EQ running time

  1. Question EQ running time


    What do most of you feel is the best timeline to run Eq 10wks 12, 14, etc.


  2. 12 weeks minimum IMO

  3. Is that because it is a slower acting aas?
    •   
       


  4. Quote Originally Posted by PitMann
    Is that because it is a slower acting aas?
    Yes, It's a very long ester ('slow acting'). It's along the same lines as a decanoate or undecanoate ester.

    FYI: EQ is Boldenolone Undecylenate (Undecylenate being the ester in question)

  5. So to yield the best results it's best ran around 16wks.......

  6. Quote Originally Posted by PitMann
    So to yield the best results it's best ran around 16wks.......
    Yes sir, 16 weeks would be a good go at it. As Matthew D said, you should go a minimum of 12 weeks on EQ.

  7. sorry to high jack your thread here but...which do you guys think is better EQ or DECA? I know its kind of like a personal preference but in my upcoming cycle im not sure which i want to run. Here is my dilema:

    1) both are long acting
    2) im going to be using letrozole for my upcoming cycle so the water retension wont be a problem for both
    3) one will give me a hunger increase, and the other will make me go limp...but im running test too
    4) i plan on running for about 16-20 weeks
    5) they are both along the same price

    So which one should i go with?

  8. If you're gonna go 16-20 weks then i'd go with EQ. Deca is great but i usually start getting deca dick around week 7-8 and going 16-20 weeks would make impotence a big problem post cycle. I also like EQ cuz I can stack it with fina.

  9. Quote Originally Posted by Blindfaith
    sorry to high jack your thread here but...which do you guys think is better EQ or DECA? I know its kind of like a personal preference but in my upcoming cycle im not sure which i want to run. Here is my dilema:

    1) both are long acting
    2) im going to be using letrozole for my upcoming cycle so the water retension wont be a problem for both
    3) one will give me a hunger increase, and the other will make me go limp...but im running test too
    4) i plan on running for about 16-20 weeks
    5) they are both along the same price

    So which one should i go with?
    Personally, I much rather prefer EQ. But, as you said both have their positives and negatives and really comes down to how you personally react to the stuff. I'd recommend EQ though over Nandrolone Decanoate.

  10. I think 10 weeks is sufficient. Longer would be fine but if you do not desire to have a 14 week cycle, 10 weeks will work.

  11. Quote Originally Posted by Blindfaith
    sorry to high jack your thread here but...which do you guys think is better EQ or DECA? I know its kind of like a personal preference but in my upcoming cycle im not sure which i want to run. Here is my dilema:

    1) both are long acting
    2) im going to be using letrozole for my upcoming cycle so the water retension wont be a problem for both
    3) one will give me a hunger increase, and the other will make me go limp...but im running test too
    4) i plan on running for about 16-20 weeks
    5) they are both along the same price

    So which one should i go with?
    well for me personally I always go with the eq. but another option you may have is to use both, which works suprisingly well. always run the eq higher than the deca, and yes you still have to use test.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Old Fugger gets Primal 550xd run... time to go to war...
    By DreamWeaver in forum Finaflex-Redefine Nutrition
    Replies: 248
    Last Post: 07-04-2012, 09:04 AM
  2. HCG max run time
    By the42nd in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-29-2005, 02:27 AM
  3. 3rd time on...Parabolin/EQ a good choice?
    By Pec in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-23-2004, 12:59 PM
  4. Time to Run T-1 final?
    By Forster in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-13-2003, 12:39 AM
Log in
Log in