Cyanostane? (2-cyano-17a-methyl-17b-hydroxy-androst-3-one)
-
09-08-2009 09:29 AM
Registered User
-
09-08-2009 09:34 AM
Registered User
Sorry, I didn't see this thread:
cynostane
-
09-08-2009 03:55 PM
Registered User
My log is underway starting today. Update to come tonight:
Trauma1's "Cynostane" Log (Sponsored by AI!)
Evolutionary Muse - Inspire to Evolve
Legendary
-
09-08-2009 07:20 PM
Registered User
But read the bb.com at 3rd page: the compound tha PA was talking about, that was 800/45 a/a ratio, is another one: finishing with 2-ene (the a-43 on vida), and the cynostane is 3-one (the a42 on vida), that is something about 60 anabolic and about 20androgenic
-
09-09-2009 07:27 AM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
anbes
But read the bb.com at 3rd page: the compound tha PA was talking about, that was 800/45 a/a ratio, is another one: finishing with 2-ene (the a-43 on vida), and the cynostane is 3-one (the a42 on vida), that is something about 60 anabolic and about 20androgenic
Is it listed in vida? Are you sure it only has 60/20. Thats extremly low, lower than h-drol.
-
09-09-2009 09:53 AM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
anbes
But read the bb.com at 3rd page: the compound tha PA was talking about, that was 800/45 a/a ratio, is another one: finishing with 2-ene (the a-43 on vida), and the cynostane is 3-one (the a42 on vida), that is something about 60 anabolic and about 20androgenic
I think cyanostane isn't A-42 (a42 have a 1-ene, and cyanostane have not 1-ene)
-
09-09-2009 11:29 AM
Registered User
It is not listed in Vida.
Evolutionary Muse - Inspire to Evolve
Legendary
-
09-09-2009 11:45 AM
Sponsor
Originally Posted by
Trauma1
It is not listed in Vida.
Sorry to say, that both compounds in question ARE listed in Vida.. in fact, anything you get today is just bastardized from Vida.
-
09-09-2009 11:50 AM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
DAdams91982
Sorry to say, that both compounds in question ARE listed in Vida.. in fact, anything you get today is just bastardized from Vida.
Please post the VIDA number, cause I don't see it either. It should be an "A" listing.
-
09-09-2009 11:58 AM
Sponsor
Originally Posted by
GotTest
Please post the VIDA number, cause I don't see it either. It should be an "A" listing.
I dont have VIDA here at work. I am sure someone here has it on hand.. the nomenclatures are different, but same compounds.
-
09-09-2009 12:02 PM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
JBerto
I think cyanostane isn't A-42 (a42 have a 1-ene, and cyanostane have not 1-ene)
I agree.
Definitely NOT A-42.
-
09-09-2009 12:03 PM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
DAdams91982
I dont have VIDA here at work. I am sure someone here has it on hand.. the nomenclatures are different, but same compounds.
I've looked through VIDA for a couple days and can't find it.
Maybe someone can get the number from PA.
-
09-09-2009 12:03 PM
Sponsor
Originally Posted by
DAdams91982
I dont have VIDA here at work. I am sure someone here has it on hand.. the nomenclatures are different, but same compounds.
The bold doesn't make sense, you mean it is just written different? It is easy to look at nomenclature and compare it and the ones that are listed don't match up from what I can tell.
No one has found it that I have seen just yet and at this point I would figure someone would.
-
09-09-2009 12:08 PM
Sponsor
Originally Posted by
Grambo
The bold doesn't make sense, you mean it is just written different? It is easy to look at nomenclature and compare it and the ones that are listed don't match up from what I can tell.
No one has found it that I have seen just yet and at this point I would figure someone would.
Written differently... wrong choice of words.
-
09-09-2009 12:11 PM
Sponsor
Actually.... I am unsubbing... i didnt want to get caught in all the drama in the first place!
Damn me and my big mouth.
-
09-09-2009 12:11 PM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
GotTest
I've looked through VIDA for a couple days and can't find it.
Maybe someone can get the number from PA.
PA has said in bb.com the nomenclature seem to be incomplete.
Anyway, some guy at bb.com has said he will send to PA some capsules to test it.
Any AI Reps here?
BTW, due to the FDA persecution of all hormonals supps, maybe AI has chosen launch it "silently", and they wan't say that compound is listed on an "evil book that list roids" (Vida's book) to "hide it"
-
09-09-2009 12:44 PM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
JBerto
PA has said in bb.com the nomenclature seem to be incomplete.
I've said that too. I can only assume by the product name (stane) that it's 5a-reduced. If that is the case, it's 2-cyano-17a-methyl-DHT.
If he is implying that the nomenclature is missing a double-bond (-ene), then without testing it, he's probably just guessing...
-
09-09-2009 08:50 PM
Registered User
I can understand doing this silently but I`d really like to know more about this compound. I had some extra $$ so I stocked up on M Drol, Havoc, Phera, etc. I have about 20 assorted bottles and I don`t want to buy something new if it`s very similar to something I already have.
-
09-10-2009 12:28 AM
Registered User
Thats the problem, the lesser ones are similar in level of effect, no one wants a mediocre compound unless its their first run. The last better than mediocre compound was 19-Norandrosta it was a variant of 19-Norandrodiol (which was even better). So the question is; will this be better than that and SD or will it be just as good as the "not so great" ones?
-
09-10-2009 07:36 AM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
JBerto
PA has said in bb.com the nomenclature seem to be incomplete.
This is my belief too.
Similar Forum Threads
-
By Husker89 in forum Anabolics
Replies: 23
Last Post: 10-29-2012, 06:08 PM
-
By Husker89 in forum Supplement Reviews / Logs
Replies: 1
Last Post: 11-07-2011, 10:29 PM
-
By ROLLBAR in forum Anabolics
Replies: 4
Last Post: 01-22-2009, 01:41 PM
-
By Link24 in forum Supplements
Replies: 3
Last Post: 08-31-2007, 03:56 PM
-
By santiago10 in forum Supplements
Replies: 0
Last Post: 01-08-2007, 04:56 PM
Tags for this Thread