From what I've read from PA and the other big giant heads, SDrol is by far the most potent oral. Stronger than Decabolan, Hdrol, PP and Epi by a long shot.
I have a link to it.
Superdrol is by far the strongest oral steroid in production, except for the exceptions of M1T, Methyltrienolone, and Bolasterone (which can't be found).
These other oral AAS might be stronger on paper, but as usual, the real world results often speak differently.
First of all, both of the most common and powerfull well known black market oral AAS (Dianabol and Anadrol) are out of the question. They are not as strong as SD is on paper and do not give the same degree of lean tissue build up. This will be obvious when viewing real world average result comparisons.
Secondly, M1t may be more anabolic on paper, but does not give greater lean tissue gains than SD in the typical user. An equal amount of weight may be gained, but much of it is water with M1T. As far as strength gains go, as is common with DHT based AAS, it gives much greater strength gains when compared with M1T. Quite simply, SD is one of the most powerfull strength inducing AAS in the world, and it does this without the usual synergistic effect of water retention in most of the strongest strength inducing AAS. In fact, properly compounded SD does the opposite. It acts as a diuretic and pulls water out from under the skin and the rest of the body; the is partly responsible for the hard, dense look one obtains with SD use.
Often, tremendous results in strength can be obtained with SD by supplying the missing link for optimal strength development, aromitizing AAS resulting in water retention. SD gives it's strength inducing effects wholly by muscle fiber strength increases, which shows just how powerfull this steroid actually is for strength development. Probably the best, but also incredibly toxic strength combinations, would be SD stacked with Anadrol. The second best alternative, if only 2 steroids were chosen, would be testoterone. By far, a combination of SD, Anadrol, Halotestin (about to die right about now, lol) Trenbolone and Testosterone would give the best strength gains anyone could ever hope to experience. Within 2-3 weeks strength would skyrocket (if rapid strength increases ever lead to injury, this would do it). I'm a little off track here, let me get out of dream world.
When comparing SD to Methyltrienolone, I believe there is too little feedback about this liver killing AAS (M-tren) to be able to render an accurate comparison. I've heard that strength gains are very good with M-tren, but that the size gains are lacking when compared to SD. I believe that for M-tren to equal SD in any respect, it would have to be dosed at levels that are beyond reasonable safety guidelines. Unfotunately, we just can't take enough of this excedingly powwerfull AAs for long enough, or in high enough dosages, in order to reap maximum benefit.
Bolasterone, one of the most potently anabolic and androgenic oral steroids ever produced. There are a few oral AAs that are about as anabolic as Bolasterone, but none as potently androgenic. This steroid, unlike most AAS that favor either anabolism or androgenicity, is very potent in both respects. It was produced a few decades ago, but production stopped in the eighties. Ridden with side effects, but highly desired, this streoid gave incredible results. Unfortunately, there are few people around still posting or telling there stories in the open, concerning their personal results with this steroid. It might be a good idea to open up a thread about this AAS in order to get the answers I and others, desire. I cannot compare SD against Bolasterone for this very reason. Paper says one thing, but real world results often say another.
There are other obscure streoids of great potency (and often toxocity)that have been analyzed and brought to life on paper, but never produced, therefore, they cannot fairly enter the discussion.
Ok, now that we have compared SD to the other comparable oral AAS that are or were in production, what type of results are average with SD when compared against the most common, and regarded to be the strongest, oral steroids.
I have attempted to put down dosing guidelines (not necessarily length of cycle) that were considered to be at the reasonable upper end for all of these AAS, in order to be fair.
Dosing guidelines.
SD: 30-40 mg/day for 30 days.
Anadrol: 100 mg/day for 30 days.
D-bol: 60 mg/day for 30 days.
SD: Average total weight gains are between 12-17lb's.
Anadrol: Average total weight gains are between 15-20 lb's.
D-bol: Average total weight gains are between 12-17 lb's.
Ok...lets break those numbers down a little bit into actual muscle fiber gained.
Obviously, and undisputably, the weight gain from Anadrol is largely dependent on water weight gain. Possibly upwards of half the weight gained with Anadrol is due to fluid retention. This is shown to be the case by appaerance as well as the rapid loss of weight that occurs when this AAS is discontinued. It may be safe to assume that a 20 lb weight gain with Anadrol is probably only leaving the user with somewhere between 10-12 lb's of actual muscle fiber growth. It may even be less, being that usually more weight is lost post-cycle with Anadrol than %50. Anadrol recieves a rating of only 10-12 lb's of actual muscle fiber growth.
Dianabol; the same is true of this steroid, but to a lesser degree. Still, none the less, much of the weight gained with D-bol is atributed to water retention brought on by conversion to estradiol, as well as an imbalnce of electrolytes that results in additional water weight gain. Much is lost post-cycle. If 15 lb's is gained with D-bol over this 30 day period, propbably about 8-10 lb's of this is actual muscle fiber growth. D-bol is left with a standing number of 8-10 lb's of real muscle gained.
Superdrol, the king...
Alright, SD often leaves users with 12-17 lb's on only 30 mg/day, sometimes less than 30 mg. In addition, and highly relevant, is the fact that SD actually dries the user out on-cycle, resulting in more muscle fiber gain than the scale implies. This is in direct contradiction to Anadrol and D-bol, wher actual muscle fiber gained is less than what the scale shows.
If an individual gains 17 lb's on-cycle in 30 days (which is common); the individual has probably also lost about 3-5 lb's of water weight due to SD's diuretic effects. This effect is blantantly obvious, and has been in observance since the initial tresting. No other conclusion can be drawn other than the individual has indeed lost water weight on-cycle, which directly implies that a 17 lb weight gain is more like a 20-22 lb weight gain. Yes, these numbers seen almost too hard to believe, but they are proven everyday in the real world. Again, these gains take place everyday around the country and the diuretic effect is undeniable. Most of the drying out effects occur during the first week, but often 4-7 lb's is still gained during those first seven days.
It is clear that neither D-bol or anadrol can touch the muscle building effects of SD when reasonable doses are used.
As far as strength goes, I am getting tired, but I will just say this. Sd is stronger than D-bol and at least comparable to Anadrol. Again, SD does this with NO water retention, which suggests highly that it's strength gains are wholly muscle fiber dependent. The same cannot be said of Anadrol. Also, this fact is confirmed post-cycle when Anadrol's strength gains plummet, but SD's are maintained rather well. I have personally gained 65 lb's on my one rep bench press in 30 days with SD. Amazing!
Goodnight to all.
One more thing. HEAVY, you need to try SD. If you can tolerate it, you will experience some of the fastest gains of your life. Eat like a horse and you will grow very quickly. You must eat more than when on test, as you have a short window of time to capitolize on SD's rapid muscle fiber build up. otherwise, you will cut yourself short. Because cycle are so short with SD and the gains come so fast, calories need to be increased constantly.
. Still, getting anything from 25mg, is a really good response! I'm surprised, as most people are still running 75.
