Congress Just Passed Tougher Steroid Legislation

  1. Senior Member
    holyintellect's Avatar
    Stats
    6'3"  295 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,224
    Rep Power
    696
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    56.21%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Congress Just Passed Tougher Steroid Legislation


    Maximum Steroid Trafficking Sentences to Double

    By Rick Collins, JD
    Collins, McDonald & Gann, P.C. - Dedication to excellence in the furtherance of justice.

    Congress has unanimously passed a bill (H.R. 6353, S. 980) to place strict controls on Internet pharmacies. Sponsored by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), the Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008 (accessible online at http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill...bill=h110-6353) is named for Ryan Haight, who died at 18 of a drug overdose in 2001 after he obtained Vicodin – not anabolic steroids – over the Internet. The bill was signed by President Bush on October 15, 2008, and became Public Law 110-425. Its most relevant amendments will take effect 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act (on or about April 13, 2009). The Act creates a new statute for offenses involving dispensing controlled substances by means of the Internet. The law attempts to clarify the laws regarding “rogue” online pharmacies and what constitutes a “valid prescription,” and also criminalizes certain advertising conduct in connection with such pharmacies. It also makes it easier for State Attorneys General to go after online pharmacies beyond their state borders.

    However, the Act has far broader implications for steroid trafficking cases in general. Let’s look at the most significant changes.

    Most importantly, the law increases the maximum sentence for selling anabolic steroids (and other schedule III drugs) from 5 years to 10 years (up to 15 years if use of the drug causes death or serious bodily injury), as follows:

    …in the case of any controlled substance in schedule III, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 10 years and if death or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 15 years, a fine not to exceed the greater of that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18, United States Code, or $500,000 if the defendant is an individual or $2,500,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both.

    For those with a prior drug conviction, the maximum increases from 10 to 20 years (up to 30 years if use of the drug causes death or serious bodily injury), as follows:

    If any person commits such a violation after a prior conviction for a felony drug offense has become final, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years and if death or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 30 years, a fine not to exceed the greater of twice that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18, United States Code, or $1,000,000 if the defendant is an individual or $5,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both.

    The increases also apply to steroid importation and exportation crimes, and to the new Internet crimes. The law also increases penalties for crimes involving Schedule IV and V drugs.

    The Act suggests that the new maximum penalties themselves should not be the “sole reason” for the United States Sentencing Commission to enhance the federal sentencing guidelines, as follows:

    SENTENCING GUIDELINES- The United States Sentencing Commission, in determining whether to amend, or establish new, guidelines or policy statements, to conform the Federal sentencing guidelines and policy statements to this Act and the amendments made by this Act, should not construe any change in the maximum penalty for a violation involving a controlled substance in a particular schedule as being the sole reason to amend, or establish a new, guideline or policy statement.

    That being said, it seems very likely that the Commission will conduct a fact-finding process to determine what if any amendments to the guidelines are called for based on the new law. The War on Steroid Trafficking is poised to launch into a higher gear next year.

    © Rick Collins, 2008. All rights reserved.

  2. New Member
    Prometherion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    219
    Rep Power
    193
    Level
    12
    Lv. Percent
    80.2%

    Yeah, I just saw this. Love how the gov has time for this with all the other stuff going on.
  3. Elite Member
    nosnmiveins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Age
    27
    Posts
    6,833
    Rep Power
    3523
    Level
    54
    Lv. Percent
    21.29%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    i read this elsewhere. but isnt it basically looking for distributors/sellers?
    •   
       

  4. Professional Member
    RoadBlocK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,212
    Rep Power
    96471
    Level
    42
    Lv. Percent
    8.95%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by nosnmiveins View Post
    i read this elsewhere. but isnt it basically looking for distributors/sellers?

    Most likely you are correct, but in order to target them, whose to say they wont start targeting buyers to build the cases?
    PHF Anabolic Trinity Epistane, Trenavar, and Mentabolan - Available Now!!
    Celtic Labs-Trestobol, HaloMass, Celitren, Ostabal and more Available Now!!
    PHF Rep/Celtic labs

  5. Senior Member
    holyintellect's Avatar
    Stats
    6'3"  295 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,224
    Rep Power
    696
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    56.21%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by nosnmiveins View Post
    i read this elsewhere. but isnt it basically looking for distributors/sellers?
    Changing the federal sentencing guidelines has absolutely nothing to do with who is targeted, the buyer or seller....Where your sentence winds up is based on how many units you are charged with, it has nothing to do with whether you were buying or selling.

    As of today, a unit is equal to 1/2 cc or 1 tablet....it makes not distinction for differences in mgs, etc....

    holy
  6. Elite Member
    suncloud's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  201 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Age
    37
    Posts
    6,352
    Rep Power
    3262
    Level
    52
    Lv. Percent
    30.96%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    damn. i wish we'd adopt the canadian version, where its illegal to distribute, but not illegal to possess. thats their stance with marijuana at least.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. NFL vs NRL what's tougher?
    By BoyFromAus in forum General Chat
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-25-2009, 03:27 PM
  2. Congress to Hold Hearings on Steroid Use
    By Jim Mills in forum Sports Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-28-2007, 09:42 AM
  3. Congress suggests steroid bloodtests
    By yeahright in forum News and Articles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-11-2006, 12:49 PM
  4. Bioterrorism Legislation and Protein
    By MadChild in forum Weight Loss
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-15-2003, 04:37 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-23-2003, 01:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in