+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 37

New Designer - Coming in March

  1.  02-08-2009  03:23 PM
    Registered User jasonschaffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    28
    Posts
    1,254
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    727

    New Designer - Coming in March


    Saw a preview for a new designer on another site. Its M1T with an added 5-6 double bond. Anybody have any ideas about this compound?
    Attached Images  



  2.  02-08-2009  03:39 PM
    Registered User stxnas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Stats
    5'8"  180 lbs.
    Location
    Florida
    Age
    32
    Posts
    9,970
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    745511

    Originally Posted by LakeMountD
    The name in Vida would be 17a-methyl-1,5-androstadiene-17b-ol-3-one. The reduced form of it is actually in Vida with a 3 hydroxy. Says it is 1.25 times more anabolic than methyl testosterone but does not give an androgenic value.
    Not sure how pertinent this is, but it's the only unbiased info that I've seen about it thus far. I have no idea what the differences would be with the C3 ketone vs the C3 OH.

    Sorry if I didn't help any
    On Indefinite Hiatus Until Further Notice
    I'll be around a little, but not sure how much.
    RcB

    •   


        
       

  3.  02-08-2009  03:50 PM
    Registered User jasonschaffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    28
    Posts
    1,254
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    727

    No, thats good. Where did you find that? I would have to assume the keto version would be more potent, but were probably looking at least 1.25x stronger then MethylTest...thats a start. Keep it coming guys.

  4.  02-08-2009  04:11 PM
    Banned crazyfool405's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Stats
    5'10"  198 lbs.
    Posts
    7,441
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    0

    Originally Posted by stxnas View Post
    Not sure how pertinent this is, but it's the only unbiased info that I've seen about it thus far. I have no idea what the differences would be with the C3 ketone vs the C3 OH.

    Sorry if I didn't help any

    the 3-ketone according to PA isnt needed to bind to the AR.

    thats all i know so far.

  5.  02-08-2009  06:04 PM
    Registered User jasonschaffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    28
    Posts
    1,254
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    727

    This has a 3-ketone though...

    I was thinking more along the lines of say 4-AD and Testosterone where 4-AD had anabolic activity on its own but not as powerful as testosterone. So if the 3-hydroxy version of this steroid has 1.25x the anabolic potency of MT then hopefully the 3-keto is more powerful

  6.  02-08-2009  06:42 PM
    Gate Keeper jminis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    MOD island
    Posts
    4,026
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    2173

    well not to burst any bubbles but speaking from experience what appears wonderful on paper doesn't always equate to the same in the real world. Time will tell I guess

  7.  02-08-2009  06:46 PM
    Registered User ibanezman08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Stats
    5'4"  181 lbs.
    Posts
    524
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    326

    anybody know what company is releasing it and what they're gonna call it?

  8.  02-08-2009  09:25 PM
    Registered User RUNNER 67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Stats
    5'11"  215 lbs.
    Location
    J-town
    Age
    46
    Posts
    172
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    628

    Originally Posted by ibanezman08 View Post
    anybody know what company is releasing it and what they're gonna call it?
    Z supps is releasing it and it is supposed to be called new Dominance. It was originally called M1,5ad. I have yried quite a few of his products and raws, and they were solid.

  9.  02-08-2009  09:31 PM
    Registered User b unit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Stats
    6'0"  242 lbs.
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,646
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1407

    Originally Posted by jminis View Post
    well not to burst any bubbles but speaking from experience what appears wonderful on paper doesn't always equate to the same in the real world. Time will tell I guess
    that was the case with Oxyguno if i'm not mistaken

    please correct me if i'm wrong

  10.  02-09-2009  05:07 AM
    Board Supporter xtraflossy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    on your screen
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,930
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1799

    ...ahh,.. like Oscar nominations; ...the buildup,.. the potential, the speculation...
    Doesn't it make science fun!!??

  11.  02-09-2009  12:04 PM
    Registered User chess315's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Stats
    6'0"  233 lbs.
    Posts
    218
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    178

    sound intresting

  12.  02-09-2009  12:32 PM
    Registered User stxnas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Stats
    5'8"  180 lbs.
    Location
    Florida
    Age
    32
    Posts
    9,970
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    745511

    Does anybody have any thoughts of the double bond of Dbol being moved from the C4 position to the C5 postion? I know this is being compared to M1T, but it is also looks VERY similar to Dbol.

    In fact, if you move the double in reverse of what I described above, I believe you would be looking at Dbol (not that that necessarily means anything since structure dictates function).
    On Indefinite Hiatus Until Further Notice
    I'll be around a little, but not sure how much.
    RcB

  13.  02-09-2009  12:58 PM
    Registered User dezzy84's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Stats
    5'5"  160 lbs.
    Posts
    96
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    111

    Arrow


    Interesting

  14.  02-09-2009  01:05 PM
    Registered User jasonschaffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    28
    Posts
    1,254
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    727

    Originally Posted by stxnas View Post
    Does anybody have any thoughts of the double bond of Dbol being moved from the C4 position to the C5 postion? I know this is being compared to M1T, but it is also looks VERY similar to Dbol.

    In fact, if you move the double in reverse of what I described above, I believe you would be looking at Dbol (not that that necessarily means anything since structure dictates function).
    Yes, you could also look at it as modified d-bol. May actually be more similar to D-bol since its not 5a reduced it can probably aromitize.

    And if our body can turn DHEA into Test, then it should convert this to d-bol via the same enzyme.

  15.  02-09-2009  02:04 PM
    Registered User isoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    366
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    250

    From limited testing and feedback on this, have heard it feels like 1-test with some bloat, still very new, should be available fairly soon, it is cool that it is a completely new compound, and from a very good, although, small company.

  16.  02-09-2009  02:11 PM
    Sponsor rms80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Stats
    6'2"  215 lbs.
    Location
    Charlotte
    Posts
    4,215
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    199536

    Originally Posted by jasonschaffin View Post
    Saw a preview for a new designer on another site. Its M1T with an added 5-6 double bond. Anybody have any ideas about this compound?
    looks a lot like methandienone (dianabol)- you would just have to change the double bond at 5 to 4- if it was me, I would have added a hydroxyl @ carbon 11 in b position- it will keep it from aromatizing- this stuff will aromatize fairly easily with that structure.....
    Dirk Tanis, BA, MSci
    Chief Operating Officer, Applied Nutriceuticals

  17.  02-09-2009  02:20 PM
    Sponsor rms80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Stats
    6'2"  215 lbs.
    Location
    Charlotte
    Posts
    4,215
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    199536

    Originally Posted by stxnas View Post
    Not sure how pertinent this is, but it's the only unbiased info that I've seen about it thus far. I have no idea what the differences would be with the C3 ketone vs the C3 OH.

    Sorry if I didn't help any
    3-keto (3-one) will give it a better fit to the AR than the 3-ol (3-hydroxyl)- but skeletal muscle contains a good amt. of 3a-HSD, which can convert 3-one to 3-ol....but this is irreversible, unfortunately, and the 3-ol would be much weaker than the 3-one

    it would be really hard to metabolize this down to 3-ol from 3-one b/c of the 4ene- 4-ene has to be reduced before the 3-one can be made into 3-ol
    Dirk Tanis, BA, MSci
    Chief Operating Officer, Applied Nutriceuticals

  18.  02-09-2009  02:33 PM
    Sponsor rms80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Stats
    6'2"  215 lbs.
    Location
    Charlotte
    Posts
    4,215
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    199536

    Originally Posted by stxnas View Post
    Does anybody have any thoughts of the double bond of Dbol being moved from the C4 position to the C5 postion? I know this is being compared to M1T, but it is also looks VERY similar to Dbol.

    In fact, if you move the double in reverse of what I described above, I believe you would be looking at Dbol (not that that necessarily means anything since structure dictates function).
    won't do much, if anything, to alter potency- I have only seen a couple of AAS that have a double bond at 5- methadriol is one I can think of off the top of my head, and it is weak as fuk (it is a 3,17 diol) and aromatizes fairly easily

    i think this would make it much more similar to dbol than M1T- the C5 alterations that I have seen DO aromatize to estrogen, and so do the C4's. A 1,4 diene like Dbol aromatizes, but a 1-ene like M1T does not (at least in large amounts, since it is similar to DHT) However, M1T does have progestational activity

    both are going to be a decent fit to the AR, both will probably act on the CNS some, and on glycogen retention- should allow for some good gains- but probably some water retention as well
    Dirk Tanis, BA, MSci
    Chief Operating Officer, Applied Nutriceuticals

  19.  02-09-2009  02:42 PM
    Registered User stxnas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Stats
    5'8"  180 lbs.
    Location
    Florida
    Age
    32
    Posts
    9,970
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    745511

    Reps for answering all of the questions of an armchair chemist...okay, I'm not even that
    Thanks Rms80!
    On Indefinite Hiatus Until Further Notice
    I'll be around a little, but not sure how much.
    RcB

  20.  02-09-2009  02:43 PM
    Sponsor rms80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Stats
    6'2"  215 lbs.
    Location
    Charlotte
    Posts
    4,215
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    199536

    Originally Posted by stxnas View Post
    Reps for answering all of the questions of an armchair chemist...okay, I'm not even that
    Thanks Rms80!
    no worries- they were good questions
    Dirk Tanis, BA, MSci
    Chief Operating Officer, Applied Nutriceuticals

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Any March Sales Coming Soon?
    By ViperKing666 in forum Nutraplanet
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 03-17-2011, 07:54 PM
  2. March of Dimes - March for Babies
    By David Dunn in forum General Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-30-2008, 09:09 AM
  3. March cycle...want to try different PH
    By altgilbersnic in forum Cycle Info
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-13-2008, 10:07 PM
  4. ADRENALEAN: Coming Soon From Designer Supplements
    By Big_Tom(tk) in forum Company Promotions
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 01-07-2008, 08:16 PM

Tags for this Thread