+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 50

The Future

  1.  09-29-2009  05:05 PM
    Registered User n8te's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Stats
    6'3"  220 lbs.
    Location
    NC!
    Posts
    1,404
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    790

    The Future


    So since there is going to be a ban and most if not all of the PH/DS we know today will be gone soon I've been wondering something: Will there be new developments in this area? Will developers develop new compounds that might be able to get around this new ban we're going to have. OR do you just think that real gear will be the only other option?


    On a sidenote, I find it very disturbing that a bunch of men that are older than dust and clearly don't understand what these compounds are would rather dump all of them instead of restrict their sale.


    If I were to contact my senator about this does anyone think it would do any good? Hell maybe I should do it since I'm a public health major and I'm looking for a job haha. Maybe he'll be open minded enough to work on a bill w/ me? This would be right up my ally



  2.  09-29-2009  05:11 PM
    Registered User rckvl7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Stats
    5'10"  190 lbs.
    Posts
    387
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    241

    I plan to run for senator, vote for me. I have a pro PH/DS/AAS platform. Oh wait, i'm not old enough to run...

    •   


        
       

  3.  09-29-2009  05:19 PM
    Registered User CrazyChemist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Stats
    5'9"  184 lbs.
    Location
    Hartford CT
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,363
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1532

    Yeah write your senator. I mean I wouldn't come out as pro-anything illegal or admit to using anything illegal but as long as you are inside the confines of the law then go for it. I'm sure new cmpds will come out. Unless they change the FDAs jurisdiction, i.e. may dietary supplements found in nature fall under FDA approval, it'll take awhile before they ban everything.
    Back.... for real this time

  4.  09-29-2009  05:29 PM
    Registered User n8te's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Stats
    6'3"  220 lbs.
    Location
    NC!
    Posts
    1,404
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    790

    No I won't come off as pro steroid/DS/PH I really just want a chance to talk to him and her and see what they think of the whole situation or if they think anything at all abt it. I really wish that Senator Dole was still in but she was voted out after last term. I have a close family friend that worked for her personally for years. O well I'll just have to see what I can do.

    My view is that if enough people try to push restrictions over total ban then maybe we can still get what we want. It won't be easy though

  5.  09-29-2009  06:14 PM
    Registered User sethroberts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    40
    Posts
    863
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    589

    Originally Posted by n8te View Post
    No I won't come off as pro steroid/DS/PH I really just want a chance to talk to him and her and see what they think of the whole situation or if they think anything at all abt it. I really wish that Senator Dole was still in but she was voted out after last term. I have a close family friend that worked for her personally for years. O well I'll just have to see what I can do.

    My view is that if enough people try to push restrictions over total ban then maybe we can still get what we want. It won't be easy though
    From what I am hearing, they are going to make it difficult to circumvent the law this time around -- that doesn't mean people won't try -- but they will be risking an awful lot. You know, there are other pathways besides the androgen receptor that result in skeletal muscle anabolism, right?

  6.  09-29-2009  06:18 PM
    Registered User rckvl7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Stats
    5'10"  190 lbs.
    Posts
    387
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    241

    Originally Posted by sethroberts View Post
    From what I am hearing, they are going to make it difficult to circumvent the law this time around -- that doesn't mean people won't try -- but they will be risking an awful lot. You know, there are other pathways besides the androgen receptor that result in skeletal muscle anabolism, right?
    Actually to me it seemed like the only change they might make to the laws is make it easier for the DEA to schedule stuff as steroids. Other than that its mainly the FDA/DEA increasing enforcement of current laws, by way of more resources from congress.

  7.  09-29-2009  06:22 PM
    Registered User sethroberts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    40
    Posts
    863
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    589

    Originally Posted by rckvl7 View Post
    Actually to me it seemed like the only change they might make to the laws is make it easier for the DEA to schedule stuff as steroids. Other than that its mainly the FDA/DEA increasing enforcement of current laws, by way of more resources from congress.
    But if you are a manufacturer and you buy the raw materials for 10,000 bottles and suddenly they schedule it overnight then not only are you at a loss for the raw materials but now you are in possession of a ****load of schedule 3 controlled substance with intent to distribute.

  8.  09-29-2009  06:25 PM
    Registered User Zero V's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Stats
    5'10"  163 lbs.
    Location
    Under Gods grace
    Age
    26
    Posts
    6,276
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    3470

    Originally Posted by sethroberts View Post
    But if you are a manufacturer and you buy the raw materials for 10,000 bottles and suddenly they schedule it overnight then not only are you at a loss for the raw materials but now you are in possession of a ****load of schedule 3 controlled substance with intent to distribute.
    wow, very good point.

  9.  09-29-2009  07:06 PM
    Registered User Liftingstud's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Age
    32
    Posts
    2,102
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1180

    After watching the hears it so sad... They act like this a huge huge public safety risk. What about smoking? That not only hurts the smoker but others around it... Yes more and more restrictions r being placed. What about alcohol? Thousands and thousands of college students bing drink... Drink and drive, putting others at risk. Then there is the growing obesity problem with more and more children struggling with weight issues at an early age... This is not only a major health risk but with rising cost if health care it will increase further. What about the hormones and chemicals added to the plants and animals we eat? These are the major health risks of our country. Not a few designer steroids... If only the government was just as quick to act on these other issues maybe we could save our country.

    I could rant for hours but u get me... Sorry for ranting.

  10.  09-29-2009  07:06 PM
    Banned bigmoe65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Stats
    5'5"   lbs.
    Posts
    764
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    0

    Originally Posted by sethroberts View Post
    But if you are a manufacturer and you buy the raw materials for 10,000 bottles and suddenly they schedule it overnight then not only are you at a loss for the raw materials but now you are in possession of a ****load of schedule 3 controlled substance with intent to distribute.
    When I listened to the hearings today one of the guys giving testimony was very hesitent on doing that. He basically said its a long process to schedule a drug.

  11.  09-29-2009  08:15 PM
    Registered User n8te's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Stats
    6'3"  220 lbs.
    Location
    NC!
    Posts
    1,404
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    790

    Originally Posted by sethroberts View Post
    From what I am hearing, they are going to make it difficult to circumvent the law this time around -- that doesn't mean people won't try -- but they will be risking an awful lot. You know, there are other pathways besides the androgen receptor that result in skeletal muscle anabolism, right?
    I'm gonna sound like a complete tool bag right now but off the top of my head I can't really think of any other way.

    But yea they are gonna make it more hard to get around and from what it sounds like make it so the FDA and DEA have more power at their disposal.


    Neither of which I agree with.

  12.  09-29-2009  09:54 PM
    Registered User hard iron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Stats
    5'7"  195 lbs.
    Location
    Indian Country
    Posts
    465
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    560

    can't companies still play around and tinker with the chemical name and design a whole new substance of their own and name it. Is this something we will possibly see in the future?

  13.  09-29-2009  10:44 PM
    Registered User Smiley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Stats
    5'11"  180 lbs.
    Posts
    345
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    228

    Originally Posted by sethroberts View Post
    From what I am hearing, they are going to make it difficult to circumvent the law this time around -- that doesn't mean people won't try -- but they will be risking an awful lot. You know, there are other pathways besides the androgen receptor that result in skeletal muscle anabolism, right?
    But are they as cheap or effective? Ive seen a lot of these products and most of them are just hype.

  14.  09-29-2009  11:07 PM
    Registered User lyfespan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Stats
    6'0"  188 lbs.
    Location
    cucamonga
    Age
    38
    Posts
    1,124
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    772

    I can see about gaining forum with a senator in my area, i have scum, i mean sum politcal friends

  15.  09-30-2009  01:21 AM
    Sponsor Grambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Stats
    5'11"  188 lbs.
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,380
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    533059

    subbed for discussion.

    Seth is right on both posts, specifically the one about what would happen to companies who make new stuff and then get it scheduled.
    Head Purus Labs Rep
    www.Puruslabs.net

  16.  09-30-2009  05:28 AM
    Registered User sethroberts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    40
    Posts
    863
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    589

    Originally Posted by hard iron View Post
    can't companies still play around and tinker with the chemical name and design a whole new substance of their own and name it. Is this something we will possibly see in the future?
    If it is steroidal and androgenic, it will likely be illegal.

  17.  09-30-2009  05:34 AM
    Registered User sethroberts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    40
    Posts
    863
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    589

    Originally Posted by Smiley View Post
    But are they as cheap or effective? Ive seen a lot of these products and most of them are just hype.
    Cheap is an issue -- stuff like GH and IGF-1 are effective but expensive as hell. Insulin is effective but is relatively dangerous and not as effective on its own. A lot of the more exotic peptides are of course expensive. As I have mentioned in other posts, steroids are not as effective as some people believe them to be. The belief that a 20 pound gain in 2 or three weeks is "real" needs to go away. Real lean tissue gains come at a max of 1 to 2 pounds per week. If you accept that fact then you are looking at 5-10 pounds of muscle in a 4 to 8 week cycle maybe 15 pounds in a longer cycle. Some of the legal products out there now can produce gains of a quarter or half of this amount (maybe 5 pounds in 8 weeks).

  18.  09-30-2009  05:43 AM
    Banned jakellpet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Stats
    6'2"  213 lbs.
    Location
    LHJO-ville
    Age
    39
    Posts
    5,536
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    0

    subbed to quality discussion

  19.  09-30-2009  07:18 AM
    Registered User RSR36's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Stats
    5'11"  211 lbs.
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    43
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    71

    SARMS, MYOSTATIN INHIBITORS, PEPTIDES and let's not forget the good "old school" hormones. It's easy to get all of them.

  20.  09-30-2009  12:23 PM
    Registered User n8te's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Stats
    6'3"  220 lbs.
    Location
    NC!
    Posts
    1,404
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    790

    Originally Posted by lyfespan View Post
    I can see about gaining forum with a senator in my area, i have scum, i mean sum politcal friends
    do it.

    what you should do is see if some of these friends can find information about how many of these old law makers are on TRT or HRT

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 38
    Last Post: 04-08-2008, 09:33 PM
  2. PCT in the future???
    By srx600 in forum Post Cycle Therapy
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-22-2007, 09:44 PM
  3. The FUTURE
    By sean taylor in forum Applied Nutriceuticals
    Replies: 102
    Last Post: 04-27-2007, 07:35 PM
  4. the future
    By comrade in forum General Chat
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-31-2004, 11:46 PM

Tags for this Thread