- 02-13-2004, 09:59 PM
- 02-13-2004, 10:01 PM
Originally Posted by Hellhound
- 02-13-2004, 10:10 PM
02-14-2004, 12:34 AM
Hopefully will be able to ship out some betas on Friday the 20th. No pricing info yet so dont ask, Ill have more info by wed.
02-14-2004, 01:42 AM
02-14-2004, 02:44 PM
Props to Sldge for getting mentioned in the new Muscular Development. His name is mentioned as well as his Designer Supps for the methyl products. They discuss M4AD, M1T, and Methyldienolone.
02-14-2004, 03:26 PM
02-14-2004, 03:37 PM
02-14-2004, 04:30 PM
02-14-2004, 04:42 PM
02-14-2004, 04:53 PM
02-14-2004, 04:59 PM
Yeah, the guy who wrote the article said a lot of companies wouldn't put their name out. The only three that did were legalgear, designersupps, and kilosports. It mentions the Biden bill also. As for the issue, yeah, it's the one that just came out. Probably not at newsstands yet, subscriptions come a few weeks early.
02-14-2004, 05:01 PM
02-14-2004, 05:03 PM
02-14-2004, 05:28 PM
02-14-2004, 05:47 PM
is there any way to ban anyone who ackowledges that they are under 20 years old?
at least from the prohormone and steroid sections of the forum.
this will make AM atleast a notch higher in quality
02-14-2004, 05:54 PM
02-14-2004, 06:38 PM
02-14-2004, 08:49 PM
"is there any way to ban anyone who ackowledges that they are under 20 years old?
at least from the prohormone and steroid sections of the forum.
this will make AM atleast a notch higher in quality"
What does age have anything to do with knowledge? I know plenty of sub 20 year olds who know more about bb'ing than the average middle age bench press wonder.
02-14-2004, 10:05 PM
02-14-2004, 10:42 PM
Great, Like that title alone isnt going to add fuel to the fire. Not only is it insinuating the fact that there are current products that should be classified but arent, it now gives the jits a better idea of where to find these products. It will definitly come back to haunt us all.Originally Posted by Beelzebub
Beelzebud, give us a breakdown of the article.
02-15-2004, 01:32 AM
02-15-2004, 02:48 AM
Starts out by saying the estimate of prohormone legality will be between 12-18 months before the Biden bill becomes law. It describes how methylating compounds will change the effectiveness of the drug and how the carbon 17 makes the liver work that much harder. He states his opinion how he believes the severity of methylated hormones is way overblown by the medical community and insults the beer drinking, cigarette smoking, and tylenol popping community. Designersupps gets mentioned with "Matt the Sledgehammer". "Without their help, I could not be bringing you all this information at this time." Then M4AD, M1T and methyldienolone are broken down and explained with methyldienolone being exclaimed as the shiznitz with as little as 3mg a day. Compares methyldienolone to a winstrol/parabolan stack of 50mg each. Mentions kilosports selling it right now and that Gaspari and Gennapharm will be selling it soon. He does state that taking more than one methyl at a time is bad news. It closes with "We really have reached a golden age with regard to prohormones/prosteroids and I will miss them when they are eventually banned. Stock up on them now while they are still legal because we are about to enter into a very dark and ominous period for freedom of choice, freedom to decide what you want to put in, or keep out of, your own body."
Pretty much it, mostly the same info we read on here all the time. Nothing new to us, but the magazine definately highlights it to everyone else who was oblivious to the methyls.
02-15-2004, 01:14 PM
let me clarify,Originally Posted by hypo
They can be in other parts of the forum but not in the prohormone or steroid section if they are under twenty and ask stupid questions.
Is there anything wrong with this idea?
02-15-2004, 02:53 PM
I dunno man, I can see both sides of the story. Banning them from the sections will make them more curious and more anxious to try it. I know if that **** happened to me, I'd be like "well, this must be some kick ass ****". So, IMO, it's better to guide them through it for health reasons otherwise they'll be looking up to the bellicose's and axehole's for critique.
02-15-2004, 03:54 PM
here's the thing though:
who care what happens to them?
its not hurting you is it?
and if they ask smart questions and postpone use they would be allowed to stay.
if they get banned from the prohormone/steroid sections, they can get a new username and act properly next time
02-15-2004, 05:20 PM
true, while they're health isn't a major concern to me, it is to the FDA and government and all those guys. any problems ppl have with these drugs will probably be reported in one way or another and help assist the ban. hell, out of 17 million users of ephedra over the course of a decade, it only took about 150 incidents to ban it forever. so, in that way, it concerns me.
02-15-2004, 05:45 PM
BANNING PEOPLE FROM CERTAIN BOARDS AND INFO ISNT GOING TO CHANGE ANYTHING. LETS GET OVER THAT HOLE IDEA.
02-15-2004, 06:03 PM
it is whole db..
and thought he age limit on certain forums does have merit, 1st it is not practical to do and 2nd it does make the curiosity issue come up... but at the same time, we at the mod team have noticed the amount of asinine posts and are attempting to take steps to control them.. this is for the benefit of all the members of the board. Offending members take notice, please for your sake I hope you have been listening when you were warned by other members or members of the mod team...
02-15-2004, 07:50 PM
02-16-2004, 03:33 AM
02-17-2004, 09:02 AM
02-17-2004, 11:39 AM
Banning the under 21 crowd would at least have the appearance that we're taking our own measures to protect the "innocent". But I do understand what you're all saying..it's better to qwell curiosity in a positive manner rather than producing more axeholes by allowing misinformation to be spread (although we can't stop stupidity, just can't)...all in all it's too late in the game to worrying about it.
02-17-2004, 04:30 PM
there is no feasible way to check age over the internet. And to think it would make a difference in law makers eyes is very wishful thinking at best.
02-17-2004, 06:34 PM
i agree, BUT if an individual acts stupid and ADMITS he's under 20....
two conditions: stupidity and underage.
You are allowed to break only one but not both.
my 2 cents
02-17-2004, 08:02 PM
02-18-2004, 01:08 PM
02-18-2004, 01:53 PM
You know what I find quite hilarous is?
The fact that all this crying about banning underage persons is mainly coming from someone with the screen name "ps24eva". Huuuummmmmm, let me think for a second..... "ps2" wouldnt perhaps stand for "Playstation two" now would it? and the fact that "4eva" stands for "forever" is kinda funny as well. Now let me rephrase this, someone with the screen name "playstation two forever" is complaining about underage members. I think thats pretty weird since most hardcore Videogamers are underage. Maybe your just not the average adult or maybe your a minor with a guilty heart trying to take the crosshairs off your ass before they get a chance to get there. Interesting anyway you look at it.
This thread has nothing to do with underage posting so unless you want to be fingered out I suggest to drop the ****ing subject and stick to the original topic at hand!
02-19-2004, 11:21 AM
02-19-2004, 02:55 PM
Im not under 21 but if you ban all of them, then how are they supposed to learn?Originally Posted by ps24eva
Similar Forum Threads
- By Sldge in forum AnabolicsReplies: 45Last Post: 04-22-2005, 09:50 PM
- By morfiend in forum AnabolicsReplies: 139Last Post: 06-02-2004, 08:18 PM
- By SeanC1123 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 10Last Post: 02-27-2004, 07:54 PM
- By rhatid in forum AnabolicsReplies: 44Last Post: 02-26-2004, 10:32 PM
- By muscles4life in forum AnabolicsReplies: 5Last Post: 02-24-2004, 09:00 PM