i-Force Protodrol

Page 1 of 3 123 Last
  1. i-Force Protodrol


    Protodrol



    PROTODROL ? iFORCE Nutrition?s newest innovation in performance enhancing designer anabolics. Protodrol was specifically engineered to maximize myotrophic activity resulting in notable changes to one?s physique faster than ever before. Protodrol marks the beginning of a new era of size, strength, recovery and endurance. You will experience rapid increases in muscle fullness and vascularity, while simultaneously reducing body fat.
    The hypertropic effects of Protodrol are extremely dry and lean because it cannot aromatize into estrogen. It has also been shown to have no progestenic activity. So with no exogenous estrogen of prolactin activity, concerns like gynecomastia, puffy, or bloated gains won't be a concern for even the most sensitive users! Plus, you see dramatic changes to energy levels, rate of fat loss, and a huge jump in libido!
    Protodrol is extremely safe and is the only commercially available methylated compound that will not raise liver Bilirubin levels. Bilirubin, usually excreted in bile, is the pigment responsible for the ?yellowing? of Jaundice and other liver ailments. Although no methylated product can claim zero liver toxicity, Protodrol is the closest of any product on the market.
    Protodrol is the ideal prohormone for someone who is ready to step up to the level of designer anabolics, and wants to do so without worrying about side effects such as liver damage, gynecomastia, bloating, or testicular atrophy. Stacking Protodrol with your next cycle will increase your gains in size and strength, without adding to any of the compound?s negative effects. Take your training and physique to the next level. Experience mind blowing pumps, intense weight gain, and massive strength gains in 4 weeks or less with Protodrol!




    Protodrol's Nomenclature:
    17a-methyl-5a-androst-17b-ol








    The quoted study below is in reference to Protodrol's unique characteristic. It will not raise liver Bilirubin levels, even at 20mg/kg of bodyweight, thats 1,800mg/day for a 200lbs man!
    However, many who read this full study will note that this was performed on rabbits, not humans. As can be seen in "29" in this article, 200mg/day was given to humans, and no rise in Bilirubin levels were observed.









    This image has been resized. Click this bar to view the full image. The original image is sized 833x384 and weights 51KB.





    What are Bilirubin levels and why is it safer to keep them low?

    Bilirubin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


    Quote:
    Bilirubin (formerly referred to as hematoidin) is the yellow breakdown product of normal heme catabolism. Heme is found in hemoglobin, a principal component of red blood cells. Bilirubin is excreted in bile, and its levels are elevated in certain diseases. It is responsible for the yellow color of bruises and the yellow discoloration in jaundice.

    Quote:
    Unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia in a neonate can lead to accumulation of bilirubin in certain brain regions, a phenomenon known as kernicterus, with consequent irreversible damage to these areas manifesting as various neurological deficits, seizures, abnormal reflexes and eye movements. The neurotoxicity of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia manifests because the blood-brain barrier has yet to develop fully, and bilirubin can freely pass into the brain interstitium, whereas more developed individuals with increased bilirubin in the blood are protected. Aside from specific chronic medical conditions that may lead to hyperbilirubinaemia, neonates in general are at increased risk since they lack the intestinal bacteria that facilitate the breakdown and excretion of conjugated bilirubin in the feces (this is largely why the feces of a neonate are paler than those of an adult). Instead the conjugated bilirubin is converted back into the unconjugated form by the enzyme β-glucuronidase and a large proportion is reabsorbed through the enterohepatic circulation.


    What can I expect from Protodrol?

    Protodrol can be used for either cutting or extremely lean bulking cycles. Users can expect gains of 10-15lbs of pure LBM gains while using Protodrol to bulk, and can expect 5-10lbs of pure LBM gains while simultaneously losing 1-4% bodyfat while cutting. A large rise in libido as well as a STRONG "alpha-male" mentality can be felt while on Protodrol ensuring gains are not only in the gym, but in all aspects of your day...especially the bedroom! Big gains dont have to come with a low libido! Get the best of both worlds with Protodrol.



    Who should use Protodrol?

    Protodrol is meant to be used by male adults aged 21 and over. If you are under 21, this product is not for you.

    Protodrol can be used when you have reached a major plateau, desire intense lean muscle gain, want to have the most successful cut of your life, or are looking to shatter every personal record you've ever set in the gym!

    How do I run Protodrol?


    Protodrol has 60 pills per box/bottle, dosed at 25mg/cap. This enables users to run a full 50mg/day for 30 days from only 1 box!


    Running Protodrol on its own

    Weeks 1-4(6): Protodrol @ 2/day - 1 pill every 12 hours, Testabolan V @ 4/day
    Weeks 5-8: Reversitol @ 3/2/2/1, Testabolan V2 @ 4/day


    Running Protodrol with a "base"

    Weeks 1-4: Bold200 @ 600-800mg/day - 1-2 pill spaced evenly throughout the day, Protodrol @ 2day(both pills taken 45-60 minutes pre-wo), Testabolan V2 @ 4/day
    Weeks 5-8: Bold200 @ 600-800mg/day, Testabolan V2 @ 4/day
    Weeks 9-12: Reversitol @ 3/2/2/1, Testabolan V2 @ 4/day


    YOU MUST RUN POST CYCLE THERAPY(REVERSITOL) AFTER USING PROTODROL. IT IS A POTENT DESIGNER ANABOLIC THAT IS CAPABLE OF SLOWING OR SHUTTING DOWN ONES NATURAL HORMONE PRODUCTION, SO PCT(POST CYCLE THERAPY) IS A 100% MUST. ONE CAN USE REVERSITOL AS SHOWN ABOVE, OR A SERM SUCH AS CLOMID OR NOLVADEX.


  2. Yeah, here's the original thread:
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/i-for...otodrol-q.html

    They admittedly jumped the gun on this one. I read on another forum that they're having some production issues with this substance.
    RTR.
    •   
       


  3. is it out yet? haven't seen it anywhere

  4. Quote Originally Posted by rubberring View Post
    Yeah, here's the original thread:
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/i-for...otodrol-q.html

    They admittedly jumped the gun on this one. I read on another forum that they're having some production issues with this substance.
    Seems very interesting, esp with what PA said about it.

  5. So this is Pretty Androgenic then? Since Methyltestosterone A/A is 94-130/115-150
    •   
       


  6. U have it backwards for MT the anabolic/androgenic, so it would be 115-150/94-130 putting it's Q at ~1... And if PA is correct he says this compound is 1.8x anabolic and 1.0x androgenic, so we are looking at:
    207-270/94-130 putting the Q at ~1.8

  7. I noticed a similarity to Pheraplex



    Idk about their claims though... You can't say that it won't cause gyno in even the most senstive users, Havoc/Epi is supposed to cure gyno and still sometimes will cause it. You can't have a product that adds 15 pounds of muscle without the sides. You can't have the best of both worlds.
    Mostly answered PM's
    Don't post on my profile, I don't read that stuff, PM me instead
    <------ Hard to believe, but I wasn't on any anabolics in the avatar shot

  8. Quote Originally Posted by UnrealMachine View Post
    I noticed a similarity to Pheraplex



    Idk about their claims though... You can't say that it won't cause gyno in even the most senstive users, Havoc/Epi is supposed to cure gyno and still sometimes will cause it. You can't have a product that adds 15 pounds of muscle without the sides. You can't have the best of both worlds.
    yeah, they said SD was not toxic too when it came out... and now we know wayyyyy better. interesting the similarity to phera

  9. once again I did a small write up on this one too. supplementsciencenews.blogspot .com

  10. Quote Originally Posted by futrochem View Post
    once again I did a small write up on this one too. supplementsciencenews.blogspot .com
    Nice write been yrs since organic for me so hard to remember the tech stuff. I agree this will be interesting, esp with the low toxicity claims.

  11. im very intrested in this new anabolic
  12. Question 2-ene effect


    Quote Originally Posted by UnrealMachine View Post
    I noticed a similarity to Pheraplex



    Idk about their claims though... You can't say that it won't cause gyno in even the most senstive users, Havoc/Epi is supposed to cure gyno and still sometimes will cause it. You can't have a product that adds 15 pounds of muscle without the sides. You can't have the best of both worlds.
    So we could say that Phera = 2-ene-Protodrol

    Anyone knows what is the effect of adding a 2-ene to a compound?
    The 2-ene improve oral bioavailability, or rise the a:a ratio, or ... ??

  13. I haven't seen anything that specifically addresses the 2-ene... But according some of the research I have read, an oxygenated 3 position is necessary for androgenic activity (not sure about anabolic) and the androgenicity of steroids lacking the 3 or 17 position oxygenation is dependent upon oxygenation within the body. This interested me because if you can produce an anabolic androgenic steroid lacking the 3-keto, then maybe androstenone or androstadienone which are completely legal pheromones, could be used as PH's. Although all the research I have read leads me to believe it is inactive as an androgen.

  14. Quote Originally Posted by futrochem View Post
    I haven't seen anything that specifically addresses the 2-ene... But according some of the research I have read, an oxygenated 3 position is necessary for androgenic activity (not sure about anabolic) and the androgenicity of steroids lacking the 3 or 17 position oxygenation is dependent upon oxygenation within the body. This interested me because if you can produce an anabolic androgenic steroid lacking the 3-keto, then maybe androstenone or androstadienone which are completely legal pheromones, could be used as PH's. Although all the research I have read leads me to believe it is inactive as an androgen.
    Yes, i've read the same about 3 position: lacking the 3-keto rise the q ratio of a compound (the same thing happens when you add a 1-ene to a compound)


    Edit: I just found an interesting article by William Llewelyn about 2-ene:
    Androst-2-ene Compounds: Overlooked

    In many regards, Ayotte's public comments about DMT being ineffective underline just how little WADA knows about the drugs it's responsible for policing. Had Ayotte possessed a very thorough background in anabolic steroid chemistry, she would have been able to quickly identify the merit in one of these modifications in particular, the 2-ene products. The papers on these steroids are not all that difficult to find. For example, in 1964, a group of Czech researchers published experiments on a novel 2-ene derivative of testosterone, specifically ansrost-2-ene-17b-ol.[1] They reported that this steroid had a very protracted duration of activity and overall potency compared to its parent steroid. This new 2-ene produced a 50 percent stronger anabolic response than did regular testosterone, while at the same time possessed 55 percent less androgenic activity.

    Other researchers put the numbers at 160%/60%[2] and 150%/50%.[3] Later, in 1967, one of the same researchers helped publish another paper attributing much of the increased activity and duration of effect of androst-2-ene to a marked resistance to metabolism.[4] The steroid is so potent because, among other things, it sticks around the body for a longer time than does regular testosterone. This modified 2-ene testosterone derivative was shaping up to be a very interesting steroid indeed, far from ineffective, as Ayotte suggested.

    In 1966, experiments were also published on a 17-alpha methylated derivative of androst- 2-ene.[5] They demonstrated even more striking properties inherent in this new orally active anabolic steroid. The methyl-androst-2-ene turned out to be 12 times more anabolic than methyltestosterone, the most common standard of comparison for c-17-alpha alkylated oral steroids at the time. Its androgenic component was less than double that of methyltestosterone, giving this new anabolic an extremely high anabolic to androgenic ratio (more than six to one). That is a tremendous difference, both in potency and overall androgenicity.

    To give you a little perspective, methandrostenolone (Dianabol), which is a popular known derivative of methyltestosterone, only tests out to be twice as anabolic as methyltestosterone. Oxandrolone (Anavar), one of the most potent commercial steroids known (on paper), comes in about three to six times more potent than methyltestosterone. When you go down the list, you quickly realize that methyl-androst-2-ene-17b-ol (on paper) is significantly more potent milligram for milligram than any commercially available prescription anabolic steroid. Had Ayotte missed the studies on androst-2-ene compounds completely?
    http://www.musculardevelopment.com/c.../view/146/116/


    And Phera/DMT a:a ratio is 6.5, but protodrol a:a ratio is 1.8 so, in paper, wouldn't be phera safer than protodrol (at least in terms of androgenic sides)?

    Anyway, all we know that the "a:a ratio" cannot mean anything in the real world, so we must wait for the first logs of protodrol to say how effective/safe it is.

  15. Agreed. It does look nice on paper, but the real world results end up being the lens we view a PH by. That said, we'll all want to guinea pig it as soon as it's out, lol.

  16. Epithio (Havoc or Epistane) > 2a,3a-epithio-17a-methyl-5a-androstan-17b-ol
    Furazabol > 17a-methyl-5-alpha-androsta-2,3-furazan,17b-ol
    winstrol > 17a-methyl-5alpha- androstano [3,2-c]pyrazol-17b-ol
    Protodrol > 17a-methyl-5a-androst-17b-ol


    Definitely a hormone best suited for cutting it seems.

  17. Quote Originally Posted by UnrealMachine View Post
    I noticed a similarity to Pheraplex



    Idk about their claims though... You can't say that it won't cause gyno in even the most senstive users, Havoc/Epi is supposed to cure gyno and still sometimes will cause it. You can't have a product that adds 15 pounds of muscle without the sides. You can't have the best of both worlds.
    It has to be taken with a grain of salt. As PA has stated, it is highly unlikely but it could happen. Also, we can't say that it is impossible to be without sides from this product, but only from what we've seen in the past it is unlikely that it will be side free. But, for the typical individual, it could be, this is what PA was referring to.

    Superdrol was said to be side free, or low sides bu from the research that I did, I was always skeptical of it. This has me intrigued though. I haven't had an interest in really digging in and pulling info on a chemical such as this in 2 yrs.
    ---The internet is the father of the electronic lynch-mob---
  18. Question Protodrol sides Vs Phera (2-ene) sides


    Quote Originally Posted by hardknock View Post
    It has to be taken with a grain of salt. As PA has stated, it is highly unlikely but it could happen. Also, we can't say that it is impossible to be without sides from this product, but only from what we've seen in the past it is unlikely that it will be side free. But, for the typical individual, it could be, this is what PA was referring to.

    Superdrol was said to be side free, or low sides bu from the research that I did, I was always skeptical of it. This has me intrigued though. I haven't had an interest in really digging in and pulling info on a chemical such as this in 2 yrs.
    Do you think Protodrol could be safer than phera?

  19. Quote Originally Posted by JBerto View Post
    Do you think Protodrol could be safer than phera?
    Who knows at this point. Phera is the best of the "designers" by FAR that i've ever used without question. The anabolic effects are simply awesome. I never noted any significant side effects with it either. If this could top phera, then i'd be impressed...

    Evolutionary Muse - Inspire to Evolve
    Legendary


  20. Quote Originally Posted by JBerto View Post
    Do you think Protodrol could be safer than phera?
    I can't say for sure...however, I ran phera and it was "good". I used to think it was perfect, but, when I think back, i really didn't gain very much from it in terms of strength on my big lifts. Oddly, my bench, bb curl, and hamstring curl went through the roof, plus military presses also. My squat/dead lift went up but I really do not think that 4 weeks is enough to get the best of the squat/dead lift routines.

    That's why i rather have something I can run for 8 weeks, at least, to really get the best of the heavy routines. Honestly, when I was running DTHC/Prime, my squat % went up MORE than when I ran phera 3 years ago. Even when I ran igf2/blueup/rpm/yellowgold/activate, my dead lift blew through the roof, most weight I ever lifted while deading (also, the % was more, so it wasn't just that I was stronger; however, that could have been do to better technique as well as my learning curve shortening.

    That being said, to answer the question, it's impossible to know for sure. i didn't have any side effects, not seriously, or long term issues with phera (we're talking original phera). No heart issues, or ventricle issues. I had several test ran after I came off of it at the 6 week mark. So, if this is "easier" on the body, then i can say that it's a definite winner. I'm just not to quick to dance with dht derivatives again.
    ---The internet is the father of the electronic lynch-mob---

  21. Is it me or does this look similar to the ONE? I thought the compound that PA was talking about was something totally different?
    ---The internet is the father of the electronic lynch-mob---

  22. NVM, I was looking at the wrong nomenclature. This is missing the ketone
    ---The internet is the father of the electronic lynch-mob---

  23. Quote Originally Posted by hardknock View Post
    Is it me or does this look similar to the ONE? I thought the compound that PA was talking about was something totally different?
    Hmmmmm bump!

  24. The 3 compounds are similar in structure:

    UnrealMachine has posted Protrodrol and Phera structures:



    And this is the structure of The ONE:




    And this are the nomenclatures:

    17a-methyl-5a-androst-17b-ol (Protodrol - q ratio: 1.8)

    17a-methyl-5a-androst-17b-ol-3-hydroxyimine (The ONE - q ratio: 2.7)

    17a-methyl-5a-androst-2-ene-17b-ol (Phera - q ratio: 6.5)


    Protodrol seems to be closer (in structure and q ratio) to The One than to Phera

  25. Thanks

    So how can Protofrol claim non-hepatotoxic profile!??!?!?

  26. Simple - Because they're not regulated. They, as well as most supplement companies can say whatever they want, knowing they will not have to prove anything. They go on theory as opposed to facts. You can be their guinea pig if you wish...
    Quote Originally Posted by Whacked View Post
    Thanks

    So how can Protofrol claim non-hepatotoxic profile!??!?!?

  27. Yeah, good call. No doubt. SAD

  28. Hey Guys,

    I posted this in the IForce section when it first came to light. I'm not claiming to be a chemist but after alot of research after I first bought IDS Bulk Tabs this is my conclusion. This is the same compound. It should be a precursor to Stanolone, read the Stanolone profile and all the claims that Bulk Tabs and Protodrol have are the same. Stanolone is said to be like dbol without unwanted water gains. Sorry pressed for time or I would write the whole Stanolone profile along with Bulk Tabs

  29. Quote Originally Posted by striketeam View Post
    Hey Guys,

    I posted this in the IForce section when it first came to light. I'm not claiming to be a chemist but after alot of research after I first bought IDS Bulk Tabs this is my conclusion. This is the same compound. It should be a precursor to Stanolone, read the Stanolone profile and all the claims that Bulk Tabs and Protodrol have are the same. Stanolone is said to be like dbol without unwanted water gains. Sorry pressed for time or I would write the whole Stanolone profile along with Bulk Tabs
    stanolone isnt that pretty much what was MMV2 by LG ??? if so i guess this is like another MMV2 ment as a cutting compound this protodrol doesnt seem very new or spectactular.

  30. Quote Originally Posted by striketeam View Post
    Hey Guys,

    I posted this in the IForce section when it first came to light. I'm not claiming to be a chemist but after alot of research after I first bought IDS Bulk Tabs this is my conclusion. This is the same compound. It should be a precursor to Stanolone, read the Stanolone profile and all the claims that Bulk Tabs and Protodrol have are the same. Stanolone is said to be like dbol without unwanted water gains. Sorry pressed for time or I would write the whole Stanolone profile along with Bulk Tabs
    Quote Originally Posted by Gym4Life View Post
    stanolone isnt that pretty much what was MMV2 by LG ??? if so i guess this is like another MMV2 ment as a cutting compound this protodrol doesnt seem very new or spectactular.
    Stanolone is DHT, and protodrol its not DHT.

    DHT (Stanolone) is 5a-androst-17b-ol-3-one
    Protodrol is: 17a-methyl-5a-androst-17b-ol

    There're 2 BIG differences: Protodrol is methylated and have not a 3-ketone.
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. i-Force Protodrol
    By chachi1984 in forum I-Force Nutrition
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-04-2010, 10:35 PM
  2. i force protodrol
    By suresha in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-11-2010, 09:41 PM
  3. i force protodrol
    By suresha in forum Supplements
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-10-2010, 07:09 PM
  4. i force protodrol?
    By suresha in forum Supplements
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-06-2010, 09:58 PM
  5. i force protodrol
    By Gym4Life in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-08-2009, 01:21 PM
Log in
Log in