YK11...there's so much to learn. I just want to make great decisions when it comes to PED's or a anything else, for that matter. Ostarine seems promising.
I can see why the stack that you mentioned, would be effective for my goals.
 

Dragoninho

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
I appreciate the feedback. No, I've never manipulated my hormones. I constantly think about it, but the shutdown prevents me from indulging. Also, I can be a bit tempermental and would not want to exasperate that part of my character at all, possibly during PCT or after. I was looking into the S4, now I see this YK11...there's so much to learn. I just want to make great decisions when it comes to PED's or a anything else, for that matter. Ostarine seems promising.
Take your time and do your research. There is no hurry!
But from what you writing I would look into Ostarine, S4 and maybe LGD. Mk677 and Gw (cardarine) is add on´s which could be helpful even if they technical aren´t sarms.


I would be careful with YK (which isn´t a "sarm" either. It´s is a sarm, in the same way as trenbolone is a sarm but you could just call it a aas, just to not get confused..) and RAD-140, especially if you have issues with your temperment. And these ones looks a lot harsher than Osta for instance.



I can see why the stack that you mentioned, would be effective for my goals.
Ease into it. I honestly think that Ostarine and Super Dhea/Dermacrine is a good start to just feel the water. Maybe with GW and MK677 which you can run through your pct.
And later on, you can always go higher in dosage and add in more compounds. But the "Triple Stack" (Osta/S4/Gw) has good reviews and would probably not let you down.

Is *************** a good place to shop?
Don´t know.. as you can see.. ;).
 
Greato

Greato

New member
Awards
0
Take your time and do your research. There is no hurry!
But from what you writing I would look into Ostarine, S4 and maybe LGD. Mk677 and Gw (cardarine) is add on´s which could be helpful even if they technical aren´t sarms.


I would be careful with YK (which isn´t a "sarm" either. It´s is a sarm, in the same way as trenbolone is a sarm but you could just call it a aas, just to not get confused..) and RAD-140, especially if you have issues with your temperment. And these ones looks a lot harsher than Osta for instance.




Ease into it. I honestly think that Ostarine and Super Dhea/Dermacrine is a good start to just feel the water. Maybe with GW and MK677 which you can run through your pct.
And later on, you can always go higher in dosage and add in more compounds. But the "Triple Stack" (Osta/S4/Gw) has good reviews and would probably not let you down.



Don´t know.. as you can see.. ;).
Oops....Got it, man. I appreciate all of the help. I will always start light and head in other directions from there. I will continue to do research and find what suits me best and also keep in mind what you have offered as a good start.
 

rgerhart5

New member
Awards
0
Th
nope. at normal dosages. this is what the literature states. could it be used at low enough dosage to not effect hpta? im sure. will they give you results like most want? probablly not. more like an expensive natural test booster.

seems like right now I can use 40mg of nolva and get the same results as what people have been reporting from s4.
This comment aged well huh hahahaha
 

Similar threads


Top